and shilling up the DMV girls all over  AGAIN! I am not buying it since every DMV chick you have raved about has turned out to be dissapointing. Why am I not surprised that you gave her a 9 for performance? I will commend you here because if you actually gave her a 7 for looks then she must be in reality a 5. Sorry, about the alias

Felix

Had an energetic session with Daisy today. Nice, intelligent young lady who "enjoys sex" (her exact words).  Her actions spoke louder than her words, she loves sex!

Location: Tyson's/Falls Church, incall
Donation:  $$$
Pics:  accurate, tattoos removed for security reasons.
Piercings/Tattoos:  1, pierced navel/~6 tats; each ankle (small), upper back (small), lower back (medium), front hip (small), right shoulder (small). Pretty unobtrusive
Services:  DFK, LFK, DATY, DATO, DIGITS-IV, LIGHT ANAL PLAY (No Greek), BBBJDT, BLS, HJ, MSOG, MPCFS, COB (No CIM or COF), SPANKING, DIRTY TALK
Looks:  Long legs, nice nipples. Decent face, ok body. Looked sexy in her black nightie and thong.  About a 7.
Performance:  9, Daisy loves sex, only limitation was no greek, no CIM or COF.  Definite GFE.
Recommend:  Yes, she is high energy and somewhat tireless.  Sweet young lady.

Enjoy the season!  Cheers!

It has long been clear that Ken302 is a plant that writes fake reviews for DMV

Who the hell remembers the amount of tats on a woman. And in great detail. Do we need
to know this, I think not.

How much did they pay you?

Some of you guys are acting like girls.
Just because he frequents a couple of agencies does not make him a shill. Multiple mini reviews for the same agency/s does not put him in a bad light in my opinion. I would think that some of you would be thanking him.

As far as I am concerned, he is a very credible reviewer, is honest and does not inflate his scores. Can everyone else here say the same.

Get a grip!

Why don't you silence them with your justifications. Apparently you've build a reputation for yourself as writing shill reviews. Whats your logic or reasons. Justify yourself from the other comments if you want to make yourself credible. Otherwise, other hobbyist will continually label you as an imposter.

I am still new to the scene, so I do not know what the situation is. The only thing I can conclude is that other hobbyist has questioned your minis and reviews for obvious reasons. If you don't defend yourself, give some sort of justifications, or give a reason. Then, well, I would have to assume what others have said about you to be correct. Better man up brother and give us some reasons to believe your reviews.

If not, it's their own fault

What a stupid non-point

and so what if he posts multiple minis for an agency. Everyone benefits. In addition, if you look at his reviews he is not handing out 10's like candy. Shills generally stick with 9's and 10's.

I really have to wonder what  other's agendas are. It would seem that a few have a gripe against the agency and Ken is being subjected to the wrath as opposed to the agency itself. It is known that a few guys are banned from one or more of the agencies, so Ken makes an easy target.

I hope you are a little more enlightened today unless you are banned from the agency and it doesn't matter.

There's a reason I and a whole bunch of others skip over all his reviews.

Fortunately, I usually don't see vast majority of the girls that he sees.