This might be a question for the site managers, but I will direct the question for those of you who post more reviews more than me.  In the new DC reviews posted on 3/3 there is a new review for Nene.  The review has no ad, or website link and the email given is one no longer in service from the days of angel-exotics.  Isn't that part of the criteria for posting reviews.  I know I have personally had reviews rejected because by the time the review got screened the providers add was no longer on Eros.  Am I missing something or are there exceptions to the rule that I missed in reading rules?

the review process right now is lacking. If enough people use the "contact us" button at the bottom of every page and complain, hopefully they will get the wheel back on the wagon soon.

Couldn't agree more.  Reviews of reviews is taking way too long.

You were right to sound the alarm. Sounds like a phoney review to me. Pretty
sure shes been out of the area for a good while. And he states he saw her on BP.
Well where is the link. Know you can do better than this TER.

I've had mixed results, but every once in a while the problem is corrected, and you might get a couple VIP days.

75% of my problem reports are rewarded. Just point them out if you find them.