Reference:  http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=236281

In her current BP ad, she is using pictures of a model named Dannie Riel.  Unless Sumi is an alias, those pics are fake.  Something also tells me that IF Dannie Riel were to provide, she wouldn't be on BP and she wouldn't be charging those rates.  Of course, that is my opinion, but it is based on knowledge of this fine hobby.  

I am not calling out the reviewer, per se.  However, I have seen a lot of reviews where the statement of real pics was made when they are most likely not...  This is just a nice PSA to let those who might be interested that the pics most likely will not match the product.

I will send him a "grand" via any method of his choosing.

I will bet the actual meeting took place.  However, I think a lot of hobbyists see what they want to see...  She may look close to the pics in person and that may be enough.

Also, I think some people are just not that observant.  It's not the first time this has happened here  

ither a self review or by a benefact

He's banging Dannie Riel if the pics look similar.. but how could anyone respect the validity of the review when the photos are indeed fake!

I agree there's no doubt he probably did bang some broad... lol it just wasn't the model in the photos.

And when you say some people are not that observant.. tell me about lol, I glance at a ad last night.. thinking to myself damn I like what I see. I send her a email this morning.. and she says am I sure that a read her ad.. and I'm thinking wtf is she trying to hint at here... After rereading the ad again any thoughts of seeing her were gone.