Last soapbox entry, because I doubt anyone’s reading this at this point. My point is I suspect that judgment is all about intentions and the road to hell isn’t paved with good intentions.
If a scientist rushes out a vaccine because people are dying and that vaccine ends up blinding people, he’s not in danger of hellfire. On the other hand, if a scientist rushes some dangerous drug to market without properly testing it because he can’t wait to make his millions, he might have some explaining to do.
If a rifleman snipes an enemy soldier from 100 yards on a battlefield or a rifleman snipes a civilian from 100 yards on the streets of Sarajevo or a rifleman snipes a civil rights leader from 100 yards on a hotel balcony, they’re all physically the same act. But only two of those snipes are demonstrably evil.
It’s not the “what” but the “why” that condemns. The road to hell is paved with bad intentions. These ladies aren’t here because they’re trying to “rend the moral fabric of society.” They’re here for various reasons. They like sex, they like making people feel good, they don’t mind listening, and on and on. And like other therapists, artisans, or entertainers, they don’t think it’s strange that they should be paid for their work.
And as far as rending society goes, there are a lot of guys out there with bad options or no options who would say they’re doing them some good. Like the unhappily married man whose only socially acceptable options are to suffer or to get a divorce. (That’s not me, so I’m not rationalizing.)
Passing judgment on a business based on pleasure is above my pay grade and beyond the Angry Prophet’s pay grade. As Courtney Ova said on another board on the same subject, if he’s genuinely trying to persuade somebody, he’s going about it the wrong way. So, his methods might betray his real intentions.
Sermon over. I’m done. Just wanted to get that out into the universe before I popped a vessel. I’m taking my soapbox home