I wish there was a way to put our own feedback on some of the reviews, I am not a modest girl, but I am not delusional either.  I do except that everyone has different ideas of beauty and that is what makes the world so diverse... and that goodness for that.

My last review from the member Derringer, although I am entirely flattered, ups my 'looks' rating to 9, which I think is a little high, but I was his first and that should be taken in to account.

I consider myself overal looks rating a 7.5, highest 8.  If we were talking just face, I would say I was a 9, but I do have a body too, and that I would give a 6.5 or 7, which averages out to between 7.5 and 8.  I guess this is unnecessary, but I do not wish to mis-represent myself in any way.  If you are looking for a young, hot bodied, hard bodied girl... do not bother with me.  If you are looking for a sweet lady, in her late 20s, with nice womanly curves and sweet lips, a sensual style, well, well, well, you cannot go wrong with me.  

xoxox
Anik

-- Modified on 12/26/2004 10:58:50 AM

"The absence of flaw in beauty is itself a flaw."
-- Havelock (Henry) Ellis (1859 - 1939), from
  Impressions and Comments (1914)

To learn more about Henry Ellis, try this link:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/TUhavelock.htm

Also, I want to say that I stand by my 9 rating of Anik. Yes, she was my first provider, but that did not cloud my thinking. I agree that I might have gone a little overboard if I had given her a 10. But her look is exactly what I like: a very beautiful brunette, with a curvy, super-sexy body -- exactly what I like. (For more on this issue, see my post to Adrenaline's question "A weighty issue" above.)

One thing not mentioned that I also factored into my rating was her personality. She is an *awesome* lady.

My wife and I are looking for a place to get drunk on New Year's eve. Is the place where you're bartending open to the public?