Rating:  8.5/9.5 (will round review to 9/9)

GFE:  Completely and consistently. DFK, DATY, BBBJDT FIV, MPCFS (she touches herself to an O during)

Rates:  300/60

Incall:  yes, NW DC

Photos:  accurate.   She looks most like the right two pics.  I had been resisting seeing her because I thought the left 3 pics made her look like a 7, but she's not.  (Beefeater's 9/9 is accurate).

Recommended:  Yes for all, but definitely for young spinner lovers.

Tell me where you see he commented on her with a 9/9?

Are you talking about this? http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=206290&boardID=6&page=

Hope not, can believe it would be the same girl from the pics.

I can't pass beyond the home page of this website. Anybody else experiencing the same problem?

Same here...would be nice to know which girl is where, website is a little " geocities-1995-esque".

The pictures on EROS are the same as the ones on the ECSC website (dark hair above the shoulders w/no tattoo's). Then there are slightly different pictures of Jasmine on FreePost (lighter brown hair below shoulders with what looks like a small tattoo above her rear). Can you please tell me which photo's more accurately reflect what she looks like at present? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

Definitely looks more like pics on website - hair is shorter like that, and body is thin/petite with no baby fat that the other pics show.  All natural I think - I don't remember any tats or piercings.  Definitely no implants.  Also, specifically, to me she looks most like the right 2 pics on the website, which are better/cuter than the left 3 pics.  She is better looking than all of her pics in person IMHO.  (very young looking though - she told me she is 22 like it says on Eros, but she looks 18.)

Exactly what I was hoping to hear, thanks!