Both different sets of photos have been used interchangeably on ads for "Dani V" and "Naomi." Naomi lists a different phone number and the email: [email protected] . Now, some girls legit do use different sets of photos (which may be authentic representations of themselves) and different numbers in different ads. This just seems odd. Maybe that isn't a complete red flag, but a yellow flag? Or maybe it is a red flag. I certainly haven't met this provider yet. Whoever they are...the person in the photos or not.
These photos/similar ones have been posted under this name on various ad sites in the DC section...and if legit, would be very interesting. "Dani V" has had a couple different numbers...just over the past year. (Sometimes there is an actual good reason for personal privacy or safety, but in some cases...it may be for a different reason.) I reached out to this provider once, and they weren't very responsive. Always been curious...but perhaps I have avoided a trap thus far? Is this person a catfish?
This person has the same pics. It is more likely that this ad would be authentic than the adultsearch post in my opinion...but I have no idea if either ad is legit, or actually was posted by the girl in its pics. That is why I ask here. Anybody have any comments or info to share? Different names, numbers...same pics/body on different sites. They could all be the same girl and it might be real, they might all be a scam. Maybe one is real and the other ads aren’t. I keep wondering.
The girl looks similar in the two ads, but the photos are different, right? The ads don't raise any obvious red flags for me. Maybe worth emailing one or both and finding out about rates and screening?
Both different sets of photos have been used interchangeably on ads for "Dani V" and "Naomi." Naomi lists a different phone number and the email: [email protected] . Now, some girls legit do use different sets of photos (which may be authentic representations of themselves) and different numbers in different ads. This just seems odd. Maybe that isn't a complete red flag, but a yellow flag? Or maybe it is a red flag. I certainly haven't met this provider yet. Whoever they are...the person in the photos or not.
If she is a "she." It could be some 70 year old guy posting the ad to scam men...who knows what is waiting for them or who is really messaging them when they reach out to some text only phone number posted on an internet ad. That is a risk many here have taken when they TOFTT by entering a hotel room in hopes of meeting the girl in the pictures when meeting a provider for the first time. A safe and satisfying experience involving zero deception may await them, or danger (in so many forms) might await them. That is why this website is so essential. It must exist to promote awareness, provide important information, and serve as a medium of exchange between providers and their customers. TER is a very good thing.
That said, Johns need to do their own "screening" (as was getting done) just like the providers. I think they should also, and I think not doing so is something of a rookie type mistake, follow the same approach as experienced providers and agencies. If something seems off don't waste a lot of time trying to prove it is a good thing. That is your little head talking.
TER is good and nice to have it back and can be helpful on a lot of counts. Again though it seems a lot of people don't get full value (but if you stay safe maybe the rest doesn't matter) because they really don't use reviews that well -- all the "what's the number crowd".
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
