This report probably won't be very popular with the local Latina-loving crowd, but this situation needs to be pointed out for those folks who don't like to be deceived.

Several ads on Eros for Latina providers use fake stock photos, sometimes even recognizable porn stars:

Alicia - http://eros-atlanta.com/ads/at-sarah52-alicia1.htm
Ashley - http://eros-atlanta.com/ads/at-sarah52-ashley1.htm
Elaine - http://eros-atlanta.com/ads/at-sarah52-elaine1.htm
Morgan - http://eros-atlanta.com/ads/at-sarah52-morgan1.htm
Star   - http://eros-atlanta.com/ads/at-sarah52-star1.htm

All five of these 'providers' are also listed on the Latina Treasures web site, along with twelve others:
http://www.latinatreasures.net/gallery.html

Here's the complete line-up: Elaine/Lolita, Alicia, Ashley, Star, Morgan, Angel/Jennifer, Barbara, Jenny/Jessica, Daniela/Daniella, Nia, Sonya, Andrea/Melissa, Lisa, Nora, Giselle, Tricia, and Teresa.
Nearly all the pics are fakes. Several have other ads on Eros not listed above.

A related site, www.babiesfromipanema.com, now redirects to a secured Plesk login screen at https://eagle.speedfactory.net:8443

There are at least four telephone numbers used:  678-232-3006 (Richard), 770-673-0719 (Chuck), 770-673-0722, and 770-673-0726.

These telephone numbers turn up TER reviews for Barbara, Brenda, Daniela, Elaine/Lolita, Gloria, Giselle, Jenny, Jessica, Lisa, and Tricia.  Jennifer also has TER reviews, listed with the now-defunct babiesfromipanema.com web site.

You might get good service through these places, but you probably won't get the provider pictured in the ads.

Whatever happened to truth in advertising? Buyer beware.

-- Modified on 5/13/2004 1:26:05 AM

Thank you Inspector

I think I've seen other discussion about the pictures from LT not being real, but it's disappointing that Morgan's is one of them. They looked unprofessional enough to be real and I was saving up to see her... Your efforts to keep it real are greatly appreciated, Inspector. And FYI - I saw Mellissa, vsiting from www.miaminights.net the other day; also not the girl in the picture. Definitely not a 95 lb. spinner. Very unenthusiastic performance. Review forthcoming.

In most of these have; "let us say too musch of marketing twist to it" which makes one suspicious to begin with.

As usual, Mr. Inspector your effort is greatly appreciated.

but there's something odd about it.  The "List My Reviews" list shows it as Approved, but it does not show up in any search. [Just noticed that if you click on "see joc13's reviews" it DOES show up that way.]

While there, I had a chance to meet some of the other girls.  Below is what I had put in the review regarding them and the pictures on Eros.  If the pictures of Elaine on Eros are not her - they are very close.

From the review:
Took another quick shower, and while getting dressed, I asked her if there were other girls working there with her. She said there were 7 girls total, and that she would introduce me to the ones who were there. I met Morgan, Alicia, and Star. Turns out there was a Star afterall. I didn't ask, but my guess is that she didn't get to the location by the appt time, so they sent in Elaine, or perhaps Elaine also had an appt for the same time (appeared to be a 2BR apt), and the appts got mixed up. Anyway - now I have a good excuse to go back. All 4 of the girls have ads on Eros. Based on what I saw, the pictures of Alicia are probably not her (her hair was much lighter in person and she looked younger), the pictures of Morgan *might* be her, the pictures of Star *might* be her (if not, they're closer to the Star I met than the Morgan pictures are to the Morgan I met; the backgrounds still look more like model/photo shoot backgrounds than provider picture backgrounds), and the pictures of Elaine *probably are* her (she was wearing a necklace very much like the one in the pictures).

[I just went and looked at the sarah52 ads on Eros, and the 4th girl I met might have been Ashley instead of Alicia, since the Ashley pictures look a lot like the girl I met.]

Based on meeting them in person, Alicia (or Ashley; will have to decide which way to go) would be next on my list to see, followed by Star (and next time, I'll be sure to speak up if the girl that comes in isn't the one I actually made the appt with).

-- Modified on 5/13/2004 5:56:32 AM

joc13,

You are correct - very weird how your Elaine review does not show up using any search criteria (I tried name, phone, and even city).  It does show up when searching by reviewer, however.

The Alicia that you met cannot possibly be the Alicia shown in the pictures.  The Eros and web site pics for Alicia and Danielle are all of porn star Adriana Sage:
http://www.pornstarsxtra.com/babes/adriana/

The pics currently on their web site indicating 'Angel' have also been used previously as 'Jennifer' and 'Jessica'.  Who knows who this person might actually be.

Thanks for the additional identification info.

atl_mgr

-- Modified on 5/13/2004 9:58:13 AM

I did not clearly hear the name of the 4th girl I met, other than hearing it started with an "A".  When I went back and looked at the pictures, the person I met matched up more with the "Ashley" pictures than with Alicia, but the Ashley pictures still look too much like professional model pics than provider pics (even provider pics done by professional photographers have a different "look" to them).

And, while the Star I met *could* be the girl in the Star pics, the Star pics would be considered "glamour" shots compared to what I saw in person.  Of course, I'm sure it's difficult to be glamorous when you're sitting around the incall location all day waiting for appts to show up.

I have three more reviews in the queue, so I hope the weirdness doesn't happen to all of them.

Hi joc13, the review shows up under Massage Parlor Girls, not escorts.  I'm not sure what you did but that's where it ended up showing up.

ROFL!  That will teach you to claim that you are "a massage and BJ kind of guy" !!

-- Modified on 5/13/2004 1:24:59 PM

I decided to take another shot at the "sarah52/Richard" girls, so I called and made an appt with Ashley.  The girl I saw was really hot - young, thin, firm body - but definitely not the girl in the pictures (breasts and nipples were completely different size and shape than in the pics).  She did a very good massage, but went C for the BJ (just like Elaine).  Based on my sample size of 2, I'm going to make the conclusion that CBJ is "house policy" and not go back unless information to the contrary surfaces about a specific girl there.

I got a really good look at Morgan on the way out, and she is definitely NOT the girl in the pictures.

I have been to Latina Treasures a couple of times (see my reviews of Giselle and Lolita).  It is true that the pics on the web site are not of the girls that work there.  However, I will say that the girls there are really young and hot and I had a nice time.  LT really ought to take REAL pics of the girls and just blur their faces because the girls are young and sexy enough to attract clients with REAL photos.