Am I the only one that is completely turned off by tattoos ? I understand it's their body and certainly they can do what they want to do with it, but if I see a lot of body ink....I move on.

I would certainly urge young providers to think twice before getting it done.

Now that being said, there are certainly a few providers that I could overlook it on. Khori  pops into my head....but for the most part, if it's more than just a small tattoo on butt, ankle or small of the back....I'm not interested.

I just don't see why ladies with such great bodies put ink all over it. I just really think it detracts from what is already beautiful.

Your last two postings have been to express your disdain for guys who write a review that differs from your view of the world, and to tell women how they should deal with their own bodies.  Sounds a lot like the rhetoric and narrow-mindedness that we just had to endure during the presidential election circus.  Maybe I, a life long yellow dog Democrat, am turning more libertarian in my older age, but it just seems to me that everyone should work a little harder on themselves rather than trying to direct the lives and affairs of others.  2ndBaseman may well be a wonderful fellow (or gal for all I know) but I don't need you to tell me how I can write my own reviews, and I don't think our beautiful women need your direction on how much or how little, and even where, they should tattoo their bodies.  If you don't like something, that's fine and we should all respect your opinions, but don't expect every other living soul to conduct their lives in your own image.  Live and let live, buddy.

-- Modified on 11/21/2012 6:39:34 AM

I'll be sure and pm my next message to you to make sure you approve before I post.

Sorry, I thought this was a DISCUSSION board and these are 2 topics I thought I'd bring up to disuss. I guess I'm mistaken, I thought this was the place to express opinions.

Here's an idea, if you don't like or approve....don't participate.

This IS a discussion board, and it IS a forum to express opinions.  I only wish you would keep to expressing an opinion.  If you prefer blue over green, that is your opinion.  If you prefer big busty women over smaller women, that is your opinion and you are free to so express it.  If you think a provider deserves a rating of 8 and not a 10, that is your opinion and this venue encourages you to express it.  If you don't like tattoos that is your opinion, and you are free to shout that to the world at the top of your lungs.  But you cross over the line of opinion when you question the veracity of a review based solely on your personal view of how the hobby world should be.  And you cross the line of opinion when you counsel women against having a tattoo, or on the size and location of a tattoo, based solely on your personal distaste of body art.  Sticking your nose in other people's business is not just an opinion; it's intrusive.

And if you do choose to message me in the future before you post, I will certainly give it all the consideration it deserves.

I'll weigh in with my opinion.

I prefer seeing providers who are under 30. That is my choice. I am realistic enough to acknowledge that many women in that age group have tattoos. I would rather spend an hour or so with a young woman who has tatoos then just bypass that age group. If things don't work out with any particular provider, it probably isn't because of her tattoos but because the chemistry just doesn't work out. But that would be exactly the same as if she had no tattoos at all.

I met one on monday with no tattoos,i was in shock and so happy and told her so,what a rare find...also she had no piercings and she had a trimmed(not bald) fun box....i told her i just hit the lottery this reminds me of 15 yrs ago..

I TOTALY Agree

So it's up to you to decide what is acceptable on a fuck board ? I get it, thanks.

If I keep one good looking young lady from getting a tattoo.....I feel good about it and so will she when she's about 40.

Ahhh, he shows his true colors!  Good luck to you, buddy.

You seem to have a lot of familiar questions and opinions to the legendary outfielder, including being willing to make an exception for Khori's tattoo's.

Each to their own!

There are good and bad tattoos so you can't make such a sweeping statement.   There's some really incredible work out there.  I'm not a fan of the boob tattoo or the hodgepodge of different tattoos.  But when there is real unity in the design and the art is well done, it can be a beautiful thing. But each to his own...

Some have whole body parts camouflaged with tattoos which I see as tasteless and unattractive. Suppose, it is either rebellion or seeking attention.

There are plenty of choices so, not a make a big deal!!!!

-- Modified on 11/22/2012 12:24:06 AM

we have girls with tatoos & i always try to advise them to stop getting them but hey it the thing to do for the young generation now to cover their body with tats

Oftentimes, I am reminded why men  HAVE TO PAY for the company of a woman. You a reminder of that.  I am sure that in the real world, you would not be a man most ( if any) of the women in this " lifestyle" would take a second glance at! Making demands of a woman's personal choice or how they maintain their appearance to serve YOUR needs are generally saved for ones wife/ life partner.  When the need to insult or offend the women who seek to only bring pleasure into your life, keep your opinions to yourself. It seems a simple concept but one some people are to stupid to understand.
I imagine a session with you would be like nails on a chalkboard.

I don't get it either. One nice little, well placed tattoo is fine but a whole "herd" of them is a major turn-off for me. Plus, in some cases I think the person getting tattoo'd doesn't think it through before having them done. A friend of mine has tatts on both her ankles and had a huge job interview that came up and asked me what I thought she should wear. She said she thought she should probably wear slacks so they didn't see the tattoos at which point I told her that she should have thought about that before she got em. Many younger people think that the "older" folks just need to accept them because "everybody has them," but it's the other way around. Until this younger generation "takes over" as primary business owners, the younger folks are the ones who have to adapt.
Also, what's gonna happen when someone like Lebron James or some other famous folks decide that getting them was a stupid thing to do and they start getting them lasered off? The freakin lines will be out the doors with people wanting them off. Some career advice for some of you young ladies out there: learn to do laser tattoo removal because it's gonna be huge business in the not so distant future and you'll make a fortune!

Just expressing an opinion, not trying to tell someone how to live!

On with the opinion.

Not surprised that the majority of posters seem to agree with the OP that less is more.

In my line of work I see a lot of backsides of younger women.  Won't reveal what my line of work is, but I think a few of you know (PT at least).  Any way, it is remarkable how rare it is to see a back/butt on a young woman without a tattoo.  Initially I expected to see a certain class of women who shunned tattoos.  But there isn't one.  They seem fairly evenly distributed across ethnic and financial strata.  In other words, the woman without a tat is rare indeed.  (Indians and women of the middle east tend not to have them, rare exceptions.)

In my opinion, seeing the unmarred skin of a tatless woman is sexy as all hell.  Very rarely I'll see one that I think is sexy.  Almost always they just seem base.  To me.  Just my opinion.  I'm sure there are others that like them.

A--later