Washington DC
I'm trying to see to what extent "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder".
My guess is that this girl is easily 9 or better to vast majority of guys (with hardly anyone thinking she's a mere 5 or 6), but that's just my opinion.
So, what's your appearance rating for this girl?
Not a shill post because she's not a provider as far as I know.
If she IS, I'd be booking an overnight with her... like, yesterday! 
My guess is that this girl is easily 9 or better to vast majority of guys (with hardly anyone thinking she's a mere 5 or 6), but that's just my opinion.
So, what's your appearance rating for this girl?
Not a shill post because she's not a provider as far as I know.
If she IS, I'd be booking an overnight with her... like, yesterday!
My guess is that this girl is easily 9 or better to vast majority of guys (with hardly anyone thinking she's a mere 5 or 6), but that's just my opinion.
So, what's your appearance rating for this girl?
Not a shill post because she's not a provider as far as I know.
If she IS, I'd be booking an overnight with her... like, yesterday!
don't get grumpy that it's turning out differently than you expected..... 
there are 9s i would call for an appointment and 9s that i would not. there are those pretty and nice to look at without wanting to touch versus those you just want to get next to ASAP.
How could any body live up to a fantasy of perfection...
Your Mom is pretty hot though,
Or are you afraid to let people know down deep inside you harbor that desire?
Seriously, the post had nothing to do with who you would fuck as much as who you thought was hot or not.
And you do know she is over 21 grandpa,
Hahaha, if not a child molester, a MILF molester maybe? 
for some reason it made me think of a little girl... under 18 who was trying on Mom's naughty nightwear. so it struck me as not that hot, a 7 tops, as i said.
quadseasonal posted a pic that looked much more mature sexually which i gave a 10.
i found it interesting that the pose could have such a large influence on how i would rate: a swing of 3.
hmmmm.... last i checked, i don't molest. if the person is in no condition to give informed consent (too dim, too young, or too drunk or otherwise intoxicated) it is a HUGE turn off and she gets cab fare home.
She doesn't look THAT young to me, most likely early 20s maybe.
Even if she's 18, I don't mind 18 year olds either... Not much younger than I am because I'm still in my early 20s (mentally) as far as I know. Physically, now that's a different story.
I too agree with the responder that I'm a bit surprised but seeing differences in opinion is precisely what I was looking for in this thread.
Can you post a photo of who YOU think is 9 or 10?
It has to be "non-provider" or the post won't stay up, and you can't post photos of my secret girlfriend, err, your wife.
As of today, 12 people scored her a 9 or above. Sounds like that is the "majority".
One said 8 but he couldn't see her face. Two said 7. Your response on the other hand, very questionable being biased to "prove your point". Seems like.
I don't disagree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder but ONLY within a certain range, (a 9 to me is a 10 to some, an 8 to a few.....
but still somewhere around a 9 to vast majority. Can't deviate much from there. )
As you can see from the survey, there ARE limits.
At a certain point, the difference in opinion is minimal. No 5 or 6 here. Now watch someone will say she is a 5 just to pull a claudius, lol
who can't take a friendly banter or debate. I do enjoy your statistical analysis and your posts are usually more intelligent than most people.
As a part theorist / part experimentalist, I like to run quasi-experiments. There are theories that make total mathematical sense... and then there's reality. Much of what I learned about science consists of trying to make sense out of discrepancies between what's observed versus the theoretical model.
The one alias experiment done earlier, showed that one alias is too easy to get 'outed'. (I'm sure many know who I am by now. LOL) In this debate, I think this little experiment proved that there are certainly set limits to this "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder" business. Now don't get me wrong though, I do in fact believe that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder to some extent ( I certainly don't think martha stewart is a 9)
As you know already, my stance is that the variance is much less than we think (assuming the same locale / era ). I think if we limit the audience to a certain age group, etc,... the variance might be even less.
if you start asking questions like that i'll have to charge you for answers!
size dress . A definitive ten on looks IMO.
There are discrepancies on her age and height on different sites .
I like the this one the best.
First Name: Catalina
Last Name: Otalvaro
Nationality: Colombia
Place of Birth: Cali, Valle del Cauca Colombia
Date of Birth: December 15, 1988
Eye Color: Blue
Hair Color: Brown
Height: 180cm - 5´11
Weight: 52 kg - 114 lbs
Measurements: 36D-24-36
Shoe Size: 9
Dress Size: 6
http://www.bellazon.org/catalina-otalvaro.html