There is a Mya with straight brown hair, 26 years old, green eyes and 5'1" on Eros at
the first link below:
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/131623.htm
and her email is [email protected]
Using the phone number, it links to a TER review of a 36-40 year old blonde called SWEET BUNNY (Not sweetbunnyluv!)
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=130291
and the reviewer says that her pictures are old. Her website listed on TER is below:
http://dc-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/347081.htm
and this looks very much like Mya, but goes by the name of Ivory and her email is [email protected].
The reviewer said the rate is $200, while the cityvibe is $250 and there is no rate posted on Eros. I sure would like to open the door to a Mya or Ivory than a Sweet Bunny (again, Not sweetbunnyluv!)  I guess....but I'm not encouraged by the inconsistencies.



-- Modified on 1/1/2010 2:44:01 PM

I think you are right to be suspicious.

FWIW, I know I've seen Mya's pics on Cityvibe before, but can't seem to track anything down.

As the Sugar Bowl is not really holding my attention, I find myself going through Rip-Off reviews.  Honestly, I'm looking for profiles with dead ads so that I can report them, or find active ads for the same girl, and earn myself a few more days of VIP.

ANYWAY, the phone number for this rip-off profile for Barbie...

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=137885#

...matches up with several ads using those pics of Mya.

http://clerotic.org/22/posts/1_Escorts__Adult_Services__Erotic_Services/1_w4m/967135_BARBIE_LOOKING_FOR_KEN.html

http://eroticservices.cityvibe.com/index.php?do=view&p=1545834

http://www.escortguide.com/escort/Barbie5

http://eroticservices.cityvibe.com/index.php?do=view&p=1561327

http://baltimore.craigslist.org/ads/1533399740.html

http://baltimore.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/_knock_out_brunette_26/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1608338

http://femalemacs.com/a,1085,__%E2%9D%A4-*||FLAWLESS||*__*||BRUNETTE||*__*||BARBIE||*-%E2%9D%A4.htm

You get the idea!

It also seems that the "brick house" description of herself is common to the Eros ad for Mya and the first Craig's list ad for Barbie...Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive...

Oh my goodness!  Following that craziness gave me a headache.

Darling, it's a scary world out there.  I just think it's incredible that the reviewer thought he was ordering Mya and when a mid-30s to early-40s blonde showed up he still went for it and just called the photos old.

the recurring pic in a lot of the ads you tagged, girl in pink shirt with pink panties around her thighs, is a stolen internet porn model pic.

pic in ad for Barbie5 is Raven Riley, internet porn model.

A lot of their content is data farming. It's content they took from people who weren't actually advertising, just to make it look like they're successful.

Old retired ladies show up on that site all the time. The ad running her rate may be showing an old one.

They have an agreement with TER where they will create an ad for free linking to reviews, good or bad.

Since CV creates it, they will be there long after a provider retires, or changes name. This keeps the profile active with a link to the CV ad forever.

There has been no means to remove them given by CV or TER that I am aware of.

The only good thing is CV will create an ad even if the link to the review is to a Rip-off scammer with bad reviews. Keeping those around forever would be nice as it will have photo's to compare when someone comes back with a new name.