Mini-reviews MUST be followed within 72 hours by the posting of a full review.

Since the moderators do not have insight into the review process, we have begun requiring that the review be approved before allowing another mini-review by a poster.  It is the only way that we can make sure that the rules are followed as they should be.

For example, if Joe posts a mini-review on Dec 1, he must follow-up and submit his full review by Dec 3.  Let's assume that his review is then approved on Dec 15. He may NOT post another mini-review between the dates of Dec 1 and Dec. 15.

RC

I posted a review back the beginning of this year for my ATF (Amber Reese).  I saw her right before she retired.  By the time my review was looked at, her webpage had been pulled and my review was rejected.  I didn't say anthing at the time because I was hopefull she would reapear and I could see her again and write a review.  About a month ago, I gave up on her reappearing and wrote to TER asking for them to consider allowing my review.  Afterall it was a real review posted within the TER time constraints.  Keep in mind that I'm a paying TER member, so I had nothing to gain but the fact that I had my ATF review in my history.  TER denied my request stating the review was out of the TER time constraints now and that all reviews have to have a valid website.  What a crock............  I'm all for following the rules, but as a paying customer, I would have thought I would have gotten a little common sense consideration.  Oh wellllllllllll, nothing I can do but accept............