I hobby for the simple fact that it is easier and a better way to allocate my time.  Atlanta has a bountiful supply of non working women to pick from, but then you have to meet in a bar, get them drunk, deal with the awkward next day and all that shit.  I hobby for the simple fact that when I am done I can go and meet my buddies for a beer and not have to explain why I just came on her face and am now leaving.  Do I love an occasional challenge, sure, who doesn't it... but I am all about a sure thing and I get to fuck, not make love.

Have a great weekend.

JKNE

and support your kids.

Judgment for the plaintiff! Now get out of my court!

I've noticed that the spineless alias (supposedly) providers that post here tend to pull the 'you're a loser that has to pay women' card when they don't like what a male poster has to say to them. Let's look at the 2 choices for the guys:

1. A guy pays a chick $200-$1000 or more for guaranteed sex. In most cases he's gonna get her on her best sexual behavior because she wants repeats, good word of mouth, and hopefully a good review. He or she leaves the session with no worry (in most cases) of personal life problems.

2. A guy pays $200-$1000 or more to invest time (who knows how much?) into a chick in the hopes but no guarantee that he's gonna have sex with her at some point. When and if he finally gets there, it may be good or bad but either way, he's obligated to her in some way whether emotional or other. He can be a douche and never call her again but that sets up more problem if she's a stalker type. In a one night stand scenario, the same problems can occur. All this is possible whether the guy is single or married.

So who's really lamer? That's for everyone else to decide. I can definitely tell you who's smarter...

And to the alias providers that so easily call us paying guys 'losers', how much of a loser are you gonna feel like when Mr Wonderful finds out you've fucked thousands of guys before he got to you?

Good luck with that,

Sir Cumalot

Haha - I kid.  Good post.  The pay card does seem to get busted out a good bit when convenient for a nice low easy jab.  As with anything in life there are those that can dish it but not take it.

yes--sounds like this particular provider has a strong case of the provider blues and a love/hate relationship with her double life

It flat out sucks. But it's from the heart, I assure you.

Sir C

Variety IS the spice of life. How many hollywood couples that are both 10's in the looks dept-- last? Answer = NONE
no matter how good looking your spouse/partner is --at some point -6 months, 1 year , 2 years 5 years or the old 7 yr itch---it is going to get too routine and boring

Face It- ED is bshi*t -  men dont need viagra and cialis and levitra - its just the same ol same ol thats got them on the physically unable to perform list
men just need some New-Young-Hot-Wet&Tight - then its easy to get hard and go all night with no pills just new delicious puss

It's times like this that I wished I knew your true identity.  I can't get up from my desk because my dick is so hard at the thought of you verbally bashing some loser guy that puts down a provider and then brags about drowning her in jizz.  I'd drop the cash, drop my pants, and drop my load.  I'd expect your help in the last two.

This sounds all too familiar
I think JugsJewD must be roomates with HonkinOnBoBo  HoeMaffiaT and Fromaprovidersview

Scumbag, maybe...but loser, never.

Sir Cumalot

In fact, I gave her what I thought was sound advice. Never said I didn't want to see her because of her thread or anything else of the sort.

I don't use the word 'hooker' and have no interest in skull fucking or grudge fucking a provider. There's others I can think of, but no ladies in this biz.

Sir C

Put me in the alias generally give better info than not.  But there are quite a few of you guys who are a bit mysgonistic with your language.  Agreed no reason to say things like skull fuck.  Both sides who use strong language tend to bring it on themselves.  That being said have we answered oaks question?

are legitimate opinions on this subject.

Your reasons for using an alias are you own (as well as the subjects O allude to in the original post). I'm not suggesting you shouldn't use an alias but why would you (at least in this post)?

I'm not seeing where anything you said could hurt your business. In fact, I would think it would weed out the idiots that you're calling out from wasting your time.

I'm not goading you, I'm honestly asking.

Sir Cumalot

10-4, Juggster.

Sir C

I've drowned them in jizz and then they've put me down in some cases (can't blame them there)! HA!

That said, I couldn't agree more about Ms JewD...she sounds hot and fun.

Sir Cumalot

A looser quite regularly, 60+ reviews of you loosing (maybe sloozing is better word) jiz over ladies, walls, lamps, even blowing out a window.

After you drop your roll and your wad and your hour, you lose her to the Internet void you found her in.

If it means you do not have to be part of the "Real Housewifes of Atlanta" scene or the "Real Ho Lives of Atlanta" do you care if you are a classified loser.  Heck I would take the honoric and make it part of the Sir Cum coat of arms.  Enlarged stag horn blowing jiz over loser fence on verdant green Franklin note.

My friend, blow off the insults with more speed than you propel your load.

I am not sure which is more lame.  There are guys compaining about what ladies charge, there are ladies complaining about guys and their attitudes.  Ladies may have to endure a client that when over, they should have been paid a great deal more for what they had to endure.  Clients may pay for time with a lady that is not as good as they could get for without a fee, but not having to pay the emotional cost of a relationship makes the fee seem like a bargain (your suggestion of knowing how the night ends makes it worthwhile).  I know there are quite a few agendas out there, I just don't have time to keep track of them all.

At times this board seems to be seeking peace in the middle east while all I am simply looking for a piece.