Washington DC

Which agency in DC do you recommend? Safe? Most discreet?
MarineCorps 563 reads
posted

thinking about using one, but I don't know how much info they want and would retain. You guys remember what happened in that DC Madam Case a few years ago, right?

Sara's a true professional and the ladies are all GREAT!

hmmmmmmmmmmm746 reads

Didn't one of the desirable companions girls get caught last year?
How are they still around?

Just because the girl is caught does not mean the agency has fallen too.

Just taking a wild ass hypothesis here, but a reputable agency is quick to react when one of their girls get busted. They send over a lawyer (who's already on retainer) to bail out the girl before she gets too scared and starts spilling the beans.

The agency owner is never in question because the girl who was busted probably doesn't know either.

If I was running an agency, I'd never be stupid enough to reveal any of my real info even to the most trusted girl.

Many agencies in the area don't even reveal the name of the client to the girl. IMHO it's a bit dangerous for the girl, but more secure for the agency itself.  

All that the girl would have is the agency's number, website, maybe a general whereabouts of the owner, but usually nothing personally identifying.

At any rate, Desirable is still alive and kickin. It's not just my two cents but a fact.

as some of the other local agencies, but fewer issues overall I'd say. PGFE also weeds out problem ladies (when they do sneak in) pretty quickly (if you let them know).

Agreed. The one thing I like about Pure is you don't get the feeling your being rushed because other appts are stacked up behind you. My impression is the girls are all local.

Posted By: MarineCorps
thinking about using one, but I don't know how much info they want and would retain. You guys remember what happened in that DC Madam Case a few years ago, right?

conspiracytheories568 reads

history has shown if they get caught or for any reason get exposed to LE, they will hand you and other clients over on a silver platter!.

JMHO

Yes that is correct. And PGF will ask you for your real name and even employment info in some cases.

Be very wary of providing such info.

Quite correct. If you are ok with your real name getting out three - its ok. If your not, you should think twice about sending real name onto web site that anyone can hack and that can easily become public.

MarineCorps1606 reads

Posted By: MarineCorps
thinking about using one, but I don't know how much info they want and would retain. You guys remember what happened in that DC Madam Case a few years ago, right?
You can't get in any trouble though, since they cannot verify that it was you or someone else using your name. Plus, you could have just scheduled something but nothing ever happened. However, you could start being in one's radar...

palmtree2679 reads

So curious to hear reaction to this plan, with loopholes anyone can think of:  Get verified with a third-party service like P411 or DateCheck, then use an agency that belongs to that service. So the agency only knows your service ID, not your personal information.

What are the flaws in the thinking here?   One being whether you trust the third party service - but they presumably can't track your activity once you've made contact with an agency, right?

Posted By: palmtree2
So curious to hear reaction to this plan, with loopholes anyone can think of:  Get verified with a third-party service like P411 or DateCheck, then use an agency that belongs to that service. So the agency only knows your service ID, not your personal information.

What are the flaws in the thinking here?   One being whether you trust the third party service - but they presumably can't track your activity once you've made contact with an agency, right?
Depends on how they work.  If the verification service knows that Agency (or Provider) X called for verification of Client Z at such-and-such date and time, they might keep a record of that.  If Agency X can provide enough justification, then the verification service might give you up -- if you beat up the girl, for example.  That won't help them so much if you only used the verifier the first time, and were then regarded as "trusted client", but it's still a place to start.

Be clear about what you're worried about, and about the risks you might be running.  You also want to recognize the risks that the girls are running as well.  It is not enough to think, "Well, they can't make a charge stick", because you might have other things at risk.  What if LE runs your plates when they see your car parked outside a suspicious location, and sends a letter to your wife to advise her that the car was spotted?  What if they call your employer and ask if your whereabouts can be verified for a specific time (which might be when you were at a "client meeting")?

You want to avoid coming to their attention at all if there is anything that you have to lose.  You could probably sue if LE tried some of the tactics listed above, but that won't get you un-fired or un-divorced.  Even if you did sue, you'll wind up in front of a judge who isn't stupid, and will be looking at whatever proof LE can bring to bear.  He'll want to rule against you if it's obvious that you're just trying to beat the rap, and he might find a way unless you and your lawyer are slick AND lucky.

In general, if you have a lot to lose, have a low tolerance for risk.  You can't have a ZERO tolerance and still be involved with the hobby, but you can be extremely careful.  Things still might blow up on you (see "Eliot Spitzer" for an example), but you can decrease the probability.

Register Now!