Can any of the agencies justify why some of them keep "unavailable" models on their website long after the provider has disappeared? Sometimes YEARS after the girl has long since left the business? I know they do it so it looks to new visitors as if they have more on the roster than they actually do, but to me it is rather disingenuous to the girls and the hobbyists when you see 16 girls on the website and 8 of them nobody's seen in 18 months.

If you have less then 4 ladies. Then it looks a little too thin.