Los Angeles

WTF
oceanpacific9 53 Reviews 866 reads
posted

I recently saw a great provider and I look at some new reviews, I am just dumb founded at some of these a-holes over and over again. It seems the girl did everything that this shit bag asked for and he gives her a crappy review, I wil not name names but man am I pissed about this F-bag, this chick is all good and satisfied his needs and he will repeat if he wants a young look, screw you dirt bag. This is the kind Shit that drives these fine ladies away, and the arrogance, Just fuming over this a-hole and wanted to vent.

Hyori394 reads

you don't owe this dirt bag any favors?  so why keep his ID hidden?  

seems weird you vent like this and then protect him...

It is not rocket science to figure out who it was and I sure as hell am not protecting him, Beemer is probably right.

Posted By: Hyori
you don't owe this dirt bag any favors?  so why keep his ID hidden?  

seems weird you vent like this and then protect him...

At first glance it seemed the person you refer to is someone who dosent give high scores , but after looking at the "whopping" other 3 reviews I question the motives.  A smarter person would've given alley a 7/c8 or 8/8.  Her photos look good, she sounds fun.

If I wete the ter police, i'd look into that guy.  Seems fishy.

the beauty of this hobby is we are not emotionally attached to the girls

if your concerned that she will be ruined by this and your next session with her will suffer, i would understand. short of this why does it bother you?

I'll out him.  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1238301

The reviewer has a total of 4 reviews. Gives this cute girl a 7/6 while giving a 10/9 as the first post to another girl (only post that girl has btw), and a 8/9 to a different girl.  Started reviewing March of this year.  judging by the content of his post I dont understand the huge difference between the scores.  Something seems off.

Ally K, if you visit Phx I'd be over to see you ASAP.

I don't see anything inherently wrong with XxxKoreaxxX's review. Maybe they didn't connect. It happens.

From the photos, I'd give her a 7/X score myself. A 7 to me is a decent score.

Did you read the 10/9 and the 8/9 post?  I'm not disputing the 7 on looks (except for the 10 he gave the other girl, that is an odd score considering the "history of both reviewer and girl).  Ithe big deal is the 6 for service.  He has a 5/6 for a girl he didnt like.  Does the 6 in performance for Alley k seem justified compared to a 6 for a "bad time" and "9's" for similarly qualified "good times".  From reading his review just based off the words, it looks like a 7/8 or 8/8.  Even for the looks, why not an 8? Did she not look as good as the photo, was the "junk in the trunk" flabby? (he said he liked it). Why 7 and not 8?  But more than that, with him getting the "royal treatment" what was lacking in perormance?  Its all there, he said he had a great time, what was lacking for it to be a 6?

The words for the 5/6 are spot on. The review makes sense.

edited: my bad I got the 10/9 and 8/9 reviews mixed up.  Still seems kinda fishy.

Posted By: UCLA2K4
I don't see anything inherently wrong with XxxKoreaxxX's review. Maybe they didn't connect. It happens.

From the photos, I'd give her a 7/X score myself. A 7 to me is a decent score.
-- Modified on 5/18/2012 11:17:34 AM

Posted By: Rodgerdaily
Did you read the 10/9 and the 8/9 post?  I'm not disputing the 7 on looks (except for the 10 he gave the other girl, that is an odd score considering the "history of both reviewer and girl).  Ithe big deal is the 6 for service.  He has a 5/6 for a girl he didnt like.  Does the 6 in performance for Alley k seem justified compared to a 6 for a "bad time" and "9's" for similarly qualified "good times".  From reading his review just based off the words, it looks like a 7/8 or 8/8.  Even for the looks, why not an 8? Did she not look as good as the photo, was the "junk in the trunk" flabby? (he said he liked it). Why 7 and not 8?  But more than that, with him getting the "royal treatment" what was lacking in perormance?  Its all there, he said he had a great time, what was lacking for it to be a 6?

The words for the 5/6 are spot on. The review makes sense.

edited: my bad I got the 10/9 and 8/9 reviews mixed up.  Still seems kinda fishy.
Yes I did.  In the 7/6 review, he uses the word "nice" five times. Sounds like he had a nice time (6 on TER scale), not amazing. In contrast to the 10/9 and 8/9 where he could barely contain himself. Perhaps it's because he was more thrilled by their looks. Some people decouple Looks from Performance, some are influenced by both together to varying degrees.

As for why 7 and not 8? What's the difference between a 7.4 rounded down to 7, and a 7.5 rounded up to 8? We don't know what he's thinking.  Looks are up to the reviewer and don't need to be defended. 7 is attractive, 8 is really hot and what separates them is up to individual taste. Now if he gave a 5 in looks and everyone was giving 9-10, yeah I might be suspicious.

Ultimately, one or two average reviews won't hurt Ally. I just don't think the reviewer should be flogged for his opinion., even if I may not agree with it.

He gave a bad score of 5/6 for what reads as a bad time, but 7/6 for Ally for a good time.  Its the performance score that is in question.  I agree with you, hard to argue with a 7 on looks.

If he's legit, maybe the 6 on performance was a mistake.

Regardless, hopefully Ally has gotten enough looks from this thread to compensate for any negatives from that review.

Posted By: UCLA2K4
Posted By: Rodgerdaily
Did you read the 10/9 and the 8/9 post?  I'm not disputing the 7 on looks (except for the 10 he gave the other girl, that is an odd score considering the "history of both reviewer and girl).  Ithe big deal is the 6 for service.  He has a 5/6 for a girl he didnt like.  Does the 6 in performance for Alley k seem justified compared to a 6 for a "bad time" and "9's" for similarly qualified "good times".  From reading his review just based off the words, it looks like a 7/8 or 8/8.  Even for the looks, why not an 8? Did she not look as good as the photo, was the "junk in the trunk" flabby? (he said he liked it). Why 7 and not 8?  But more than that, with him getting the "royal treatment" what was lacking in perormance?  Its all there, he said he had a great time, what was lacking for it to be a 6?

The words for the 5/6 are spot on. The review makes sense.

edited: my bad I got the 10/9 and 8/9 reviews mixed up.  Still seems kinda fishy.
Yes I did.  In the 7/6 review, he uses the word "nice" five times. Sounds like he had a nice time (6 on TER scale), not amazing. In contrast to the 10/9 and 8/9 where he could barely contain himself. Perhaps it's because he was more thrilled by their looks. Some people decouple Looks from Performance, some are influenced by both together to varying degrees.

As for why 7 and not 8? What's the difference between a 7.4 rounded down to 7, and a 7.5 rounded up to 8? We don't know what he's thinking.  Looks are up to the reviewer and don't need to be defended. 7 is attractive, 8 is really hot and what separates them is up to individual taste. Now if he gave a 5 in looks and everyone was giving 9-10, yeah I might be suspicious.

Ultimately, one or two average reviews won't hurt Ally. I just don't think the reviewer should be flogged for his opinion., even if I may not agree with it.
-- Modified on 5/21/2012 10:15:11 AM

It wasnt so bad.
The performance number was absurdly low, but otherwise it didnt seem so outrageous to me at all.
It's just one person's opinion.
He explained the date and it clearly sounds like he got what he wanted, as you point out.
Anyone reading the review will know what you also learned.

I have come to suspect that more than we think, many 'reviewers' are either the provider or their booker/agent.  They trump up a few bad reviews for the competition, then give their own team a stellar review, then a few bad ones.  It's supposed to fool us since most of us are on to the fact that one isolated stellar review might be a fake.  I saw one provider who I am sure writes many of her own reviews, giving herself 8-10's.  Many of her reviews are probably real, and are very good, but her response to a low-rating is to come back with multiple fake reviews, all rating her extremely high.

Harpman60192 reads

and other insiders often intended to give a newbie K-doll a boost but in some cases to destroy the carreer of the competitions  new K-doll before it takes off.

Posted By: carreymore
I have come to suspect that more than we think, many 'reviewers' are either the provider or their booker/agent.  They trump up a few bad reviews for the competition, then give their own team a stellar review, then a few bad ones.  It's supposed to fool us since most of us are on to the fact that one isolated stellar review might be a fake.  I saw one provider who I am sure writes many of her own reviews, giving herself 8-10's.  Many of her reviews are probably real, and are very good, but her response to a low-rating is to come back with multiple fake reviews, all rating her extremely high.    

Register Now!