Washington DC

Re: I think what happens is this...
TrulyMsMocha See my TER Reviews 638 reads
posted

Overwhelmingly fairly true but there are plenty who give fake reviews or the guy felt slighted about something ...there's one or 2 I could disupute but that's something else.

I don't think that people like to write bad reviews, unless the conduct is egregious.  So if they had a so-so time, they typically just won't write a review at all.

It's not that guys are giving the women they see inflated scores, or just giving them all 8s and 9s, it's that they just don't submit reviews for providers they see that would score under a certain threshold.

I have a good friend who used to review hip-hop albums for a hip-hop magazine....and I asked him why he always gave such stellar reviews to albums and his answer was a simple one.  "I only review shit that I like...I listen to a lot more than just the ones I write reviews for..."

So if a reviewer has 30+ reviews...all in the 8s or 9s...he's likely had a fair number of 7s and maybe even a few 6s...that he just hasn't written about...

It's not some sinister collusion to "defraud" hobbyists or steer them wrong...it just is what it is...

Finally a calm voice of reason on this topic - THANK YOU

exactly true in my case, though I am nowhere near 30 reviews.

I think there are cases where a guy doesn't want to hurt someone's feeling by reviewing a girl he thinks is really a 6. So her gives her a 7 or 8 instead.

Also, numbers can be inflated because a reviewer doesn't want to get any backlash from giving a less than stellar review. If you rate an indy low, she may never see you again, but you probably wouldn't have booked with her anyway, no loss. But if you rate an agency girl low, you might get banned from the entire agency.  This would suck if you generally like the rest of the roster.

You got blacklisted by an agency for writing a bad review?

I know if I have a mediocre experience with a agency I like, I'm not likely to write a review on that girl.

Don't discount pride. No one wants to look like they have mediocre tastes.

I post them all, the good, the bad and the ugly:)

Also, most of us tend to play it safe by only seeing well reviewed providers - and I certainly don't look for low-mid range ratings when deciding - hence the higher rated providers tend to be seen more often and hence get more reviews.  If you are clean, well mannered, and treat the lady well, if you went in expecting an certain level of performance, you'll likely get it, hence you too will give her a good review.  My low score reviews have largely been when I took a chance on someone with no or few reviews, something don't do as I have become more experienced and able to provide the verification that most high rated providers expect.

My situation only.  I usually schedule a week or so in advance.  I do my homework, read carefully, and try to be very selective.  By the time the date occurs I've put a lot of effort into ensuring I am going to enjoy the evening and I am going to be happy with how she looks.  I have found some guys who review providers the way I do (I compaired their reviews of ladies I've seen with my own thoughts on her), I exchange a few e-mails or calls with her to judge compatability, I ask some of the women I've seen who else is similar to them in attitude and style.  Occasionally I've been disapointed but very rarely.  Usually when I've relied upon someone else's recommendation rather than doing my own homework (some other guy, I've not yet been steered bad by a provider).

Most the women I've been with (not just those I've reviewed here) have been 7+ in looks and 9+ in performance.  I know that's not the standard population of providers but the time spend screening on my end has helped me find a disproportionate number of the good ones based upon what's important to me.

Overwhelmingly fairly true but there are plenty who give fake reviews or the guy felt slighted about something ...there's one or 2 I could disupute but that's something else.

I personally agree with much of this train of thought.  In general, I try to always be positive when writing reviews, always try to point out those aspects of an escort that I found good, enjoyable, different. I also realize that everyone (clients) has different tastes, and therefore try not to write a negative review about characteristics of an escort that don't match my specific tastes, but likely would match others. I do try to be 100% factual about details that I found to be very positive or very negative, because when I am considering a date with a new provider, that is exactly what I seek to find within their reviews, positive characteristics that align very well with my particular tastes.

So, the bottom line is that I always write reviews when my experience was stellar, and I always write reviews when I felt the provider really fell far short (typically "attitude" characteristics versus "purely physical looks or performance"). When I choose not to write a review (which is a small percentage of time), it is usually because I had only a so-so experience, but rather than blaming it purely on the provider, attributed it also to my lack of investigation ahead of time to determine that the provider's style fit well with mine.

Register Now!