Washington DC

Re: Valarie Anderson
holystonethedeck 104 Reviews 6524 reads
posted
1 / 41

It's been a while since JM has been mentioned here and I'm wondering what the latest opinions are of the agency.

I'm on their mailing list and see they have some really hot looking girls lately so I was wondering if I should maybe try them out.  

Any opinions appreciated.

TheRedOne789 136 reads
posted
2 / 41

Surely, all the text screenshots that are included in the newsletter are fake? They're all in the exact same format lol

cks175 51 Reviews 115 reads
posted
3 / 41

I’ve seen my text show up in the profiles. They come off as authentic to me.

Flava-Papa-McGreedy 110 reads
posted
4 / 41

The texts are very authentic.  I know because one of them is mine

Posted By: cks175
Re: Fake text screenshots (Authentic)
I’ve seen my text show up in the profiles. They come off as authentic to me.

Ali2 116 reads
posted
5 / 41

I am another whose post-coital texts have shown up in the ads. I think that they are legit. And notice that for some girls there aren't any.  

 
I wish there were more frequent, early during visit, reviews of their models.

cageyboy 25 Reviews 56 reads
posted
6 / 41

If the fake photos are true, I'm not surprised. This was a slipshod agency from the starting gate. Devaluing the client has been it's core mission, the cornerstone of it's approach to doing business. Dwindling competition has kept this agency alive. As far as I know, the there's only one other agency in town left that offers an alternative to Russians and Brazilians.

FoxFire66 22 Reviews 124 reads
posted
7 / 41

Funny thing - I was literally just now looking around and asked myself "I wonder why there are so few TER reviews for their ladies" then I remembered I was there last weekend and never got around to doing a review.  

Anyway, there's been some complaints over the years about this agency but I use them on and off and have never had a problem. Let's face it, this is a human endeavor and sometimes the ladies have off days or you just don't click with them.  

The pictures are definitely glammed up and photoshopped but I'm not sure I'd go as far as saying they're totally fake.  More like "industry standard" upgrades IMHO.  

I've been happy with their decent Tyson's location and their easy scheduling.  Short notice (which is always my situation) has never been a problem, and the ladies have always been somewhere between good and very good. In 6-8 visits over the past two years I haven't had a miss yet. But I've also never really had a homerun or found a new ATF.  

So: Good ladies + good prices + decent location + easy scheduling = I'd give them a try.  

Hope this helps.  

accidentalhobbiest 113 reads
posted
8 / 41

Have been decent for me too but their reputation is so bad I refuse to take one for the team. One of girls currently here looks great but has zero reviews

tofo3569 98 Reviews 114 reads
posted
9 / 41

I had a considerable amount of fun with Melody Taylor and Avery Taylor. Separately.

Irrelevant1 97 Reviews 132 reads
posted
10 / 41

Nice to hear. Avery Taylor has been on my list since she was Bella with Touring Girls, but I missed out on this visit again.  

Melody is still here, and she’s caught my eye as well. Might be time to book an appointment.

Flava-Papa-McGreedy 126 reads
posted
11 / 41

I’m not sure why there is so much negativity about them but I’ve used them a lot over the years.  I have 0 complaints about them nor the authenticity of the pictures.  You check my reviews.  I have nothing to gain by defending them but only sharing my experiences over the years.

Flava-Papa-McGreedy 110 reads
posted
12 / 41

I saw her during the TER blackout, so I didn’t review her.  She is in the top 5 I’ve seen in or out of the hobby.  She is very beautiful

boondocks84 115 reads
posted
13 / 41

I must be one of the only dudes who had a less then stellar session from her. The fact that she spoke zero English didnt help. She was nice to look at but zero chemistry.

SinCitySinner 122 reads
posted
14 / 41

I agree with the most that they use doctored pics of girls who have close resemblance with them...

 
Couple of times they got busted here, and then Jen fake fired her girl..LOL.. That was funny..  

 
But here is the thing.. The girls can be between a 6 and a 9 both in looks and service. They are not cash and dash. Some pretty good talent there.. Do I wish  they didn't use fake pics? Yes.. Hell yes.. But then again I have wished and not wished lot of things.. It don't mean shit..  It is what it is..  

 
If you like the review.. Go and see the person..

-- Modified on 10/28/2021 7:02:33 PM

SinCitySinner 110 reads
posted
15 / 41

What reviews? You have no reviews..

zellfreddy 17 Reviews 118 reads
posted
16 / 41

I think she just uses whatever pics the girls provide her, so sometimes they're fake sometimes they're not. On an android, you can long-press an image and then click "search on Google images.

I did that once and all of the pictures being used were cropped versions of a very famous model. And no, I don't think it was actually the model lol. If a girl has any fully clothed pics try it out

cageyboy 25 Reviews 121 reads
posted
17 / 41

"Anyway, there's been some complaints over the years about this agency but I use them on and off and have never had a problem."

In other words, the proprietor of JM decided not to piss all over him as she has done to other clients.

FoxFire66 22 Reviews 119 reads
posted
18 / 41

That's a fair point.  Maybe I've just been lucky?  Who knows - YMMV I guess.  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 121 reads
posted
19 / 41

While I cannot really verify the voracity, it is rather a red flag.

cks175 51 Reviews 125 reads
posted
20 / 41

I was told that…
While I cannot really verify the voracity…
The “veracity” is unverified and second hand. You’re referring to a very old rumor that hasn’t been directly addressed first hand in god knows how long, if ever.
it is rather a red flag
If there’s a rumor running around that you yourself admit lacks veracity, why assign it a red flag? Wouldn’t the red flags be assigned to situations you knew were true, in other words, facts? Maybe refine your system to assign yellow flags to rumors that lack veracity.

In any case, your propensity to lump fact and fiction together is one of the big reasons so many here at TER have come to the conclusion that you’re full of shit.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 136 reads
posted
21 / 41

I thought the monger who gave me info was quite trustworthy. Now a few months later, I'm not entirely sure, as he has done some stuff I found questionable in terms of truth telling. Still, I respect his opinion and am more inclined to believe him than not. He told me that the PO monitored the forums.  

 
Any potential rumor is a red flag. Better be safe than sorry. Why would you go to an agency that blacklists for writng honest reviews?

-- Modified on 11/9/2021 2:00:15 AM

Mister_Pelican 49 Reviews 127 reads
posted
22 / 41

In the past, JM always had a great mix of providers, both voluptuous girls and spinners.  There was something for everyone's tastes.  But over the course of the last year or so, it seems like Jen is only offering voluptuous girls.  I prefer spinners, so this means most of the girls have not appealed to me.  I doubt this is a conscious choice by Jen or her fault -- she only has the girls who approach her to work with.  It's just disappointing for me.

Overall I've had great experiences with the agency.  Easy to book, girls are on time, looks & performance are satisfactory, and the price is reasonable.  

My only complaint is that several times in the past I tried to use JM as a reference to be verified at other agencies, but Jen didn't always respond.  I'm sure I'm in good standing with her -- she's always quick to book me.  I don't know if she was too busy, offended that I didn't check with her first about using her as a reference, or just didn't like the competition.

One last point: I don't think they use fake photos.  Sometimes the photos are glammed up or old, but it's always the real girl. As someone else mentioned, I believe Jen uses whatever photos the providers give her.

3270925 11 Reviews 106 reads
posted
23 / 41

I enjoy using JM.  She is my go-to agency - always.  Yes, the "selection" type has varied from years past.  But, I feel it has more to do with the personnel in the industry, travel access, and COVID.  IMy #2 ATF is from JM and I'm waiting on her return.

I find JM very friendly and easy to work with.  Never had an issue.

Mister_Pelican 49 Reviews 96 reads
posted
24 / 41

I agree that Jen is great and easy to work with.  And I agree it's not her fault that she's had less variety lately in terms of body types.  Covid has certainly been a big factor.  My comment wishing she had still had an eclectic selection of providers wasn't meant as a criticism of her.  I was just expressing disappointment about the situation and a hope that the variety picks back up in the future.

cageyboy 25 Reviews 110 reads
posted
25 / 41

Jennifer's Models is a lousy agency. It's had a history of bait an  switching, and the  individual in charge, whoever it is, is mentally unstable.

cks175 51 Reviews 97 reads
posted
26 / 41

Disagree. I’ve had nothing but great experiences with JM.

Mister_Pelican 49 Reviews 93 reads
posted
27 / 41

I've seen dozens of girls with JM.  None of them have been bait-and-switch.
.
There were a few that used older, glammed up photos that might not have accurately reflected their untouched, current appearance, but they were definitely the girl in the photo.

cageyboy 25 Reviews 95 reads
posted
28 / 41

Posted By: cks175
Re: Regular
Disagree. I’ve had nothing but great experiences with JM.
I disagree. I had a lousy experience out of the starting gate with the maniac running that establishment. As for the bait and switching problems in that place, read the RO board.

cageyboy 25 Reviews 86 reads
posted
29 / 41

Posted By: lurker316
Re: Regular
I've seen dozens of girls with JM.  None of them have been bait-and-switch.  
 .  
 There were a few that used older, glammed up photos that might not have accurately reflected their untouched, current appearance, but they were definitely the girl in the photo.
Read the RO board, and you will discover a number of instances of bait and switching from this agency.

1980STT 92 Reviews 100 reads
posted
30 / 41

I have seen many of their ladies over the last couple years.  None of which have been "bait and switch".  Perhaps you have bad luck.

hornyhornet 36 Reviews 97 reads
posted
31 / 41

I was hoping to get back into the hobby and JM was my go to but I have seen very few providers listed with none most of the time. Does someone know what's going on?

AnonymousAlias987654321 115 reads
posted
32 / 41

It’s been this way with JM for a few months now. My guess is that she can’t find anyone to come on your here.

SpiroPappas 115 Reviews 96 reads
posted
33 / 41

I've used them a lot and I've only had one bad experience with them and that was with the scheduler not the talent.  
 Maybe others have had bad luck and YMMV, but for the most part the ladies are very good and are let go if they do not meet expectations.  I will say I would stay away from newer girls as those are the ones that seem to have the most issues.  

scarboy 26 Reviews 106 reads
posted
34 / 41

In my several years experience with JM, your assertions are simply untrue.

AnonymousAlias987654321 97 reads
posted
35 / 41

How can his “assertions” that are based on his own experiences be “untrue”? He states that he hasn’t encountered any “bait and switches”.  

You say that you have based on your own experiences.  

Both statements can be true. 🤷🏻‍♂️

1980STT 92 Reviews 96 reads
posted
36 / 41

Yes, JM hasn't had many models in for the last several months.  It's odd.  Before, there would be 2-3 at any time.  There's a few I'm hoping return, but yet to see.  But, I use another agency and they are fairly steady.  Hopefully summer JM has more!

colguy1981 103 reads
posted
37 / 41

JM has a new girl available. Has anyone seen her?

I am interested in seeing her but I email JM asking for reviews or where she was from and never got a response. I have seen a few if her providers. Two were absolutely amazing but the others so so and the reality didn't not come close to their pics.

Would be great to hear about Valarie before booking.

LoveAll 96 reads
posted
38 / 41

They bait and switch ALOT beware.

DaTrufe 110 reads
posted
39 / 41

Most likely Latino/Spanish they want answer if you ask the ethnicity/race. Some reviewers actually lie about ethnicity and put white, then when you show up, the lady speaks only Spanish, the games we play.

Seems Latinos & Asians be on their grind, hard to get other flavors in bunches..

Have Fun

yoyospa 105 Reviews 88 reads
posted
40 / 41

Don't bother. I was supposed to see Valerie this afternoon but it never happened. After setting up the appt yesterday the booker went dark all day today. Ignored texts, phone call, email over several hours where I was trying to confirm the date. This left me scrambling to find a plan B. Several hours later, I get a reply to my texts saying they had reports of bad service and decided to send the girl packing. (FWIW, Valerie is still listed on the website as available.)

Running an agency with the communication skills of a low-rent provider is my version of bad service. Put me down as another dissatisfied customer. JM is scratched off my list.

Irrelevant1 97 Reviews 117 reads
posted
41 / 41

A review for her popped up a few days ago. Per the reviewer, hot but limited menu. It’s a moot point I guess, if she’s been given the boot by JM…

Register Now!