Hello everyone.  I am new to TER.  Clients interested in an extremely busty companion, feel free to visit me at my website, along with a few of my friends.  There should be something for everyone.

-- Modified on 2/16/2004 4:07:54 PM

In order for a provider to post her schedule/ad on TER regional discussion boards, you must first submit your website for inclusion in TER's Site Review Section. It's free. Here's the direct link.

http://theeroticreview.com/site_listing/index.asp

Click on the Site Listing Tools link on this page if you get stuck.

When you submit your website to TER's Site Review section, TER sends you a confirmation email which contains a line of code which you must add to your website. This code adds a small button to your website which creates a reciprocal link back to TER. The process usually only takes a few days.

You should also read TER's Provider Posting Guidelines. Here is the link to the guidelines.

http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=1184&boardID=30&page=1

If you have any questions, let me know. Good luck.

thirsty

-- Modified on 2/16/2004 4:16:52 PM

Come on, does this gfconnection group think we are really this stupid?

Three brand new glorious TER "reviews", all posted on the same day, all three submitted by posters with zero previous reviews:

2/16/2004  Summer, reviewed by tommartin (no other reviews)
2/16/2004  Leloni, reviewed by dcromwell (no other reviews)
2/16/2004  Raven,  reviewed by dgayle (no other reveiws)

Plus this:
2/4/2004  Shakara, reviewed by rondavis (only two reviews)
January?  Summer,  reviewed by rondavis (only two reviews)

ALL four providers from the same gfconnection web site.  All five reviews written with a very similar writing style.  Yes, I believe that some very strange happenings can actually be coincidental, but I just now took a look out my window and saw absolutely no pigs flying.  Doesn't mean they can't, but...

...draw your own conclusions.

atl_mgr

You can fool some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but you can't put one past this guy...

Nothing like a little research to shed a new light on things.

I hadn't posted a response, but I wuz thinking the exact same thing.

Lions 1, Christians ZERO

Old age, experience and cunning will overcome youthful inexperience and enthusiasm in most any situation.

Damn, this cat can sniff out a rat 3 miles down the road.... You're the Clark Howard of this hobby! We need to pay your ass for all the money you save us....

staff was notified yesterday morning.

Good work! I sent the info to Staff.

Just one point...

In this case, there is other evidence. For instance the similar writing style is very obvious. I just hope that people don't question every orphan review that they see. Everybody has to start with their first review. People sometimes get carried away when writing their first review. I don't think that the fact that somebody has only written one review is necessarily enough evidence to question its validity.

thirsty

I would hope the user login process and review submitting process is recording the IP address of the user in the database record.  If so, it wouldn't be hard to spot shenanigans by multiple, close together, user logins and review submissions from the same IP address.  Even given the very high rate of NAT usage these days, it would be a HUGE coincidence for two different user names to submit reviews close together from the same IP address.

I'm not sure what additional information Staff sees. As a board moderator, I see the same review info that you do.

thirsty

Staff has delisted and banned the agency.

thirsty

Multiple 1st time reviewers submitting 1st reviews of girls from the same agency. Granted, Leloni has gotten legitimate reviews under a different profile, so that alone is certainly not condemning.

These reviews submitted one right after the other read like they were written by the same person.

These reviews just happen to coincide with a post by the agency and new Eros ads.

Sure we guys do a lot of thinking with the little head, but that doesn't mean we NEVER use the big one.  I'm certain that staff can look up the IP addresses of the submitters, and I'd wager they're identical.  Good catch atl_mgr.

p.s.  You especially well-endowed gentlemen can vice versa that big head/little head thing.

-- Modified on 2/17/2004 3:47:10 PM

I agree...there was other evidence here. As you pointed out, there were a number of single reviews written for one agency's girls.

My point was that I've seen reviews questioned because they are orphan reviews. You need more evidence as was the case here.

thirsty

rondavis is a regular client of mine, and he told me that he would write a review, since I didn't have any at the time, and I just got a new web site.  He has seen other girls on this site, who have reviews, and I believe he has either posted reviews under different names or he didn't post any at all.  He in turn said that I could also post a message for clients who maybe interested in scheduling an appointment, or he could post it for me.  I chose to post one on the message boards.

I myself have notified the girls that rondavis posted a review for me and have asked the girls to ask clients to post a review if they felt comfortable with doing so.  Like many other clients who have good working relationships with providers, we try to have the same with our clients.  And there are thousands of clients who have been to TER, seen a provider on this site, and never posted a review.  There are clients who have never heard of TER (I know because I had a client who was interested in seeing a caucasian model who was super busty without implants, and I told him to check TER.  He had no clue what I was talking about.)  I am not ashamed to say, yes...I ask clients to post a review if they can...if they don't feel like it or just simply don't want to, then that's fine by me, and I have asked alot of clients over the past month to post a review if they can.  And I also have clients who would have posted reviews for me and some of the girls, in the past, but, we didn't have a website that we were associated with.  Alot of us that are on the site have been around a minimum of 3 years, and are just surfacing to alot of you guys.  I'm sure there are other clients on TER who have used our services, but didn't post a review because we didn't have a site.

Two other models have at least 2 previous reviews on this website sometime in 2002/2003,  from where they worked with an agency, under a similar or different name.  And Monica who is on the same site has had reviews in the past, but the agency she used to work for did bait and switch, and would send her on calls using some other provider's or stock models picture, because she had no pictures and I remember a client indicating that in her profile.

Bottom line is, everyone can think what they want to think, and I also have no control over how someone feels.  I didn't think asking a couple of clients to visit TER and post a review was gonna cause such an uproar.  I am going to stand my ground on this issue, as I know I have not done anything dishonest or deceitful.  If you are so concerned about what's really going on on TER maybe you should visit the sexwork website. (Just add dot-com) Some of you know about it, some of you don't.  Let me know if you're going to take this site at face value or not or if it will influence your decision to continue using TER.  I thought it was interesting seeing how people react to different situations concerning this site.  

For potential clients/hobbyist who are unwaivered by this whole thing we would love to have you as a client.  For those who want to make a big to-do about the whole thing, we would love to have you as a client as well, then that way you can post whatever you deem necessary as long as it's the truth.

Dang...sometimes Joc sounds half Vulcan.

And a very good point, indeed (we need a thumbs-up icon in here!).

I totally agree, orphan reviews should not be immediately discounted just because the poster has only one review.  Nearly every legitimate poster on this board was once in the same boat, and I'm glad nobody took me to task for posting my first review.  Actually, 3 out of my first 5 reviews remain unapproved by the TER 'gods' - reasons being "provider delisted" (Cameille), "review too old" (Kirsten Taylor), and "bad website" (Bailey of IN).  I almost gave it up as too damn difficult to get 'published'.

But only having posted a single review does (right or wrong) raise suspicion, and typically generates further investigation than would a review by a multiple-poster.  That extra scrutiny can't be all wrong.

And when that investigation turns up review inconsistencies, a provider with ALL single-poster reviews, similar writing styles with other single-poster reviews, etc., then it's time to go public in the best interest of the hobby.

atl_mgr

and if being half-Vulcan would get me a shot at that Vulcan sub-commander, T'Pol, on Enterprise, then I'd doubly take the honor.  Man, is she ever hot!

WoW!!! what else can I say????

say...."Beem her to my house, please joc-spock"