Washington DC

Yeah, the second day
Arovet 62 Reviews 557 reads
posted

when you posted you didn't know shit but you waded in anyway.

Oh and thanks for accusing me of siding with a stalker, typical ad hominem Tidwell attack. You really think that scores you points with the laydees, don't you? Get some help, you're a borderline sociopath.

For some of the dudes that review especially as it comes to looks offense is taking for highly critical guys....and offense for not giving out 9s or 10's.  And that could/does lead to guys not being seen by some women.  

I thought the game was to bust a nut with ease...and sometimes that includes seeing less than attractive women that you may not even really want to be associated with in real life. Cause Plain Jane's or less than your ideal bodytype can get attached, may want more, and do not want to be friends with benefits. And that's assuming Plain Jane's want to deal with ya on such sexual only terms.  

 

 

for ex. I think Melissa McCarthey from mike and molly is attractive face wise...but i'm really not into BBW so the max looks in my mind is 7 and her narrative could very well include explicit statements as stretch marks and Pillsbury dough girl stomach...but if she cool I'll see her a few times.  Now that means other BBW would not want to see a dude that made such a review because it wouldn't be a good match?!?!? How is a paying customer not a good match as long as the rules are obeyed and you don't saying anything offensive in person? why do some women need to feel attractive when the essence is i give you money...you give me pleasure; dudes ain't suppose to be tricking the girls since dudes are the ones paying, lol.

I think performance is quite important as actions are not subjective (though quality of actions is subjective) more than the description of looks for the ladies to measure themselves. This game is were objectification lives!

j-nova954 reads

If you can't string coherent sentences together please don't post!

Posted By: j-nova
If you can't string coherent sentences together please don't post!
 
if you can't get past a couple of typos....maybe you should log off.  

I'm not posting my thoughts in MS word, spell checking, fully re-reading, and then marking up the document before I decide to share my opinion on this board, lol. come on, man!!!!

Should meet for brunch tomorrow and leave us out of this babble.

j-nova765 reads

I don't care about typos, it's the rambling nature of your writing and lack of clarity that I was referring to.  You managed to say almost nothing but it took you 1,000 words to say it.

-- Modified on 3/7/2015 10:45:43 PM

I have had several providers tell me that they consider this as dating since they have a hard time finding a boyfriend who is faithful. A few of them told me that they should be paying me. One sent a text a few weeks ago calling me "the dude" the lol.

Posted By: DaveMogal
...A few of them told me that they should be paying me.
I bet they'd change their mind as soon as you took them up on that offer.  But its a nice illusion to offer.

....who doesn't find me hot as hell?! Sure I like making money and in this industry i'm a "seller" if you will but I know what it's like to be a consumer too. If i'm going to spend my hard-earned money I want to spend it on the best I can get. I'm not gonna waste my time or money settling for what I feel is just okay.

So....seeing someone you don't find ideally attractive is doing a disservice to yourself and the lady you're seeing. To an extent reviews are business and the lady is already getting the short end of the stick no pun intended because she's expected to make up for the lack of attraction you have for her. No one no matter how much money you wave at them wants to feel like "she'll do". And if you're not as attracted to her as you could be even if she's an amazing performer and does her best to please you there's a high chance any scores given won't be as good as they could've been which hurts her (even though yes we're supposed to pay attention to the content more than the scores yada yada yada). If you don't have a business or job where you're constantly critiqued/graded (ESPECIALLY on looks or where looks are at least half your grade so to speak) you might not ever quite get that. You'd be wasting your time (and the ladies' time) and money seeing someone you're not fully interested in. I could see another provider for pleasure too but I would not spend money on someone I thought was just "acceptable". I have a fully functioning brain....why would I do that to myself?  

We're people with feelings -n- shit, we're women and women especially p4p or not want to know and feel we're attractive (hot/sexy even) in front of the men/women we're spending time with. I not only physically but mentally prepare myself for every date. I want to feel and perform my best like a true professional should. I just can't do that if I already know ahead of time i'm not remotely the 'cup of tea' for the guy i'm about to see. I'd like to think I don't market to the "here just to bust a nut" type of guy who doesn't care much what he sticks himself into thank Flying Spaghetti Monster. I could ramble on but I think i'm good.

-- Modified on 3/7/2015 6:03:17 PM

I've said it once and I'll say it a million times if i have to.  Don't see women you aren't attracted to and expect her to make up the difference for your lack of enthusiasm. While it is my responsibility to make sure I provide the best possible experience I can, it is not my responsibility to make up for your lack of enthusiasm.  If you're not into it, I know it. And it makes it harder for me to do my job and do it well.  

Expecting me to make up for you not being into me or for your lack of enthusiasm sets me up for failure and sets you up for disappointment.  If you're hiring me, you should be in to what I have to offer.  If you're not, then move along and find someone else who you'll be far more satisfied with

....expecting a lady to making up for a guy's lack of attraction or rather lack of enthusiasm or something like that from.  But yeah +1 right back at ya!

Posted By: MissErinBlack
I've said it once and I'll say it a million times if i have to.  Don't see women you aren't attracted to and expect her to make up the difference for your lack of enthusiasm. While it is my responsibility to make sure I provide the best possible experience I can, it is not my responsibility to make up for your lack of enthusiasm.  If you're not into it, I know it. And it makes it harder for me to do my job and do it well.  
   
 Expecting me to make up for you not being into me or for your lack of enthusiasm sets me up for failure and sets you up for disappointment.  If you're hiring me, you should be in to what I have to offer.  If you're not, then move along and find someone else who you'll be far more satisfied with.    
   
 

Posted By: TrulyMsMocha
....who doesn't find me hot as hell?! Sure I like making money and in this industry i'm a "seller" if you will but I know what it's like to be a consumer too. If i'm going to spend my hard-earned money I want to spend it on the best I can get. I'm not gonna waste my time or money settling for what I feel is just okay.  
   
 So....seeing someone you don't find ideally attractive is doing a disservice to yourself and the lady you're seeing. To an extent reviews are business and the lady is already getting the short end of the stick no pun intended because she's expected to make up for the lack of attraction you have for her. No one no matter how much money you wave at them wants to feel like "she'll do". And if you're not as attracted to her as you could be even if she's an amazing performer and does her best to please you there's a high chance any scores given won't be as good as they could've been which hurts her (even though yes we're supposed to pay attention to the content more than the scores yada yada yada). If you don't have a business or job where you're constantly critiqued/graded (ESPECIALLY on looks or where looks are at least half your grade so to speak) you might not ever quite get that. You'd be wasting your time (and the ladies' time) and money seeing someone you're not fully interested in. I could see another provider for pleasure too but I would not spend money on someone I thought was just "acceptable". I have a fully functioning brain....why would I do that to myself?  
   
 We're people with feelings -n- shit, we're women and women especially p4p or not want to know and feel we're attractive (hot/sexy even) in front of the men/women we're spending time with. I not only physically but mentally prepare myself for every date. I want to feel and perform my best like a true professional should. I just can't do that if I already know ahead of time i'm not remotely the 'cup of tea' for the guy i'm about to see. I'd like to think I don't market to the "here just to bust a nut" type of guy who doesn't care much what he sticks himself into thank Flying Spaghetti Monster. I could ramble on but I think i'm good.

-- Modified on 3/7/2015 6:03:17 PM

 
I get it....but the end goals/results are the same. You want that full envelope at the end of the experience and he/she wants to have sexual contact/cum at the end.  

However, If a hobbyist is not interested in sexual contact & cuming there are other avenues for female friendship instead of the hobby . And if you have unreasonable expectations of clients it's a dating service instead of a hustle, which goes back to my thread below that the difference between the hobby and the civie world is that women in the hobby are accepting cash from dutdes for relatively on demand loving

Posted By: Life410
 
   
Posted By: TrulyMsMocha
....who doesn't find me hot as hell?! Sure I like making money and in this industry i'm a "seller" if you will but I know what it's like to be a consumer too. If i'm going to spend my hard-earned money I want to spend it on the best I can get. I'm not gonna waste my time or money settling for what I feel is just okay.  
     
  So....seeing someone you don't find ideally attractive is doing a disservice to yourself and the lady you're seeing. To an extent reviews are business and the lady is already getting the short end of the stick no pun intended because she's expected to make up for the lack of attraction you have for her. No one no matter how much money you wave at them wants to feel like "she'll do". And if you're not as attracted to her as you could be even if she's an amazing performer and does her best to please you there's a high chance any scores given won't be as good as they could've been which hurts her (even though yes we're supposed to pay attention to the content more than the scores yada yada yada). If you don't have a business or job where you're constantly critiqued/graded (ESPECIALLY on looks or where looks are at least half your grade so to speak) you might not ever quite get that. You'd be wasting your time (and the ladies' time) and money seeing someone you're not fully interested in. I could see another provider for pleasure too but I would not spend money on someone I thought was just "acceptable". I have a fully functioning brain....why would I do that to myself?    
     
  We're people with feelings -n- shit, we're women and women especially p4p or not want to know and feel we're attractive (hot/sexy even) in front of the men/women we're spending time with. I not only physically but mentally prepare myself for every date. I want to feel and perform my best like a true professional should. I just can't do that if I already know ahead of time i'm not remotely the 'cup of tea' for the guy i'm about to see. I'd like to think I don't market to the "here just to bust a nut" type of guy who doesn't care much what he sticks himself into thank Flying Spaghetti Monster. I could ramble on but I think i'm good.  
   
 -- Modified on 3/7/2015 6:03:17 PM
   
   
 I get it....but the end goals/results are the same. You want that full envelope at the end of the experience and he/she wants to have sexual contact/cum at the end.  
   
 However, If a hobbyist is not interested in sexual contact & cuming there are other avenues for female friendship instead of the hobby . And if you have unreasonable expectations of clients it's a dating service instead of a hustle, which goes back to my thread below that the difference between the hobby and the civie world is that women in the hobby are accepting cash from dutdes for relatively on demand loving.  
 

But this is clearly a very different type of business - a highly highly personal business, where ladies can refuse to see you for any reason they want.  And that's as it should be of course.  They are having sex with strangers, so how can we NOT respect their right to "just say no" for WHATEVER REASON they may not be comfortable with a potential client.  Just think about the alternative to this... what you'd be saying is that ladies should ALWAYS automatically agree to have sex with a guy assuming he meets some very basic minimal screening.  Sorry, but no lady should be made to feel she doesn't have control over herself in this most basic of ways, even if she has chosen to be in this profession.  This business is not the same thing AT ALL as other service businesses, where yes, you should provide service to all people who walk into your store or restaurant.  Rather than complain that this isn't like all other business, just be happy that there are so many lovely ladies who ARE up for the adventure of this clandestine little world.

Now tying this back to reviews, it does make this part of the hobby a delicate matter.  Leaving aside the obvious that guys shouldn't be dicks in their reviews and say gratuitously insulting things, there can often be a basic legitimate dilemma: do I be completely truthful, when doing so might come back to bite me in the ass?  While reviews help other guys, in certain cases, they may not be in the best interest of the individual reviewer. Your example fits this.  If you gave lady a low appearance score, it could very well impact another lady's decision to see you.  So it can make it difficult to be honest when honesty would mean giving a lower score than most other reviewers.  Even if a guy tries his best to navigate that zone of being both tactful and truthful at the same time, there will ALWAYS be the risk that a lady might not like what he wrote or the low scores that he gave to some others.

Bottom line - there is just a lot that we don't control.  Ladies are free to refuse anyone for any reaon.  But do your best to be a decent guy, leave honest but tactful reviews, then let the chips fall where they may.  And honestly, if you ARE a decent guy and are tactful, more times than not things are going to work out, so don't sweat the times that they don't.  Now if you come across as something OTHER than a decent guy, you will bear the consequences for that, and miss out on some fun times with some ladies.

OMG....these two paragraphs right here say it all.... thank you...someone with some sense:)  

Posted By: Jstgttnstrtd
But this is clearly a very different type of business - a highly highly personal business, where ladies can refuse to see you for any reason they want.  And that's as it should be of course.  They are having sex with strangers, so how can we NOT respect their right to "just say no" for WHATEVER REASON they may not be comfortable with a potential client.  Just think about the alternative to this... what you'd be saying is that ladies should ALWAYS automatically agree to have sex with a guy assuming he meets some very basic minimal screening.  Sorry, but no lady should be made to feel she doesn't have control over herself in this most basic of ways, even if she has chosen to be in this profession.  This business is not the same thing AT ALL as other service businesses, where yes, you should provide service to all people who walk into your store or restaurant.  Rather than complain that this isn't like all other business, just be happy that there are so many lovely ladies who ARE up for the adventure of this clandestine little world.  
   
   
 Bottom line - there is just a lot that we don't control.  Ladies are free to refuse anyone for any reaon.  But do your best to be a decent guy, leave honest but tactful reviews, then let the chips fall where they may.  And honestly, if you ARE a decent guy and are tactful, more times than not things are going to work out, so don't sweat the times that they don't.  Now if you come across as something OTHER than a decent guy, you will bear the consequences for that, and miss out on some fun times with some ladies.

Thank you!
 

Posted By: Jstgttnstrtd
But this is clearly a very different type of business - a highly highly personal business, where ladies can refuse to see you for any reason they want.  And that's as it should be of course.  They are having sex with strangers, so how can we NOT respect their right to "just say no" for WHATEVER REASON they may not be comfortable with a potential client.  Just think about the alternative to this... what you'd be saying is that ladies should ALWAYS automatically agree to have sex with a guy assuming he meets some very basic minimal screening.  Sorry, but no lady should be made to feel she doesn't have control over herself in this most basic of ways, even if she has chosen to be in this profession.  This business is not the same thing AT ALL as other service businesses, where yes, you should provide service to all people who walk into your store or restaurant.  Rather than complain that this isn't like all other business, just be happy that there are so many lovely ladies who ARE up for the adventure of this clandestine little world.  
   
 Now tying this back to reviews, it does make this part of the hobby a delicate matter.  Leaving aside the obvious that guys shouldn't be dicks in their reviews and say gratuitously insulting things, there can often be a basic legitimate dilemma: do I be completely truthful, when doing so might come back to bite me in the ass?  While reviews help other guys, in certain cases, they may not be in the best interest of the individual reviewer. Your example fits this.  If you gave lady a low appearance score, it could very well impact another lady's decision to see you.  So it can make it difficult to be honest when honesty would mean giving a lower score than most other reviewers.  Even if a guy tries his best to navigate that zone of being both tactful and truthful at the same time, there will ALWAYS be the risk that a lady might not like what he wrote or the low scores that he gave to some others.  
   
 Bottom line - there is just a lot that we don't control.  Ladies are free to refuse anyone for any reaon.  But do your best to be a decent guy, leave honest but tactful reviews, then let the chips fall where they may.  And honestly, if you ARE a decent guy and are tactful, more times than not things are going to work out, so don't sweat the times that they don't.  Now if you come across as something OTHER than a decent guy, you will bear the consequences for that, and miss out on some fun times with some ladies.

There are far too many of us out there for you to "settle" for what you feel like is only a "7" in your book. You absolutely have the right to not think all of us are 9's or 10's, but if you're going to spend the money, don't you want the most bang for your buck (no pun intended)?

Now, you must really want me to flip my lid on the "how is a paying customer not a good match" comment. I don't want to see every swinging dingaling with a fistful of cash. Yes, at the end of the day, I do this for monetary reasons, but I enjoy what I do because I'm very selective about who I spend my time with. If a "gentleman", and I use the term loosely for some, even one that can obey rules, as you say, just may simply not be a good match for me. Maybe it was something he said during reservation scheduling, not necessarily offensive, but enough to let you know, this is going to be a dreadful time. Why in the world would I want to spend even an hour miserable for money? I won't.

It's not simply you give me money, I give you pleasure as you stated. That is so transactional and mechanical. Those experiences are the worst and I really feel sorry for you if that's what it's been like for you. Don't you have more fun when your lady is having fun too?

I don't need your money to make me feel attractive, I know I am. I am a confident, strong woman, as are most of us. But I do want to enjoy my time. Big difference.

Posted By: Alexandra Kole
There are far too many of us out there for you to "settle" for what you feel like is only a "7" in your book. You absolutely have the right to not think all of us are 9's or 10's, but if you're going to spend the money, don't you want the most bang for your buck (no pun intended)?  
   
 Now, you must really want me to flip my lid on the "how is a paying customer not a good match" comment. I don't want to see every swinging dingaling with a fistful of cash. Yes, at the end of the day, I do this for monetary reasons, but I enjoy what I do because I'm very selective about who I spend my time with. If a "gentleman", and I use the term loosely for some, even one that can obey rules, as you say, just may simply not be a good match for me. Maybe it was something he said during reservation scheduling, not necessarily offensive, but enough to let you know, this is going to be a dreadful time. Why in the world would I want to spend even an hour miserable for money? I won't.  
   
 It's not simply you give me money, I give you pleasure as you stated. That is so transactional and mechanical. Those experiences are the worst and I really feel sorry for you if that's what it's been like for you. Don't you have more fun when your lady is having fun too?  
   
 I don't need your money to make me feel attractive, I know I am. I am a confident, strong woman, as are most of us. But I do want to enjoy my time. Big difference.
But you have room to experiment in this world with women of various looks. Maybe dudes want to try out their first black woman, their first middle eastern woman, or their first bbw to break away from their norm.  Then you realize you like the way bbw perform because of the bodytype...but are not your cup of eye candy.  

But I feel highly detailed/critical discriptions do serve a purpose as it inform guys of reality as opposed to air brushed photos. If a lady shows the imperfections you can go along with photo accurate. But if blemishes are not mentioned by guys you feel lied to when you see otherwise

Yes, you can experiment, but you make their reviews part of YOUR decision on who you see. I'm not a BBW, but it sounds like you aren't willing to give a BBW a 9 or 10 simply because she's a BBW, and that is wrong. Maybe she is a 9 or 10 amongst the BBW crowd. You're not supposed to be rating us compared to Victoria Secret models. If you were, none of us would fit your 9 or 10 mold and I'm goddamn HOT. I'm all for accurate ratings, but the more you speak, the more it sounds like you're hunting for a reason to NOT give a lady a 9 or 10. Example: Maybe you like 20-somes. So you'd give me a 5 (dare I say less) based on the fact that I'm 37. Is that fair to me? No, because I openly advertise my age and you would see it and choose to see me anyway because you wanted to try a MILF. And I have a face and body to rival most 20-somes. But it wouldn't be good enough for you, even though you knew it goung in...

Everyone's photos are not highly photoshopped. There have been times my photographer has had to use photoshop on my pictures if I had a bruise the day of the shoot, because I wouldn't normally have a bruise when I show up to see you. Is that being deceptive? No. But NONE of us are absolute perfection.

You're saying two different things. On one hand you say you choose to see BBW and then rate them bad because they aren't model hot, when you knew that going in, and then you're talking about photo-shopped photos and feeling lied to. Completely different subjects. I'm fairly certain there are NOT a band of BBW out there photoshopping themselves down to a size 2. They market their BBW, as they should.

Are you perfect? Do you look in the mirror and think it's a treat for us to be with you? It works both ways. No, you're not being paid, but I have as much choice in who I see as you do, and I don't want to see a 500 lb 80 year old either. Not for a million dollars.

Posted By: Alexandra Kole
Yes, you can experiment, but you make their reviews part of YOUR decision on who you see. I'm not a BBW, but it sounds like you aren't willing to give a BBW a 9 or 10 simply because she's a BBW, and that is wrong. Maybe she is a 9 or 10 amongst the BBW crowd. You're not supposed to be rating us compared to Victoria Secret models. If you were, none of us would fit your 9 or 10 mold and I'm goddamn HOT. I'm all for accurate ratings, but the more you speak, the more it sounds like you're hunting for a reason to NOT give a lady a 9 or 10. Example: Maybe you like 20-somes. So you'd give me a 5 (dare I say less) based on the fact that I'm 37. Is that fair to me? No, because I openly advertise my age and you would see it and choose to see me anyway because you wanted to try a MILF. And I have a face and body to rival most 20-somes. But it wouldn't be good enough for you, even though you knew it goung in...  
   
 Everyone's photos are not highly photoshopped. There have been times my photographer has had to use photoshop on my pictures if I had a bruise the day of the shoot, because I wouldn't normally have a bruise when I show up to see you. Is that being deceptive? No. But NONE of us are absolute perfection.  
   
 You're saying two different things. On one hand you say you choose to see BBW and then rate them bad because they aren't model hot, when you knew that going in, and then you're talking about photo-shopped photos and feeling lied to. Completely different subjects. I'm fairly certain there are NOT a band of BBW out there photoshopping themselves down to a size 2. They market their BBW, as they should.  
   
 Are you perfect? Do you look in the mirror and think it's a treat for us to be with you? It works both ways. No, you're not being paid, but I have as much choice in who I see as you do, and I don't want to see a 500 lb 80 year old either. Not for a million dollars.

Posted By: Alexandra Kole
Yes, you can experiment, but you make their reviews part of YOUR decision on who you see. I'm not a BBW, but it sounds like you aren't willing to give a BBW a 9 or 10 simply because she's a BBW, and that is wrong. Maybe she is a 9 or 10 amongst the BBW crowd. You're not supposed to be rating us compared to Victoria Secret models. If you were, none of us would fit your 9 or 10 mold and I'm goddamn HOT. I'm all for accurate ratings, but the more you speak, the more it sounds like you're hunting for a reason to NOT give a lady a 9 or 10. Example: Maybe you like 20-somes. So you'd give me a 5 (dare I say less) based on the fact that I'm 37. Is that fair to me? No, because I openly advertise my age and you would see it and choose to see me anyway because you wanted to try a MILF. And I have a face and body to rival most 20-somes. But it wouldn't be good enough for you, even though you knew it goung in...  
   
 Everyone's photos are not highly photoshopped. There have been times my photographer has had to use photoshop on my pictures if I had a bruise the day of the shoot, because I wouldn't normally have a bruise when I show up to see you. Is that being deceptive? No. But NONE of us are absolute perfection.  
   
 You're saying two different things. On one hand you say you choose to see BBW and then rate them bad because they aren't model hot, when you knew that going in, and then you're talking about photo-shopped photos and feeling lied to. Completely different subjects. I'm fairly certain there are NOT a band of BBW out there photoshopping themselves down to a size 2. They market their BBW, as they should.  
   
 Are you perfect? Do you look in the mirror and think it's a treat for us to be with you? It works both ways. No, you're not being paid, but I have as much choice in who I see as you do, and I don't want to see a 500 lb 80 year old either. Not for a million dollars.
You make valid points! But that's bubble/niche reviewing...what wrong comparing old/young, black/white, fit/skinny/thick/bbw to find best overall?  

Prime Halle Berry in the 90s is 10.  
J-LO in late 90s is 9 along with prime Kim K.  
Prime Beyoncé early late 90s-early 2000s is 8 along with prime Jessica Simpson & prime Britney spears.  

Most women are 5-7 including the hobby. I think 8,9,10 is rarefied air and a lot of dudes inflate scores based on my attraction standards. But it's whateva! I liked to be wowed at 8-10 like she should be on the cover of people magazine

Dude, you just made my point! You're saying we should be compared to celebrities. Sooooo not realistic. When Halle Berry & J-LO are selling their hoo-haa's, I'll side with you...

If you think celebrities photos (keep in mind you ONLY see them done up and ALWAYS photoshopped) really look the way they are shown in "movies" IN REAL LIFE then you were dropped on your head as an infant one too many times. How many of them have you met that would still rate so high on your scale?

I still stand fast to BBWs and old bags like myself should not be rated lower just for that when we openly advertise what we are and are still being selected to be seen, that's all. I am all for accurate reviews. But, I've met Mocha, for example, in person. She's not my bodybuild, but she is smoking hot. The fact that she's not a spinner type should not solely lead to a detriment in her appearance ratings. Because, most guys into a spinner WON'T see a BBW, and vice versa. No guy that likes huge tits is going to come see me. But that's why Baskin Robbins has so many flavors ; )

but the contradiction is a little confusing.

You say you want to date less than attractive to you, but then say those are the types that get attached?

Anyway.

I don't know who you've been seeing, but this isn't where I come to pick up men so the answer to that would be a resounding no.

And, I am autonomous and free to choose who I see. If I were to see your board posts I would definitely think that we wouldn't be a match. You could look at mine and say the same.

We all have free will here and that's a glorious thing, not something to be derided or insulted. If you didn't have a choice I'm sure your 'narrative' would sound much different.

Posted By: Nikki_Irish
but the contradiction is a little confusing.  
   
 You say you want to date less than attractive to you, but then say those are the types that get attached?  
   
 Anyway.  
   
 I don't know who you've been seeing, but this isn't where I come to pick up men so the answer to that would be a resounding no.  
   
 And, I am autonomous and free to choose who I see. If I were to see your board posts I would definitely think that we wouldn't be a match. You could look at mine and say the same.  
   
 We all have free will here and that's a glorious thing, not something to be derided or insulted. If you didn't have a choice I'm sure your 'narrative' would sound much different.
So ladies should be reviewed in a bubble? You need points of reference even known outliers to effectively make comparisons as that would be a better sample size.  

I'm just flushing out that seeing many women and ranking them causes problems. Ladies don't want men to be siskel and ebert with critical eyes to find the best provider(s) in their opinion.

it's that you can't string them together to make a coherent sentence.  

And, there are PLENTY of men who see women and rate them that aren't at my level (whatever level that may be) and for many reasons. Lack of funds, an unwillingness to go past a certain price point, etc. We don't need you to pretend like you're doing the world a favor by leveling the playing field.

The problem with your 'theory' is that subjectivity is at play. That's something that people take into consideration when meeting someone.  

I'm not sure why you're trying to control something that's out of your control because you're alienating women with your harsh critique and inability to make a point without being completely degrading about it.  

So, yeah, like Ms. Mocha said: JUST STOP

Something about how you're not into BBWs but you'd see Melissa McCarthy "if she cool?"

I just...I can't.

....my opinion. I was browsing the general board and re-did the thread,lol.  

The thing is....how can one give good reviews without comparison? Everything is relative imo. We have seen a guy with a lot of reviews that once posted here be4 the BP fiasco. At a certain point you become a critic of the hobby!  

It's like the ladies would hate if a dude saw them all and ranked them accordingly and critically...That's my point! It's okay for people to review and see there perfect lady...but to see as many as you can to be a trusted critic is frowned upon.  

 

Relax people....it's just a remix I did of a general boards post :-)

Do you need to see a BBW to know you're not attracted to them?

Do you have to see a girl with tiny tits to know you like big ones?

Do you have to have a girl roll her eyes in your face and tell you to hurry up because you've got 5 out of 15 minutes left to know you don't like that sort of thing?

Do you have to eat at Taco Bell to know that sushi is delicious? Or can you just eat it and figure it out?

And no, you don't eventually "become a critic". I know several men who have managed to do this for twenty years without thinking they have to be a jerk to have fun, and you certainly don't have to waste money on people you know you won't enjoy in order to understand that another girl does it for you.

Posted By: OhCharlie
Do you need to see a BBW to know you're not attracted to them?  
   
 Do you have to see a girl with tiny tits to know you like big ones?  
   
 Do you have to have a girl roll her eyes in your face and tell you to hurry up because you've got 5 out of 15 minutes left to know you don't like that sort of thing?  
   
 Do you have to eat at Taco Bell to know that sushi is delicious? Or can you just eat it and figure it out?  
   
 And no, you don't eventually "become a critic". I know several men who have managed to do this for twenty years without thinking they have to be a jerk to have fun, and you certainly don't have to waste money on people you know you won't enjoy in order to understand that another girl does it for you.
We live in the ESPN/twitter/Instagram/yelp aka yell your opinion era! People do things and have experiences just to talk about it, be it good or bad! I honestly read some dudes review on here because they are generally entertaining and I lmao.  

It's a new era compared to the vets in which you have spoken. In general this is the do it to post it on social media for reaction/go viral era! Consequently, this is the do it to review it on TER era imo. Some dudes talk about being great lovers and the girl cums a million times in their reviews, which is funny if they do it right....  and some guys write reviews in which you go "OMG I can't believe he was was so mean in description" and people end up laughing.  

Reviewers have an audience, arguably more now in days than ever.... and once someone complainins  about a review it ads to the interest/humor.  I'm Just giving my views on things taking place these days

"Reviewers have an audience, arguably more now in days than ever.... and once someone complainins  about a review it ads to the interest/humor.  I'm Just giving my views on things taking place these days."

I mean... Really. Come back from the twilight zone dude.

Register Now!