Hey guys
Do you guys every worry that for the guys who put up reviews that the government could look up our URL addresses and figure out our usernames and prosecute us.  In the reviews we tell them pretty much what happened and our donations, so I kinda wonder about that.  Anybody with some technical and legal chops may be better able to allay my fears.

Thanks

.....than chasing sexually starved middle aged bums like us. We have drug problems, gang problems, crime problems, we are almost bankrupt as a country with so much debt. The ass clowns that caused our current economic depression are still on the lam. So I would think we are probably way down the totem pole for prosecution.  

I have never given a dollar to a woman in exchange for sex.

and I thought that all of the reviews were based upon fantasy.

I am not an attorney nor do I pretend to be a legal expert, although I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express one time, but I can't imagine that my writing a review through an anonymous account, through the internet that other people have access to, would in any way stand as an admission of guilt.

Do you really believe 1/2 of the reviews that are written? If we were all as good as we think we are we wouldn't be paying for sex, we would be charging!

Sorry but some black ops mission to bust a bunch of middle aged guys trying to get their jollies is about the least of my worries in this hobby. I am far more worried about disease, pregnancy, a pissed off boyfriend who finds out his high school sweetheart has decided to establish her own retirement plan or a crazy agency owner who threatens to out people.

Just one man's opinion,

Willy

Could look up? What makes you think they haven't done so already and are just sitting on the information? The Feds sat on Elliot Spitzer's information for at least half a year before moving in.

The rules of evidence would preclude the use of reviews unless other factors were also present.  For example, flipped provider testifies that what you said is true and she validates your alias to your actual name.  Or, you admit it was factual in plea bargain of some kind.  Or, other records from agency or provider are admitted into evidence which validate what was written.  There have been cases involving felonies where ter info was used, but it's not generally going to happen.  More likely shill posts in conjunction with other factors are used to substantiate a "promoting" charge.  Way too many technical details would also have to be present in order to accurately debate this issue.  But if you're intrigued, maybe you could take this question to the legal board.  It's been vetted there many times in the past.  The mere presence of a review by itself isn't a problem.

... in having sex with a consenting adult and then when you're tired, paying her to leave.

the other 399 was tip!!

I wonder what his alia is?

You could write 500 hundred reviews, stories, commentary and it still does not prove you had sex for money.  Additionally, in most counties in the US, this is a misdemeanor and a very LOW class one.  Why oh why would any LE agency spend the kind of money to cyber sleuth such a thing that brings them NO feathers in the cap?  Seriously, it's not much different than someone posting on-line that they drove 120 miles an hour on a freeway - you won't get a ticket, they have to catch you.