All Cities - Top 100 - Average Appearance: 9.6 Performance: 9.7
Boston - Top 100 - Average Appearance: 8.1 Performance: 8.3 So either the grading scale is different in Boston... or the Boston providers are somewhat less attractive and/or less capable... or both. My 2 cents: The majority of "All City" cities are sun-belt or NYC and my guess is that Providers there are younger, tanner, fitter and more yuppy/urbanite. My further thinking is based on the visual stimulation of male arousal, which would suggest a correlation between appearance and performance, so more attractive leads to better performance (perception) and therefore the higher averages in both. The absence of even a small handful of Boston ladies is a bit mysterious, but a regionalized, cultural grading scale may account for a blue-blooded "glass ceiling"
is there a reason Boston isnt represented in the TER top 100 providers? we MUST have a few candidates here in the beantown area that should be up there....
like tinsle town and sylacone valley the sunshine state. the big apple, Vegas and dc less boob jobs lipo and botox here we are all natural. We are the more conservative n/east coast and I think the reviews reflect that as well somewhat.
here its just us hometown hearty northern Maine lovin baseball hockey watchin pats fan local beachcombin chicks. we are down to earth. we also because its a college town have a flux of fresh meat college students in the game while in school and they graduate and move on. A lot of p/timers
hey what do i know...just my take on it. I could bbe wrong
I think the other way to evaluate may be to see what reviewiers in those towns write about compared to Boston reviewers. I find it interesting, as I look into new gals to see, to not only read their reviews but to read other reviews done by their reviewers- and to see the kind of chicks they tend to see- all those trends have an impact on what and how they review I think.
I've browsed through the pictures & reviews of top-100ers and, tell you what, I agree with the conservative notion. There are some real gems here in Boston, I take the 100-list with a grain of salt, simply because of personal preferences. I also look at value. Several top-100 are pornstars with $1,000-$4,000/hour and the studios are in the sunshine "states". Just my two cents.
Love Boston and met so many wonderful ladies here, you gals ROCK!
All Cities - Top 100 - Average Appearance: 9.6 Performance: 9.7
Boston - Top 100 - Average Appearance: 8.1 Performance: 8.3
So either the grading scale is different in Boston... or the Boston providers are somewhat less attractive and/or less capable... or both.
My 2 cents: The majority of "All City" cities are sun-belt or NYC and my guess is that Providers there are younger, tanner, fitter and more yuppy/urbanite. My further thinking is based on the visual stimulation of male arousal, which would suggest a correlation between appearance and performance, so more attractive leads to better performance (perception) and therefore the higher averages in both.
The absence of even a small handful of Boston ladies is a bit mysterious, but a regionalized, cultural grading scale may account for a blue-blooded "glass ceiling"
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
