Washington DC

Re: Molly Montana
FoxFire66 15 Reviews 3918 reads
posted
1 / 23

A few days ago I received an email from JM saying two models are not available now.  I honestly thought it was a typo because the emails usually say "so-and-so is available now."  I've since gone to the website and it's still up but there's nothing on it.  I also can't find them on Twitter anymore.  Anyone have any news? I might call/text them but figured I'd start here.
Thanks! FF66

holystonethedeck 78 Reviews 76 reads
posted
2 / 23

No idea. I'm on their email list but usually only get one or two emails a week if that. Haven't gotten one in a few days at least.

1980STT 43 Reviews 71 reads
posted
3 / 23

They don't always have girls in town.  That's normal.  I've seen that several times this year.  Also, as we move into fall I always notice less ladies due to travel, holidays, etc.

cageyboy 25 Reviews 71 reads
posted
4 / 23

Jennifer's Models is not worth a rat's ass!!!

fkkuberalles 108 Reviews 89 reads
posted
5 / 23

I have to be honest and confess that I met some truly remarkable lady through JM in my life, but as an agency it's so unreliable. I was let down multiple times.

frank5678 15 Reviews 78 reads
posted
6 / 23

LOL JM is trash. I used them years ago and they were trash back then. Pictures are fake and whoever is the comms person on their end has a terrible attitude.

b18c195 19 Reviews 64 reads
posted
7 / 23

100 percent agreed with this.

essex7477 4 Reviews 67 reads
posted
8 / 23

Don't waste your time because JM is the WORST agency in the DC area.  The majority of the time the girls' pictures are photo shopped/enhanced or fake.  More importantly, the girls rarely provide full GFE.  This has happened to me on several occasions.  I have a feeling the owner either doesn't instruct/tell the girls that they need to provide GFE or he just leaves it up to them on what type of service they want to provide.  Many times the girls are just plain inexperienced.   Bottom line, JM sucks and it has gotten away with type of stuff for way too long.  Don't waste your hard earned money on them.

LikeTearsInRain 85 reads
posted
9 / 23

Might as well post this here about JM that I posted on another thread about them.

One particular problem I'll mention.  
They named or allowed one of their women to advertise as "Penelope West" who is not the actual Penelope West that has been working in DC/NOVA for years. I know the real Penelope and she knows JM knows who she is. It's theft plain and simple. Penelope gets emails now saying "did you leave the agency" and shit like that. Anyway book the real Penelope. Even better book her with her friend Mikaela. 😃
For the record I've never had a problem with Jen but I thought this thing they did was shitty

discretionist 70 reads
posted
10 / 23

Is she still sending out emails? I just noticed she has a new lady listed on her website, but I never got an email (I've been on her mail list for a long time). And I don't recall an email from her in over a month or so.

holystonethedeck 78 Reviews 61 reads
posted
11 / 23

I got an email from JM on 10/19 for Rebecca Karter. The last one before that was back on 9/25.

discretionist 69 reads
posted
12 / 23

Interesting. I never got any email on 10/19 about Rebecca Karter. (or any email on 9/25). But I got an email today Molly Montana and Kitana Turner. First email from JM since 9/19. (And yes, I checked my spam). Quite odd.

colguy1981 77 reads
posted
13 / 23

I have seen several girls from JM. Two of my ATFs have been from JM (Melanie Dupont and Avery Taylor). Others I have seen don't look anywhere close to their pics.

So today I looked at her website and recognized Molly from someone I follow on IG. She has over 1M followers. While I won't completely rule out it's not her, i highly doubt it. I reached out to JM to let her know that maybe someone had sent her fake pics. Hope she was receptive and does something to ensure that pics are real. There are plenty of ways to ensure girls send their real pics.

If for some reason it is the person I follow on IG, I would probably book an hour for every day she is in town! Haha

If someone does see her, would be great for them to let us know if they do think it's her.

GentDiors 30 Reviews 77 reads
posted
14 / 23

If you ended up TOFTT, please let us know how it turned out.  I'm 95% sure it was a fake pix and have been kinda burnt twice by the discrepancy of the pix and in person (first a similar fake photo of an IG model, another time same person but over touched up pix by a lot). Thanks

zellfreddy 17 Reviews 63 reads
posted
15 / 23

There's a review just posted: he says she looks nothing like the pictures on the website. He didn't say anything in the non vip section about her appearance other than that.

I've noticed JM girls using pics from south american IG influencers in the past. I reverse image search everything lol. Like 5 years ago one of the JM girls was using a pic from Jen Selter's IG lol.

juicyjuice90210 22 Reviews 81 reads
posted
16 / 23
1980STT 43 Reviews 65 reads
posted
17 / 23

Melanie Dupont is in my top three.  I'd see her daily if she returned.  But, it's been a long time and I don't think she's returning.  Agree, a lot of fake IG photos.  I wanted to see Molly, but those photos look way too fake.  Easily from an IG account.  Plus, a girl like her wouldn't go for $400/hour.

Helpmehelpyou22 70 reads
posted
18 / 23

Bummer to hear and more so that the agency hasn’t pulled the fake provider after 3 pretty negative reviews. Shit in this hobby keeps sliding downhill.

1980STT 43 Reviews 77 reads
posted
19 / 23

I've been using JM for years and years.  Yes, back in the day the ladies were amazing.  Photos were not fake.  But, keep in mind the photos are not supplied by JM.  They are supplied by the ladies.  It's not like JM actually meets them in person.  So, it is bad when so many ladies recently use fake photos.  Even just 2-3 years ago most of the photos were real and some of the ladies were freaking amazing like Melanie Dupont, Ashley Taylor, etc.  But, those days seem to be gone.  I'm very very cautious to book with a JM lady who's photos look too good because they normally are.  Also, you can sort of tell by now what an IG photo looks like.  It's a shame because I'd love to see some of the ladies from 2-4 years go.  They were great.

MaxSky 240 Reviews 70 reads
posted
20 / 23

I just noticed that JM has 4 new ladies listed for this week. (I didnt find reviews for any of them)
After the two models last week were outed as fake... or at least not as advertised, I hope these 4 are better.
I'm only willing to give JM another try because of some of the outstanding JM ladies I have seen in the past.
I am scheduled to see Sarah tomorrow afternoon so I will post feedback as soon as I can.
Wish me luck

MaxSky 240 Reviews 83 reads
posted
21 / 23

I saw Sarah today. Latina. I can say the photos are real and recent.  Performance was good.
So I gave JM another chance and they didn't disappoint. I hope it is a trend.
I submitted a full review but that will take a few days.

PorkPies 92 reads
posted
22 / 23

No excuse for not screening their models before allowing them to join the agency. It's as easy as having the model submit a selfie picture holding up a current newspaper/magazine and or/holding a specific pose. They probably screen us clients way harder than their girls...which is killing their agencies rep, so it is their own fault.

cageyboy 25 Reviews 55 reads
posted
23 / 23

JM was shit out of the starting gate many years ago.

Register Now!