I have been concerned about the review process for all of my reviews.
I am honest and post a review that is accurate. The problem I have is that the review gets posted and it contains "old" data. My personal review is accurate, however, such data as a description of the provider contains info that is a year or two old, and for some unknown reason, does not reflect the current status of the provider.For example, the provider may be 20lb heavier now. Her rate may have doubled in the past year or two. The services that she provides may have changed. Certainly she is older than when she was first reviewed. Maybe she shaves now.
and maybe she is now a brunette!
I raised this question several months ago, but never got a satisfactory answer.
I'm sure other reviewers as well as providers must have experienced this problem. How do you providers feel about this?
How about you, Mr Moderator?

I think I remembering someone saying you need to place a problem report along with your review.

It has more "wieght" if a gent who is reviewing the girl does it than if the girl herself tries to get it changed.

Hope this helps.

xoxo
B

-- Modified on 4/23/2007 6:56:36 PM

Thanks for explaining it far better than I did!! Maybe the template should be updated with each reviewer, and so noted.

I had suggested some time ago that we should all list the length of time and rate paid in the Juicy Details of the review.  The "Profile" data just doesn't get updated often enough based on the details submitted with each review.  Sounds like we should also remind ourselves to include updated details on appearance, BJ status, Kissing status, etc in the text Details.

I also find it very frustrating to see a lady's profile listed as BBBJ only to read the reviews and find out the first guy was the one and only guy she ever did a BBBJ with, and all other reviews list CBJ.

I guess what really gripes me about all the profile data is that it has to be filled in, from scratch, with each review, and then it seems like the details submitted are hardly ever used to update the visible profile.  There should at least be a "submit review for this provider" link somewhere that defaults the profile data from the current profile and then allows updates to be made.