I'm used to a 'harder' crowd. And when I see an alias going after my dog, I gotta bite back.
Granted my boy posted under an alias himself, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out who he is.
My point is, Alexandra was wronged and my brother has a problem with that. And when he has a problem, I have a problem.
And this goes out to Fugly, too. I know your stance on how the ladies should be treated. You and I have went rounds about certain things. Are you going to deny the OP and let him get the shit kicked out of him? I'm here to stop that.
You can not let my post go up. But you can't stop me from PMing to whomever I want. Email or text for that matter either.
My boy and Alexandra were done dirty.
I'm surprised it came to this anyway.
What's going to happen, Fugly? At least give the OP and myself the benefit of the doubt so if he and I have to take on the whole board we have a fighting chance.
Does that sound fair? I'd hope so. 2 against 200 sounds fair to me...!
Desirable recently posted an Ad for Lindsey Li. However, it looks identical to Alexandra's "about me"... WORD for Word. It has fallen off to page 3 but here's the links.
Compare: http://www.alexandramin.com
Lindsey Li http://classic.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=211707&boardID=6&page=3
Additionally, Alexandra herself found it very odd as well ( see link below ) so the chances of being an honest mix-up is thrown out the window. ( Note that the "about me" is from her indy-website *NOT* while she was at Desirable, so they'd have to actually go to her website and copy paste it. )
http://classic.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=211952&boardID=6&page=3
Also, Lindsey is a korean, not a euro-asian. It's not an accurate description of Lindsey.
I read this note and I thought, "wow, has this reader never read information about agency girls?" Alexandra Min, who, by the way, I believe is one of the sexiest providers in this area, started with Desirable Companions. I don't know if she used that information while at DC but the language certainly is not protected or particular to only her. I have seen so many blurbs about providers that mimic other blurbs, normally with the same agency. In many cases it's just that the writer, not the provider, doesn't want to make up a lot of new stuff, so they use what they already have and add it to the new provider's pics.
I don't think that anyone will mix up these two ladies so what's the harm? Good luck to the new provider and best wishes to Alexandra Min, who I hope to enjoy soon.......
More important issues out there from my view.
Good day mate!
I'm used to a 'harder' crowd. And when I see an alias going after my dog, I gotta bite back.
Granted my boy posted under an alias himself, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out who he is.
My point is, Alexandra was wronged and my brother has a problem with that. And when he has a problem, I have a problem.
And this goes out to Fugly, too. I know your stance on how the ladies should be treated. You and I have went rounds about certain things. Are you going to deny the OP and let him get the shit kicked out of him? I'm here to stop that.
You can not let my post go up. But you can't stop me from PMing to whomever I want. Email or text for that matter either.
My boy and Alexandra were done dirty.
I'm surprised it came to this anyway.
What's going to happen, Fugly? At least give the OP and myself the benefit of the doubt so if he and I have to take on the whole board we have a fighting chance.
Does that sound fair? I'd hope so. 2 against 200 sounds fair to me...! ![]()
Don't stray my way or i'll hafta get Bo And Luke on ya'. They'll open up a can of whoop-ass on you.
Now that the Vegas board gets a little slow...
I think this would be a great board to "start some shit" on.
What you think Fug? LMAO
and didn't you guys get enough dogfighting when Michael Vick was here?
of themselves. So far they haven't needed help from me.
of their cage please give me some advance warning. I thought we were friends buddy. lol
they seem to have found a home there, I am sure Apollo would love to have the exclusive on Drunken Asian, MP67, OSP, Inicky et al. lmao
If it requires bribery, I am sure I can come up with a few bucks. lol
accolades for keeping the boards moving. You really have to take a side here.
NEW zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzMexico board
Reminds me of this song, for some reason.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He82NBjJqf8
While the practice of ripping off other provider's language may be common and rampon, it's still called 'plagiarism'.
Desirable should not have done this... especially to a girl who used to work with them. No matter how brief. Plain and simple. It's a part of courtesy to a colleague.
I know for a fact that Desirable never used that information when Alexandra was at Desirable. It was never their original.
Desirable STILL has her photos up even though Alexandra went independent as of December of 2010. She had Nothing to do with Desirable at that point, you following me Sparky?
Desirable then decides to plagiarize Alexandra's original work and use it on one of their new "K"-girls. This is not professional.
Sure, it might not be a big deal to most Johns who like to think with their dick, but it's still fucking very bad practice, plain and simple. I'm sure most providers would agree that they don't want their unique language stolen.
In fact, I HIGHLY doubt I will use the services of Desirable Companions from now on if they do not remedy this soon. I'm starting to lose respect for them very fast.
Someone is gonna win the Pulitzer Prize and the other party is gonna sue!
According to her review profile and from comparing the pics, Alexandra Min and Nikita are one and the same:
www.alexandramin.com
www.desirablecompanion.com/nikita.html
Hello, ![]()
Yes, you are right; Alexandra Min and Nikita Rae Carrera are one in the same body. However, although DS still has my profile on their website (not sure why), I am no longer affiliated with them. I have been independent since the beginning of December 2010. My two earliest reviews under my independent name on TER date to December 2010 and January 2011, respectively:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1051875
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1081959
I am completely independent now, and have been for some time. The information on DS's TER ad and profile on their website for Lindsey Li quote the exact same information written on the main page of my website.
I understand that this is somewhat of a "he said/she said" oredeal; my information has not been copyrighted, but in light of my work being copied I will have that changed. I have used the same text in many of my previous ads here on TER and on Cityvibe that predate DS's ad for Lindsey Li.
Just my two cents! ![]()
Cheers!
Alexandra Min
-- Modified on 7/21/2011 1:19:41 AM
Thanks for the insight, beautiful.
So maybe DC could explain why they're keeping providers on their site that no longer work for them? And maybe throw in an explanation on the copying of ads?
Anytime sweetie. ![]()
Alexandra
They've been pretty quiet so far. Maybe it's just an honest copy-pasting mistake or the mouse had a mind of its own. Who knows? lol
As for your info still being with them, maybe you could ask them directly to remove your info from their agency.
It would also be a good idea to contact TER and have them update your contact info in your profile.
I'm sure Desirable still gets calls from guys who read your TER Profile only to realize they just dialed Desirable's number instead of yours.