She was completely legit, so the implication would be she requested delisting. I'm not sure just what the TER policy is but generally I cannot think of any time TER delisted a provider for cause without been both discussion on the boards and reports (generally via reviews) made to them. Given that you say you already saw her and was trying to submit a positive review the implication it was her choice seems most likely.
WHY she might have requested it is not something you or I have real have any grounds knowing so probably best to just move on.
Something weird happened. I wrote a review about a provider that was a ton of fun (and her popularity vouched for it). My review was unapproved because provider was delisted. I know for a fact that she's legit.
She was completely legit, so the implication would be she requested delisting. I'm not sure just what the TER policy is but generally I cannot think of any time TER delisted a provider for cause without been both discussion on the boards and reports (generally via reviews) made to them. Given that you say you already saw her and was trying to submit a positive review the implication it was her choice seems most likely.
WHY she might have requested it is not something you or I have real have any grounds knowing so probably best to just move on.
Nope. I don't really care about having her profile up. What I care about is understanding why she was delisted, as, sure as hell, she looked 100% legit to me. I asked support. They replied with "no comment".
What could Molly possibly have done to deserve delisting?
You won't know why unless you ask her, so it's best to let it go. Although I agree with you that it likely wasn't because of the nature of her reviews, I think it still is likely that either she or the agency requested the delisting in light of what happened at the other agency. I know that the agency will be keeping a low profile for the next few weeks.
Something weird happened. I wrote a review about a provider that was a ton of fun (and her popularity vouched for it). My review was unapproved because provider was delisted. I know for a fact that she's legit.
I am talking about M***y from AG in Tysons.
Does anyone happen to know what the deal is?
I think this has to do with the shutdown at the other agency, and people becoming more cautious.
Also possible that the provider is trying to rebrand from being a Las Vegas BB princess. We may see her listed in the future under another name.
A lot of girls in Vegas offer BB as an upsell. Many of them don't offer it when they tour in other locations. She has a TER profile from Vegas, so it should be easy to find. Offering this service is not a reason for delisting by the site and I think it's pretty clear at this point that either the girl or the agency requested the delisting, not TER.
I've seen a few women who had stellar reviews who requested to be delisted. Many dislike the "review culture" and others have their own reasons. Why don't you ask her the next time you see her - no one here knows why she was delisted.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
