Ok do not jump on me too much. I have seen several indus that have 9 ratings continually and rave reviews. BUT the majority I have visited are older than they state and than the pictures show. But still no one mentions this. Is there a stigma that if a hobbyist outs a well established indy that the hobbyist will get black listed? Just wondering. By the way the visits have been very good....but definitely Not actual representation of the age listed and photos shown. Thanks!

Everyone knows that more than likely when you knock on that door, the lady that answers it, will not look exactly like her photos. Now when she does it is truly a good day, you have to look at how many reviews she has, Years, and do the math, LOL.. Also most of the hobbyist chalk this up as part of the game as long as she doesn't say she looks like Janet Jackson and you show up and she looks like Freddie Jackson. Besides she can make up for the difference in other ways....

I Love All You Sexy Ladies, Please Don't Judge Me, I will Get 100 Years....

DaTrufe

A lot of the well reviewed girls don't look like the pictures but I think the scoring is relative. This topic has been discussed a lot on here but in my opinion hobbyists rate compared to other escorts.

"Model Material"? How many of these girls could actually be models but some if not most are attractive. There is pressure to not ruffle any feathers so most guys give similar scores to the previous ones for that girl. Also, if some of the average looking girls are getting 7's and 8's then to be fair most guys will give the decent looking ones 8-9s.

I didn't come up with the system I just play by it ha.

I've seen 7 ladies and each has looked very much like their photos - not a single dissappointment yet in the looks category.

Please tell us how great the other 4 were since the 3 you reviewed are 1) older while 2) and 3) hide their faces.

Real world 1-10
here 2-12
adjustment to get from here to real world: deduct 2 points off of looks rating.

END OF MESSAGE

Obviously I can only compare from what I could see in the photos, so in some cases this was bodies and just blurred faces.
I imagine if I continue in this hobby long that I'll have some of those moments of dissappointment upon walking in the door (heavier, much older, question if her at all, etc.).
I haven't had any of those moments yet - have never felt misled.
So yeah, if that is a common experience, then I guess I'm just lucky - but also thankful for reviews that helped me choose.
(or maybe you think I'm just blind?? - well, perhaps I am, but if so, then blissfully so and I'll gladly continue on as such!)

I guess I should also add that one lady I reviewed had a great rate and a nice body, but only a so so face in her photos.  Her face was still just so so in person, and I reviewed her overall looks accordingly.  But her photos were an accurate reflection of her current looks.  Since you seem so curious about my hobbying - Penny, Samia, and Nikki Nice are my non-reviewed girls.  Mostly just sheer laziness is why I haven't reviewed so far (though I really should put something up for Samia, because she was something else...)

Stating the obvious, you could avoid disappointment by just seeing younger providers. Lord knows there are plenty of high quality choices in the early to mid 20s. How young do you want them to be?

I guess my question would be: in what way would it benefit you personally to point out in a review that a woman is older than she says she is on her website? What would be the fallout for you, personally? How would it benefit the hobby community? What would be the consequences for her?

To out someone for anything, you have to have proof. You can't just go by what you guess, because that is just conjecture and purely subjective, right? If you had 10 guys in a room with the same woman and told them all to guess her age, you wouldn't get 10 identical answers. You might skew older -- women might appear older to you, just from your frame of reference. Some people look older than their age, because they smoke, for example. I happen to look younger than my age. People are usually surprised when I tell them my age.  So you'd have to see her driver's license to be sure. And I don't think that will happen. So why put yourself in that position? You wouldn't appear credible, either.

It would be one thing if someone flaked on you, didn't show, was less than enthusiastic, was not clean, etc., etc. Those might be something you might genuinely point out in a review, if you were so inclined to alert the community about a negative experience.

But if you weren't 100% positive about something that is opinion-related, that is really different. Someone being late is a hard fact. Someone appearing older than you expected is more of a guess.  And your "guess" is impacting her livelihood.  So, no, if I were a hobbyist I wouldn't go there.

If you saw someone who was rated a 9 repeatedly but she wasn't what you expected, you could always rate her less and then it seems like that would take care of the issue right there, without you jumping into the deep end of conjecture.  After all, a rating is just one man's opinion.

I don't know how clients get blacklisted or if there even is a blacklist but they get bad reps for being violent, stiffing, and ncns.  These occurrences are RARE. That's the only reasons why I have heard of anyone getting a bad rep, e.g. on date-check. I don't think you would get blacklisted for something you said in a review.  People say stuff in reviews, I think we all know that.  I think we all get that reviews are not gospel.  It could be that there is something I don't know about but I kind of doubt it. Providers might be less likely to see you but that is not the same thing as being blacklisted, is it?