Washington DC

Re: Yeah, Right, Um...
repo-guy 18 Reviews 778 reads
posted

thanks for standing up for my legit status.   I've been around for years (although I just started writing reviews), and there are a number of providers [who I have not written reviews for] who could vouch for my status.  As for any incentive, 1) be careful what you imply unless you know what you're talking about, and 2) I started writing as a community service to counter-balance an unfavorable review that was written about a really solid provider. . . and as for the issue of plagiarism, I think my review pre-dated the other guy.

MaîtreD*Obvious1204 reads

I can't say it is a fake review, but isn't it a tad obvious?

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=177271

repo-guy's review has been up for several days. The review by markodtech, the only review by him, came up today.

Common passages, copied word for word:

"Anni is tall with a pretty face and sexy body. Everything about her is natural and well-proportioned."

"The session was straightforward and very enjoyable."

"Anni was relaxed and playful. "

"Annie is a fun gal, a great time and a memorable GFE." (Even the typo "Annie" is copied)

If you want to copy, at least change a few words.

Most hobbyist always take a first time reviewer for a provider with few reviews with a grain of salt anyway.  Having said that, this guy perhaps was given an incentive or special request to write a review and obliged.  I am not saying this is the situation at hand but unless you are asking TER to read every review and match them against other reviews submitted in a particular time period this is a moot point. Therefore one can use their own judgement and come to the same conclusion as the OP that the review is bogus, so the OP point is moot.

Does it even make a difference? Repo-guy has several reviews and is legit. I dont blame him for copying and pasting some things. What's the point of this, I don't understand. If his experience is similar, then let the man do his thing. It doesn't hurt the outcome of the provider, and most people would just glimpses by this & not even recognize it. I really don't understand your point. I guess you are trying to say, that he was lazy and & decided to paraphrase some of the quotes--its nothing wrong with that. Please excuse my ignorance if I am missing something.

ReadingTeacher864 reads

Don't take it personal. There are many very bright people who have difficulty with reading.

The review in question  by the OP was not about Repo Guy but copying by markodtech.

That review has been removed

thanks for standing up for my legit status.   I've been around for years (although I just started writing reviews), and there are a number of providers [who I have not written reviews for] who could vouch for my status.  As for any incentive, 1) be careful what you imply unless you know what you're talking about, and 2) I started writing as a community service to counter-balance an unfavorable review that was written about a really solid provider. . . and as for the issue of plagiarism, I think my review pre-dated the other guy.

I do know that guys are given incentives I've seen somke providers posts or other providers website.  Personally I only see highly reveiwed providers so I do not write reviews also

I've been a victim of almost word for word plagiarism of my reviews as well. At first I was like WTF and was going to complain, then I just said WHATEVER.  I knew I had a GREAT time and that's all that matters to me about the situation.

Register Now!