I recently posted, 11/19/2012 7:54:18 AM , a list of about eighteen “visiting” advertisers whose pictures come from stock photo companies, model mayhem, or UK escort sites.  The women always list only a phone number and/or an email address.  But it’s pretty obvious that something is wrong with the ad, but I’ve gotten accustomed to stopping the frauds, so maybe other people do not notice.  (NO TER review-ignore her!!!)

But I recently noticed a thread by someone ripped off by one the “permanent” EROS advertisers.  There are women who have been around for months or YEARS.  Presently, EROS is posting

Francine
Victoria
DESTANEY
Connie
Rachel
Shakila
Lucie (maybe)
Charlotte
Amanda
Julianna
Vashtee
Patty
Jessika
Ellen
Savhanna
Anna
Jolene
Tracy
Gabby
Gloria
Cameron
Gennifer
ALEXIS
Reece

These twenty four women rip people off, and when a terrible TER review is posted, simply change their name and phone number.

For about a year a friend of mine kept a table of names, phone numbers, TER review IDs which he gave to me when he retired from the hobby.  

Would it be of help to periodically update and post my friend’s table in the format

EROS url
Name of advertiser
TER ID number or other site proving woman is a rip-off

which I used when I posted a few days ago.  The posting would include the twenty or so “permanent” rip-offs and the updated “traveling” rip-offs.  Would that help anyone?  We’re talking about forty of the two hundred posting on the EROS site that are fraudulent.  (NO TER review-ignore her!!!)

...I am almost done with playing the field at this point, but certain I will dip into new waters from time to time.  I would send ya a damn contribution from time to time to do so !

Appreciated.

Any maybe you can contact TER and so if they would open a "fraud alert" board where you can post?

It would be a service above and beyond the call of duty! I, for one, would find it totally valuable. The only thing missing would be the other side of the coin ... An all-star list of those who look TGTBT who actually ARE that good!

That would be appreciated.  My very first time, I was ripped off by Rachel.

Some of my observations:

Many of the women are nice, wholesome, classy looking; a few are bombshells.

None shows any erogenous zones in her pics.  Lingerie or cleavage, perhaps, but no bare breasts.

Most are priced about $160-$200 per hour.

Often their height reads, "stands at ...." The strange use of the preposition "at" suggests a common source.

Good Work:
On today's "new review" poster BZonga420 writes about "Summer" a BackPage girl andhow he got ripped off.
Her ad is on BackPage (Northern Virginia) under "Red Hair, Smokin Hot, Sultry" with her phone number
772-419-8124 (Florida - Vero Beach) she lists Out-Call only for $160.  When google searching her phone
number no TER reviews or other reviews of any kind come up on search (until now).Google image search
reveals your first clue - the photos "Summer" is using are those of a model, unless this model is now
outcall escorting you can conclude she is a fake.  

Intrigued I called her number and she answered - Summer wanted to know my street address - I declined to give it to her - and I begged off saying "I was just shopping around and hadn't made-up my mind - but if I do narrow it down to you - I will call you back."  Then a few minutes later another female voiced call me (571-721-8807) and wanted to arrange the meeting between Summer and me.

This let me to conclude that caller was her handler. Google searching the 571-721-8897 phone number produced no useful information.  What I am led to conclude is the "ring" is located in a 571 area code, advertises on BP, uses model photos, and as the TER reviewer; says once she arrives at his residence - she gets paid first then goes into her role of wanting to see his ID and having him sign a statement - all of that and burns the time up.

The simple lesson is use TER and avoid BP "outcalls".

Please back channel me.  I find your list of attributes interesting since you have some that I have not noticed.  I have been using a different set of criteria, and maybe I can combine them.

Would be nice if TER came up with a quick read chart of the rip-offs so people could see that info without having to dig through info.  The easier it is to discover the rip-offs the less money they'll be able to scam and the quicker they'll be gone.  What I see is too many scammers taking too many people.  The easier it is for people to scam the more scammers there will be

The girl now going by Julianna, but she had a different name than I can't recall.  It was obnoxious.  She actually looked like the pic, maybe even better looking.  She even seemed very nice.  It was a total scam.  She just wanted to "talk".  

I might add something that nobody else has commented on.  It is easy to get angry with these girls, but it is a dangerous game they are playing.  I think they assume that this is all a safe is shady way to make money, but there are bad actors out there who may get violent with them if cheated some day.  It is bad for us, but it is hazardous for these girls if they should rip-off the wrong guy.  Somebody is using them badly.