What do you think of Providers using 10 year old pictures?  I guess if she's had some cosmetic surgery and they're a true representation it shouldn't matter... but, seriously when you see 10 year old body shots with current facial shots only, don't you think hmmmmmmmmm?

What I think is that pics in ads everywhere are touched and retouched (except maybe candids).  How many reviews do you see that say "she looked better than her pics," or whatnot?  

I dunno, my pics were always indicative of what you'd get but there's a lot of photoshopping going on today that wasn't happening nearly two decades ago I suppose.

If a lady chooses not to use her current pics, then I have to wonder what else is she being dishonest about (e.g. HIV status, health, working for Uncle Leo, etc.)

Never mind, I thought you were a hobbyist.   I did not realize you were a bitter provider from years past. I understand now

Because it's amusing. And I love to see the WK's get so twisted.

If a provider is using old pictures, she is setting herself up for failure.  There are all sorts of clients for all sorts of providers.  

I don't always try to amuse myself, but when I do I drink, never mind, I do normally try amuse myself

Pics that do not represent true appearance cause for disappointment 100% of the time.

Not bitter at all dude. Of course I understand why you perceive me that way....  It's all you got. You can't come into this forum as a woman, being painfully honest without being perceived bitter. I'm raw and unfiltered...not bitter at all...loved my hobby days but sure don't miss kissing ass, political correctness and the overall game you gotta play as a hooker here.  

Even when their true, real life appearance is BETTER than their pics?   That was a pretty blanket statement you made.  And, again, appearances, both in pics and in real life, don't always dictate the quality of the session.

That the market would correct that pretty quick?

If your pictures are from 10 years ago, I'm typing "NO" in response to the review question: "Are the photos real?!"

You are just here to start shit with providers that you never liked anyway, go ahead it's ok admit it..I won't judge you any worse than I already do.  

Oh, so NOW you think that honesty is a prerequisite to being a smartass on here. You really should stop digging now.

If you wanna be a white knight for the dried up cunt who wrecks balls, go ahead.. You see I've already judged you too.

So you're a self-admitted smartass who likes to tell others how to be a smartass on this site? Classic.

Oh get real man, you know what I am talking about. If you select someone excluding their appearance, congrats, you are the one man on the planet who is not driven by physical attraction.

I would never exclude the appearance, especially when selecting.  I don't think we're are in much disagreement here.  I just don't think appearances, neither in pics nor real life make up 100% of the quality of the experience.  I will give you that it is certainly a huge portion of it.  All us guys think with the same two heads, lol.  I've been known to get curious about, and actually select from pics that I didn't find particularly appealing, but knew she offered more than just looks or lack thereof.