I'm trying to see to what extent "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder".  

My guess is that this girl is easily 9 or better to vast majority of guys (with hardly anyone thinking she's a mere 5 or 6), but that's just my opinion.  

So, what's your appearance rating for this girl?

Not a shill post because she's not a provider as far as I know.
If she IS, I'd be booking an overnight with her... like, yesterday!

A 10!!!!!

She looks amazing.....but young.

but maybe too much makeup to know for sure

Posted By: JustCantGetEnough

I'm trying to see to what extent "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder".  

My guess is that this girl is easily 9 or better to vast majority of guys (with hardly anyone thinking she's a mere 5 or 6), but that's just my opinion.  

So, what's your appearance rating for this girl?

Not a shill post because she's not a provider as far as I know.
If she IS, I'd be booking an overnight with her... like, yesterday!

an 8  Nice ass, pretty face, legs are a little thin for my taste, love long hair but too stringy looking, tits?

even if she's a T girl!  Which I doubt.

10 for me.  Let me know if she is a provider, and I'll book in a heartbeat!

Model material!

Great ass, pretty face & hair, really nice legs and back, could be a 10 depending on breasts. I would definitely schedule if she was a provider.

a nine even with no frontal view

Tons of facial photos (not "facial" as in the hobby lol)
but frontal photos that show her face.

there is very little erotic about this picture. she looks like a little girlplaying with mom's naughty clothes.

i would not be moved to book or even make contact.

This is shocking to me. But I guess it illustrates the idea behind "to each their own"

You know damn well you would be all over that if you got the chance. You can't fool me!

don't get grumpy that it's turning out differently than you expected.....

She doesn't look THAT young to me, most likely early 20s maybe.
Even if she's 18, I don't mind 18 year olds either... Not much younger than I am because I'm still in my early 20s (mentally) as far as I know. Physically, now that's a different story.

I too agree with the responder that I'm a bit surprised but seeing differences in opinion is precisely what I was looking for in this thread.

Can you post a photo of who YOU think is 9 or 10?  

It has to be "non-provider" or the post won't stay up, and you can't post photos of my secret girlfriend, err, your wife.

on GD some weeks ago. i did that sine i think the girls i've rated at 10 have her beat and yes the pic was of a model.

i think we both know this isn't turning out as you thought it would. so i'll ignore the other bait you've set.

beauty IS in the eye of the behoder.

she looks abysmally young and childish to me in this pic. and although i still think of myself as 18, i want someone who knows what to do.

which of my ex wives did you say was your GF? one said that she dumped you cause she "couldn't feel a thing".

How could any body live up to a fantasy of perfection...

Your Mom is pretty hot though,

But I'd like to see her up close and personal to give her a true appearance rating

http://bodyrubs.cityvibe.com/escorts.php?do=view&p=71424

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=164786

Her TER profiles various so much; from 7's to 10's in looks.  She was a solid 8 MINIMUM in my book.  What made her super nice was that she was so TIGHT. Man oh man. The memories.

Might have to schedule a day trip to NYC soon.

I thought it was a reasonable question. So if you can answer the original question, why can't you post answering this?

Really? Why? It's a damn survey. Hell, if the ladies are able to post a photo theme why the hell can't we???

As of today, 12 people scored her a 9 or above. Sounds like  that is the  "majority".

One said 8 but he couldn't see her face. Two said 7. Your response on the other hand, very questionable being biased to "prove your point". Seems like.

I don't disagree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder but ONLY within a certain range, (a 9 to me is  a 10 to some, an 8 to a few.....
but still somewhere around a 9 to vast majority. Can't deviate much from there. )

As you can see from the survey, there ARE limits.

At a certain point, the difference in opinion is minimal. No 5 or 6 here. Now watch someone will say she is a 5 just to pull a claudius, lol

you aren't understanding the banter between him and i. there is a long history and many posts. as i noted below i've already posted what i thikn a 9 is..... don't need to repeat that.

a provider ad or shill post.

she looks absolutely perfect to me.

I used to think I could ever only give one "10" rating - after all "ONCE in a lifetime" is not an ambiguous statement.  However, if I can be a like a cat and have 9 tens in my life, I think she might be one.  In fact, could a give an 11?  Everything I can see (sans breast) looks about as good as it can get.  What's not to like.  As long as the age check passes.

assuming:

5 10s
7   9s
1   8
2   7s

the mean is 9 and the variance is 1. some responses were vague.

so the beta distribution model (if i've done the math right) sez:
probability of a rating 6 or lower is 1.7%
probability of a rating 7 or lower is 5.3%
probability of a rating 8 or lower is 14.8%
probability of a rating 9 or lower is 37.4%
probability of a rating 10 or lower is, of course, 100%.

so the model refutes your claim that NO ONE will rate her 6 or lower. the variance in the sample is too large.

don't cherry pick the data! LOL!

i can't fool you and don't need to: you have already fooled yourself.

from the posted pic only, NO WAY. i'm not a child molester.

i'd be much more comfortable about Farrah. i prefer Farrah's pics to the OP's picture.

search on "Martha Stewart" for 300 days and you should find it.

size dress .  A definitive ten on looks IMO.
 There are discrepancies on her age and height on different sites .
 I like the this one the best.

First Name: Catalina
Last Name: Otalvaro
Nationality: Colombia
Place of Birth: Cali, Valle del Cauca Colombia
Date of Birth: December 15, 1988
Eye Color: Blue
Hair Color: Brown
Height: 180cm - 5´11
Weight: 52 kg - 114 lbs
Measurements: 36D-24-36
Shoe Size: 9
Dress Size: 6

http://www.bellazon.org/catalina-otalvaro.html

yep a 10. she doesn't look like an underage little girl. still too young for me so she isn't picking up the phone from me, that's for sure. LOL!

who can't take a friendly banter or debate.  I do enjoy your statistical analysis and your posts are usually more intelligent than most people.

As a part theorist / part experimentalist, I like to run quasi-experiments. There are theories that make total mathematical sense... and then there's reality. Much of what I learned about science consists of trying to make sense out of discrepancies between what's observed versus the theoretical model.

The one alias experiment done earlier, showed that one alias is too easy to get 'outed'. (I'm sure many know who I am by now. LOL) In this debate, I think this little experiment proved that there are certainly set limits to this "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder" business. Now don't get me wrong though, I do in fact believe that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder to some extent ( I certainly don't think martha stewart is a 9)

As you know already, my stance is that the variance is much less than we think (assuming the same locale / era ). I think if we limit the audience to a certain age group, etc,... the variance might be even less.

If the measurements are correct, 36 hips on 5'4" height.... she isn't exactly the same figure as Catalina.

maybe not

my sense of humor being what it is, LOL!

after all the only disagreement we have is how large the variance is: is it larger than you think or smaller than i think?

VIVE LA VARIANCE!!!

if you start asking questions like that i'll have to charge you for answers!

thanks for playing.

its the most fun i've had on the board since the Great Alias Demise! (aka GAD)

Only referencing the fact if they were a Model, then they are Model material and could be considered a 9.

Of course maybe you meant that Martha Stewart was what you consider a 9.

In any case, forget I asked

Or are you afraid to let people know down deep inside you harbor that desire?

Seriously, the post had nothing to do with who you would fuck as much as who you thought was hot or not.

And you do know she is over 21 grandpa,

Hahaha, if not a child molester, a MILF molester maybe?

I complement your discernment. Many folks assumed I thought Martha was a 9.

What I was claiming is that IF one is going to claim that ratings can be objective then one would have to consider Martha Stewart a 9 since she was obviously model material: i.e. an actual professional model.

Now I wouldn't call up a MS-in-her-heyday look alike EITHER, just not my type. But from an "objective" POV if someone claims that she can't possibly be a 9.... well, they must concede that they aren't being objective.

For 8s, 9s and 10s that I WOULD call up... see my reviews

But when you were asked what you considered a 9 in response to your giving her a 7, you referred to your post on the GD board, which you never gave an example of for someone who was not a provider. Yet now you suggest I look up your reviews to see what you consider a 9 or 10? Again, off topic since this discussion is not about what we have reviewed, or who we have reviewed, but about others outside.

No matter, no point, since I don't see any way to be objective about ones personal point of view, that's clearly subjective isn't it.

I still think you the hots for a MS look alike from back in the day, or since you think the original was a bit too young, maybe even MS as she is today, go on admit it, you want to do Martha Stewart don't ya.

there are 9s i would call for an appointment and 9s that i would not. there are those pretty and nice to look at without wanting to touch versus those you just want to get next to ASAP.

My current ATF is a 9.5 I'm bed but 7 for looks (just don't tell her please)

I gave up in the eye candy long ago.

for some reason it made me think of a little girl... under 18 who was trying on Mom's naughty nightwear. so it struck me as not that hot, a 7 tops, as i said.

quadseasonal posted a pic that looked much more mature sexually which i gave a 10.

i found it interesting that the pose could have such a large influence on how i would rate: a swing of 3.

hmmmm.... last i checked, i don't molest. if the person is in no condition to give informed consent (too dim, too young, or too drunk or otherwise intoxicated) it is a HUGE turn off and she gets cab fare home.

...she is gorgeous and I love her azz!!