Cara is a very attractive 5’6” hazel-eyed blonde in her mid-20s; originally from Upstate New York, but most recently from Florida. She has worked as a print model and done some acting (no not during our session).  Her body is well-toned and a tantalizing 34B-25-37 as depicted in her pictures.  I was fortunate enough to see her immediately after her photo shoot shortly after her arrival. She indicated she was not new to the business, but she was no seasoned veteran either. Her personality is enticing, her appearance is inviting, and her performance was exciting as she delivered a most pleasant and satisfying GFE session. An exceptional kisser, Cara is equally content leading or following, but either way she will take you where you want to go. I have no qualms about recommending her!

Location: Tysons Corner
Photos: Accurate+
GFE: Yes
Services: DFK DATY BBBJ DT MPCFS
Fee: $$$
Rating: 8/8+
Recommended: Yes!

Full review to follow.

An 8 rating for looks? What are they hiding?

I totally disagree w/review.  Face was attractive. The body was thicker than it appears in her photos. The breasts were pretty small too. Looks 7-8.

Performance wasn't good. BBBJ was a mix of HJ and wanting to put condom on right away.  We did MCFS - each position she would position herself in a way so as to allow minimum penetration. Performance 3.

Every customer works hard for their money. When it's wasted like this others should be warned. This is good so the providers that do provide good service get rewarded. And the ones who don't will learn either to leave the business or change - they'll change since nobody sees them.

I hope I've helped my fellow mongers/brothers out.

Seems a clear case of YMMV. Your minimum review record suggests the problem has more to do with you and less with the providers! Some top notch providers got pretty low scores from you.

That service seems to use moderately heavy Photoshop on all their girls.  

Sometimes they use it like Playboy used to airbrush... just to make the skin look very (and artificially) smooth, tanned and glowing.

In other cases they use it to remove tattoos.

I know one situation where I perceived they used it to trim her down a bit (though she was still a nine in real life).

I wish they wouldn't do it.

At least when nlackew is being critical of another post, he has the balls to use his primary name.

This post, because it is made using an alias, is absolute bullshit - pointing the finger at someone while hiding your identity is totally lame. Hey, maybe you work for the agency (although I doubt it - i doubt Lisa would get her panties in a bunch about one post), maybe you're a shill for the agency (again, I doubt it), maybe you're the provider being reviewed, maybe you're one of these nancies who is so grateful that some broad will touch his dick that he falls in love for every one he's with, maybe you have less reviews than nlacklew, maybe...well, you get the picture.

Grow some balls Thomas. If you're going to call bullshit on someone, you need at least a smidgen of credibility yourself.

His review record speaks for itself.

Why don't YOU speak for YOURself?

Not to take anything away from TBM, since all ratings are subjective, and I have a lot of ratings equals to his......but I respect nlackew for posting under his name.  I also respect that he's a tough grader.  (I compared the six girls we've seen in common, and at least in looks, we've got 2 of 6 the same, 3 of 6 where I'm 1 point higher, 1 of the 6 where I'm 2 points higher).  That's something I find highly credible - that I can work with and respect.  Those hobbyists who have all 8's, 9's and 10's (or over half of girls at 9s and 10's), how can other hobbyists differentiate among girls you've rated when every single one is rated that highly?  That defeats a valuable "consumer reports" purpose of this board for hobbyists, just as nlackew comments I think.

Which is why I won't defend my rating. Two different people, two different experiences, and two different expectations. I interact a lot differently than others...so all I can comment on is my session.

I have and I think the criticism is more a factor of the critic's attitude than the quality of the service. I think the original reviewer captured it best. He obviously treated the provider in a way that gained him a better time. Most times if you treat a lady like a lady it is rewarded. I too have seen the lady in question and she is far better than a "3" in performance so until you've done the same withhold your comment.

I know everyone's waiting for my reply LOL.  Well here it is.

First, Brandel and Lynchman, thanks for the backing.  You and other reviewers (they've emailed privately) make me feel that I can continue to give honest reviews. I come from the InternatioalSexGuide forum/world where reviews are a lot more graphic and blunt.  It's probably this way since it hasn't been infiltrated by Agencies and Independants.  If anyone there gives a timid, inaccurate or non-detailed review they would get ripped. And their reputations soiled.  Let's not forget, TER is for the hobbyist.

Second, it's all about Quality, not quantity.  Brandel said it perfectly - what good is 50 reviews that are all 9/9, 9/10 etc. when you can't differentiate good from bad.  It's like an NBA scout saying that 'Oh yeah, I saw Brandel hit some jumpshots, a layup...he plays like Lebron James!'

Brandel mentioned that he appreciated that I was critical and that did give me pause to think as to why. First, I'm fortunate to travel a lot internatioally and the girls are really Playboy quality.  Especially Eastern Europe. Poverty does have it's good points... For some reason, I only tend to write reviews when I feel a girl hasn't been depicted properly.  For example, we all know Meagan from ClassyDC has several reviews and they're all pretty dead on, I don't feel the need to contribute since it's all been said.  I'll spend the time writing a review on someone who hasn't been depicted properly.

Third, agencies have a love/hate relationship to our reviews.  In the end, I believe they like it.  Why?  Because it is FEEDBACK on there business operations.  It benefits them.  They will correct things and make things better.  If a girl does something that we don't like, e.g., ask for a tip even though service was bad and the agency doesn't know - guess what, she won't get repeat business and the owners are left scratching their heads.  But if they catch it in time via a review and say 'Hey, clients in DC don't put up with that shit. They'll tip if they feel compelled to. Show them a good time and you'll be very successful here because you can develop a solid client base that has plenty of disposable income and are respectful to girls' - the situation could be salvaged.

Lastly, there are some reviewers that I follow and email who's reputations are solid.  If they give a girl a 9/9, 8/9 etc., I'm going to see them. No question. I hope this is the case w/me as well.

I agree with the subjectiveness of reviews. At least from a looks perspective, I've been "burned" by seeing gals that were given 8-9's on here and I would've only given 6-7's too...but alas it's all in the eyes of the beholder. I rate the gals based on how I would see them in the "real world" i.e. would I approach them at a bar, bookstore etc etc...

But as far as performance is concerned, the YMMV can go a long way if you do treat the lady with respect.

Well now, I'm totally confused.  Too see or not to see?

I'll certainly follow your reviews in the future. TER can be very helpful - it would be more so without people who seem to have an agenda other than objective reviews for the benefit of other hobbyists. Then add that to the ability to propagate these agendas anonymously, and things can get confusing very quickly - especially for the new kids.

This tee's up your last point. I've found some reviewers who seem to be on par with me - and I pay attention to them much more closely.

OK, I'm done here - move along, move along...

I wish I could help you make up your mind. I noted that of the 6 girls we've seen in common, you rated 4 higher and 2 equal to me. However, I also noted that of the 6 girls nlackew and I saw in common, we only had a major disagreement on 2. Too bad this ain't a science, but that's what happens when personalities get thrown into the mix. Good luck! I hope it works out for you and others.

and your reviews claim levels of service that generally exceed those claimed by others.

Perhaps as you assert, this is because you "interact diffently than others" which I read as a claim of some kind of superiority.

I'm glad you are having fun and contributing, but I take everything you report with a large grain of salt.

Nor do I frankly give a fuck!

not that I give a fuck LOL

...responding to an alias, but:

1) the services claimed in my reviews are accurate.
2) I didn't mean to imply any superiority or special status, I only meant to imply that no 2 people interact exactly alike so the result is usually somewhat different, and finally
(3) I don't really care one way or another whether anyone values my review...I write them as honestly and accurately as possible in an effort to assist other hobbyists and have always been willing to answer more specific queries from legitimate hobbyists. So I'm truly sorry if you don't take them with a grain of salt, but that's your right.

This is not a science.
Some times our experiences differ.

Chemistry and how the girl is feeling can make a difference.  Big time !!

When our Banana friend sees a girl, he is writing his experience.  He is not getting any bonus from it. The point of this game is to heads up the better girls.

BTW, some guys like me enjoy girls with small breasts and big, real tits.  
Other guys like a girl with a big cushion, you know, with someting they can hold unto.

Guys, forget the Alias bullshit and post your opinions.

Well I have, just gotta find the time to do it.. Thanks.