http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1426757
He leaves the money on the table. She spends 15 minutes chatting on the phone. The guy is nice about it and goes to shower.She didn't have a condom ready so he goes out to buy a condom
but when he tried to get back in the room, he couldn't because she refused to let him back in! Some of the donation turns out to have slipped into his bag from the wind or something.
She still got $120 though, she could have just let him back in to get his stuff! He ended up sending her the remaining cash through a friend because she wouldn't let him back in....
He still gives her a 8 in looks and 7 for performance, BUT NO MENTION OF A SESSION TAKING PLACE. :S Sounds like she's too new, unprepared, and too much unnecessary drama!
-- Modified on 2/2/2014 6:57:48 PM
I mean really...did you have nothing better to do with your time than to try to stir up unnecessary drama?
A simple PM or email inquiring about the situation would've sufficed.....
Not hat it matters, but with a name like Sookie Lee I thought your profile would have said Asian not white.
Two things how does money blow off the dresser?
...and did you refuse to give the client his possessions back, unless he payed in full?
I don't have PM so if you don't want to answer publicly, I can't currently view PM
Should not bring anything to the Incall other than the gift and car keys. Cuz we might t run the risk of not seeing them again!
Also expecting a client to bring condoms?
Any provider who expects a client to bring their own condom must be a complete Newbie...
SOME OF US HAVE A SIGNIFICANT OTHER.
Just try explaining a presence of a condom in our pocket or car when get home.
HELLO???
I choose to avoid clueless providers... Better to wait till they get a hang of the business...
In the mean time, plenty of hookers exist who know how this works, can keep discretion, and most of all not confiscate our belongings while still keeping our money.
Two things how does money blow off the dresser?
...and did you refuse to give the client his possessions back, unless he payed in full?
I don't have PM so if you don't want to answer publicly, I can't currently view PMs
If you read his review correctly, the reviewer had his things returned to him and then he realized the money he was supposed to leave was still in his bag. So that tells me the he did not properly display the donation, thus causing the confusion...
Also expecting a client to bring condoms?
Any provider who expects a client to bring their own condom must be a complete Newbie...
SOME OF US HAVE A SIGNIFICANT OTHER.
Just try explaining a presence of a condom in our pocket or car when get home.
HELLO???
I choose to avoid clueless providers... Better to wait till they get a hang of the business...
In the mean time, plenty of hookers exist who know how this works, can keep discretion, and most of all not confiscate our belongings while still keeping our money.
Two things how does money blow off the dresser?
...and did you refuse to give the client his possessions back, unless he payed in full?
I don't have PM so if you don't want to answer publicly, I can't currently view PMs
To confiscate personal belongings. Sounds like something only a cheap street walker would do.
What kind of a hooker takes part of the donation, sends a client out to get condoms,. Yet when he returns she doesn't let him have his personal belongings back?
It isn't like he was being violent at her. What if he had his work ID, and other important stuff in the bag?
And try explaining a missing bag to the wife.
The guy was nice enough to give her the donation tevergreen though a session never took place. WTF?
Hookers gotta work for their money, not take advantage of manginas who are too soft and wimpy to stand up for themselves when a hooker is clearly bullying him into forking over the cash with out doing any work. I think that part of the problem are the manginas themselves, this is why some women treat guys like this like shit cuz they know they can get away with it.... I mean the mangina even paid her in full when he never even got a service. Lma
Maybe she felt like she was being shorted her money and asked him to leave...
Sounds like a total misunderstanding to me. I've meet the provider in question and she's a sweetheart. No need to start drama and assassinate her character...
What kind of a hooker takes part of the donation, sends a client out to get condoms,. Yet when he returns she doesn't let him have his personal belongings back?
It isn't like he was being violent at her. What if he had his work ID, and other important stuff in the bag?
And try explaining a missing bag to the wife.
The guy was nice enough to give her the donation tevergreen though a session never took place. WTF?
Hookers gotta work for their money, not take advantage of manginas who are too soft and wimpy to stand up for themselves when a hooker is clearly bullying him into forking over the cash with out doing any work. I think that part of the problem are the manginas themselves, this is why some women treat guys like this like shit cuz they know they can get away with it.... I mean the mangina even paid her in full when he never even got a service. Lmao
Is not acceptable in my book. Misunderstanding or not, she had no right to keep $120 and when no service was provided. She should have given back the money in full along with his bag and shit if she wasn't going to see him or let him back in.
Sounded like She was blabbing on the phone for 15 minutes too, so what the F*ck was he paying her for? Talking on the damn phone with her friend?
Are you really that dumb not to understand this?
But then again youre just another white knight. May likely even be the mangina himself?
Is that how things work now, manginas being a hooker's little b*tch even though she's scamming people. Who is bending over for who
Seems like someone needs to seriously get laid...
If she scammed the guy, why would he give her a 7 score? Obviously he got something from the date. Use your brain idiot.
You're the idiot here, read the review again. No condom. She kicked him out. Session didn't take place.
Or are you suggesting she offered him bare back full service?
After all she didn't even have a condom so if he really did get something out of it, she must have let him do her bare back.
Thanks it all makes sense now!
Not to gang up here and I realize shit happens, but taking a 15 minute phone conversation when someone is paying by the hour and then not having a condom ready on top of that sounds pretty unprofessional in my book. Would make me think twice about scheduling with her if she is so inconsiderate of other people's time.
For the 15 minutes of time got spent yanking on the phone with someone else
and this happened during a session with a client.
You didn't even have a condom ready.
You never provided any service other than yanking on the damn phone during a session.
So why the Fuck did you expect him to pay up?
Chatting on the phone, coming unprepared, and even taking someone's belongings??? And I don't care if you return them later or not. SMH there seems to be people who think as long as you return them it makes it ok. The part about not having condoms is probably not accurate. I think it's just an excuse she used to try to get the guy out of the room. My experience wasn't great either but nothing like that happened. Would I go back? No.
Like you.
I guess I don’t see your role in this 6 month old drama piece. You dredge up a review that is old history. Presumably it wasn’t your review—but we obviously don’t know. Then you decide you have the need to trash someone about events you weren’t at. Really have to wonder why. Other than you just enjoy being a jerk. An anonymous jerk at that. If you had a bad time with her, be man enough to write a review and tack your handle to it. Otherwise you come across as a jilted doubles partner or a loser who has nothing productive to do with their day other than read 6 month old reviews and take anonymous shots at people. Must be a great life.
And before you come back with the far too overused “white knight” comment, I don’t know the lady and will likely never meet her. I am also not commenting on her actions at all—just yours
When a provider is a NCNS most people agree that it is a good idea to let others know.
How's is this any different? You see a girl who is a red flag, we let each other know.
Or are you just too pussy whipped for Sookie
Heck maybe she's your own daughter lo
Speaking of red flags, you got a lot of pent-up aggression my friend
Yes, people want to know when something adverse has happened.
And as you yourself demonstrated, IT WAS WRITTEN UP IN A REVIEW, wasn't it?
Or are you?
So, what is your REAL reason for believing that out of all the SIX MONTH OLD reviews you have a god given duty to protect us from this vile scum of the earth provider? Why this one? Accidental? Doesn't seem so when you are SOOOOOO intent on making sure you defend yourself on what a number of folks seem to question. I'm sure you were just randomly pursuing old reviews and the evil of this one lit the righteousness of your paladin-like nature. You felt the wrath of god running through your veins, anointing YOU as the one to right this wrong! Anonymously, of course. All the weird zealots seem to like their anonymity.
Once your zeal mellows, go back and read what I actually said: I didn't support or condemn her actions. I only commented on YOUR actions, not hers. Nice attempt at tossing a red herring in there.
Then explain why the original review wasn't sufficient warning for anyone who reads it.
I didn't even know Sookie existed until maybe 3 weeks ago tops and that's how I got a whiff of her shocking 6 month old reviews. I've only read it recently so your senile judgement and baseless assumption that I'm bringing up old news would be entirely false.
Are you too old to realize that some reviews just may go unnoticed by most people unless it's brought to people's attention?
If your fading memory from dementia comes back to life, maybe you can remember that there's an invention called 'news paper'? When your Alzheimer attack subsides, recall that some news are worthy enough to make it to front page for a day or two. Who anointed me to walk the path of righteousness and bring this topic to everyone's attention? Well, I supposed it was all god's will that we the sheeps do the right thing. God made me do it.
When your Alzheimer attack subsides, recall that some news are worthy enough to make it to front page for a day or two.
And you equate a news story sticking around "a day or two" to dredging up a stale review that is six months old?
By the way, when you feel compelled to defend yourself and reply to this--as I am sure you will--that will be at lease ELEVEN posts you will have made on this topic.
Yep. Vendetta. Stalker. Angry ex. Thank you for confirming it. Explains the "need" for your alias and your unwillingness toadmit you are wrong. No, the jilted ex (you) can never admit they are wrong. Anyone who is considering seeing her can read the reviews for themselves. That's why they are there. No one needs you to hold their hand. Is there a word for a reverse-shill like you?
You the Knight in shining armor came to her rescue, condoning her actions and turning a blind eye simply cuz it happened six months ago.
It doesn't matter if a crime happened hundred years ago old man, the memories of justice system go pretty far back, I'm sure you know this you just don't have the balls to admit it. Don't call your self a man of you can't man up or understand that theres no time frame, statute of limitations for something like this.... Even though you try so hard to place one, nobody gives a damn about what you say. You fall to understand that a crime is a crime and some crimes need to be exposed.
So according to you, if your daughter was raped ten years ago she should just move on and not say or do anything about it? Your judgement and understanding of the situation clearly shows that you still have a lot of growing up to do despite your old age.
Did you realize you're going pretty far too defend this girl?
Yup shill. Worst white knight ever. Don't ignore facts just because your mind is full of fictio
Sure you wouldn't have replied. Yep. I believe that one.
You are an angry blowhard who likes to hear himself/herself rant.
Try actually reading what I have posted. I haven't said a single word defending her. I just pointed out that YOU are an irate, fixated stalker. And this recent post of yours--along with the one on the other thread--just show the world that you are still spiraling farther into the depths of your illness.
Rant away little boy/girl. Rant away. Can't wait to read delusion #12 from you. I know you'll post it, you can't help yourself.
You accuse me of bringing up a 6 months old review, when in fact there are no statute of limitations.
So old man, you still haven't answered my question. If your daughter was raped, are you gonna tell her to suck it up, call her a irate, fixated stalker if she has not sucked it up by the 6th month?
This thread was something I started. Of course I'll reply. You, on the other hand, decided to come along and make dumb comments that have nothing to do with the subject. Too old to remember what the topic was about huh? Get treatment for dimentia, maybe that'll help you old man 
Some day you are going to wake up and realize each post makes you sound more the vengeful stalker.
“Statute of limitations”??? Clearly your posts demonstrate there is no statute of limitations on your stupidity.
“Rape”???!!!??? You are not seriously equating the two things, are you? Next will you start saying that J-walkers and mass murderers should be treated equally? That is not only stupid, but degrading to any woman who has been sexually assaulted.
As to my posting on “Your” thread—tell me, what is the purpose of a board like this? Oh, that is right, it is to exchange ideas. If you wanted your own private soap box to exact your pound of flesh why don’t you start your separate blog and then you can keep off any posts that have the audacity to call out your stalker nature. And how can my posts possibly be off topic when they are about the stalker nature of the OP and OPer? It doesn’t get more on-topic than that.
But I do admit reading your posts is humorous in a morbid teen locker room sort of way. Please don’t stop (as if your compulsive nature whole ever let you), I look forward to your next laughable but pitiable post
You're not making any sense here.
You need your nap and try not to exert too much when moving around with your cane.
Your dementia must be acting up.
Stop stalking me on my own thread. :P
You need your nap and try not to exert too much when moving around with your cane.
Your dementia must be acting up.
Stop stalking me on my own thread. :P
I think you're the guy that saw the provider tbh. Otherwise you wouldn't be dredging up old stuff.... Just saying... That's what your little "vendetta" is proving mister _________
Unfortunately, Your assumptions are completely wrong. I came across sookie's profile only recently and that's how I got a whiff of her shocking 6 month old reviews.
My vendetta, if you will call it that, only began to get more personal after Sookie's lame response, attacking my post. The post was legitimate yet she goes off on a completely different tangent and talks about my use of alias. What does my alias have anything to do with her actions anyway? Diversion tactics!
She could have easily explained what went on... but nope
just looking for a reaction I gues
Thought that people should be aware of the absurdity
If it was inappropriate the mod would take it down.
Now I know to avoid her.thanks for the info