I commented about this on a thread a couple weeks ago, but I've continued to have this issue.  Wondering if I'm just missing something or violating some rule I'm not aware of.

In May I got back into the hobby after getting vaccinated and I visited a few of the girls at BG.  (Anna, Maria, and Courtney.)  Anna and Maria already had reviews, and I wrote new reviews of my own that were accepted.

When I tried to write a new review of Courtney (Who didn't already have any) it got rejected for the reason "The website that was included in your review has expired."  I double checked the website and opened a support request.  They informed me that they were unable to get to the site.  I triple checked and also recommended maybe they try the HTTP version of the site instead of HTTPS.  Same answer.  Could never get that review posted.

Then I tried to write a second review of Anna.  I'd written an accepted review of her around six weeks prior.  Her profile still listed the same personal website as always.  I submitted my review only to get rejected for the same reason as the other girl.  "The website that was included in your review has expired."  Then I noticed they also took the personal website off the Anna's listing, despite the fact that it's still valid and reachable.

Am I missing something here?  Are there just some sites we're not supposed to review, and BG recently got added to that list?  If so, how to I know in advance?  Am I just posting too many reviews?  Or too many reviews of PV places? I've noticed everyone talks around these agencies without giving out direct URLs, and I'm not sure why we do that either.  What are the rules?

(If you want to see the site and girls I'm referring to and you're not already familiar, just google "Gems Massage Virginia".)

Any help cluing me in here would be appreciated.

I don't know the answer.  But since no one seems to be able to officially review her, how was Courtney?    

https://www.bluegems.com/the-ladies/courtney/  (and yes I left the s in https so it would not be clickable).

I don't see any issue with that HOWEVER, I do notice that each of the pages includes the statement about being logged in to leave a comment. I suspect that most of the comments might meet the status of being reviews so it would not be allowed per the TER rules.

My VIP is about to expire, so I'd better comment while I still can.

I've seen her three times now. She's great. No BJ or FS, but she's eager to please. Great kisser.  She's very young. 18-21, somewhere in there. Cute as fuck and nervous in an adorable way. Maybe a little clumsy in her execution, but it kinda makes it sexier to me.

NO BJ or FS so what do you do hold hands?

...Maybe gaze at the sky if it's a clear night.. LMAO...

He has to have made an error. Probable meant "no bbbj or bbfs."

It's a PV (Private Viewing) place.  Think body rub+.  YMMV, but typically it's just mutual touching and a hand release.  Maybe LFK/DFK and a BJ if you're lucky.