This is an opening for me to raise the point I started to several days ago when someone inquired about the notorious "Linda." Currently, the "rip-offs" section of the Review Board is pretty weak. Five at most, last time I checked. Yet, we all know there are dozens, if not hundreds, if not thousands -- both well-known B&S agencies and indies. I asked the TER powers if there was a problem with the definition of "rip off" that was preventing entries and they said no, folks just aren't contributing. I know that one can often find bad reviews by name in the regular review section or get useful info. on rip-offs by searching through threads in the discussion board. It's also my guess that good rip-off artists keep moving, changing names, numbers, etc., and, therefore, trying to find a current website so the rip-off review will actually get posted is difficult. But it seems to me we ought to make the "rip-off" board more useful by establishing a more comprehensive list of both agencies and individuals known for not providing what they advertise. That way, Jeopcon1 won't have to yell, "Bait and switch!" every time a newbie posts a 411 request. I'm commiting to entering a few, even though it's been quite awhile because I've been taught how to spot them by expeienced members of this board and now have a list of regular indies and agencies I go to exclusively. Thoughts from others?