Here's all it says. And the only reference to Bareback relates to BJs:
"In order to keep our overall performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she performs one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. For each of these services that are performed, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum. Remember, it’s your review; within these guidelines you still get to decide what her score should be. You do not have to give her the ‘extra point’."
that got full of themselves during the period that TER was dark in the US (April 2018 to December 2019) and now that TER is back, more customers are looking at reviews before booking, and they don't have any reviews, so they continue to try to discredit TER as a valuable resource for customers, . . . . . . . without success.
But, gotta love the packages she offers on her website. My interpretation:
Regular Rates: You (client) are a loser. You are not even worth having a conversation with but I will fuck you.
GFE: Still a loser unless you sign up for my Semi-Exclusive Package. But, I probably will talk to you.
Semi-Exclusive: Total sucker. Enter the Findom kingdom.
Her tweet says:
"TER is telling clients that unless a girl swaps fluids, unprotected services, anal, two guys, or is bi she cannot get a 10. And rate 7 max
See what happens when you let disgusting tricks run the industry 🤷🏽♀️
So pretty much if you ain’t doing anal or raw you will have low score."
Sounds like she would like X-out-of-Y scoring!
.
With X-out-of-Y scoring, you first determine the max score allowed, Y; usually 7, 8, 9, or 10.
Then you can rate the experience itself. I have had many FANTASTIC 7-out-of-7s that were GREAT! And a 7-out-of-7 is more enjoyable than a 7-out-of-10. A 6-out-of-7 (86%, high school B or B+) is still pretty good but a 6-out-of-10 (60%, high school D or D- and maybe a path to summer school) sounds pretty bad. Which "6" would you choose (or at least investigate further by reading reviews, visiting ads).
.
You can't search S&P, Newbie, and General for [x-out-of-y], so you have to "Search For [scoring] all of these words" and "Author [impposter]" Just some of the hits:
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/scoring-policies-and-rules-how-about-x-out-of-y-scoring-981010
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/x-out-of-y-scoring-benefits-everyone-986768
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/x-out-of-n-scoring-per-cent-scoring--1-0-1-scoring-fake-bi-one-in-a-lifetime-858221
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/x-out-of-y-is-a-10-out-of-10-suggestion-928187
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/i-have-several-10-out-of-10-suggestions-for-improving-reviews-16959
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-ter-scoring-x-out-of-y-16865
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/x-out-of-y-is-a-10-out-of-10-suggestion-15714
.
And many other posts from me and others.
.
"X-out-of-Y Scoring: A 10-out-of-10 Suggestion."
Posted By: fjchpr
Seriously, without bias or agenda, want to know your opinion about this Twit:
...on TER's ad boards a couple of years ago. She received very good reviews, except for the most recent one. That may have soured her on TER.
My opinion - it's not a good idea to link to negative tweets about TER. Next thing you know they'll be calling us "slobbyists" again.
She sounds extra mad at ter rules for reviews. She sounds like someone who cannot handle any criticisma that come with reviews.
If what she is say is true then it's not right to tell the "PROVIDERS" that they can not get a 10 point rating unless they do things that they are not comfortable doing.
What kind of clients was she meeting. Who was giving this woman their money for mediocre services.
of providers downgrading services (while increasing rates) and hiding the fact behind a no review policy.
With reviews, she would no longer be as competitive in the market, as guys would be able to assess value of services versus cost of services.
We need reviews; without reviews here on TER and other boards, the only thing we have to go on is provider-curated content - and that is hardly geared towards helping clients make the best value decisions.
That being said, I am not a fan of the current scoring system (X out of Y for me) or free VIP for reviews. Also, if we could just keep provider profiles up to date, there would be little need to have quite so much detail in the "Juicy details".
Don't hate the player.
Don't hate the game.
Just don't play.
If she doesn't like reviews she can go UTR or demand no reviews from her clients. Otherwise she can just deal with it like every other provider here.
Just another egotistical "I look pretty so give me tons of money" twitter-obsessed woman. Imagine spending all that time arguing like that on the internet, especially when you supposedly provide a pleasurable time for men as your profession. Social media gives all the wrong people a voice they don't deserve.
