This is okay with people? Agencies requiring clients' full names and other bits of identifying personal information?

Considering the investigative capabilities of LE and the "gray" (to say the least) area that this conduct occurs in, the possibility for agencies to mishandle this information, and even the possibility for malevolent actors in agencies to abuse this information, I'm in disbelief that people accept this as a reasonable upfront cost.

Also, there are so many other agencies in the area that don't require their clients to disclose their full names! Who in their right mind is okay with giving an agency, a provider, or anyone in this realm, that kind of information?

Man . . . i was thinking the same thing raybup!  Am so glad you raised the issue.  No way dude!
You'd be crazy to give up your personal info unless you wanna end up in the pokey or risk getting exposed.   Even if you're willing to risk, how likely is your info to end up in the wrong hands - almost guaranteed.

Funny you mention Wet-n-Wild (www.wetnwildescorts.com).  Just today they demaded the same thing and threw a fit when I dared question their reasoning.  The new repackaged service TDC (tdc.companionfiles.com) also demanded my proof of identity.  Refused to accept whitelistings, my provider refs and other suggested offers to verify.  
After that, I had to tell them both no thank you.  

Excuse they gave was concern that I wasn't a rapist, murderer or other type of prospective provider abuser.  
My suggestions to use a third party verifier went unanswered.  wetnwild demanded just give us the info.
While TDC said nothing less than my verifying my full name, address, DOB would be acceptable for verification.

I've got sneaky suspicion that LE sting may be behind this or some sort of organized crime scam.
Some of us can't afford to be publicly exposed and need to stay ultra discreet - for various reasons.  
As for me, it'd be a major headache but I'd need to uproot myself and relocate elsewhere.  Still though, who wants that inconvenience.

Maybe I shouldve said I'll gladly show me mine if you show me yours ehy?

Correction I can admit my wrongs.  WetnWild actually got back to me and indicated acceptance of P411 or rs2k.
FYI suggest P411 or RS2K as an alternative to revealing your sensitive info . . .  

If that's still not accepted - red flagit

Hey guys! Just wanted to clear some air.  

We accept multiple ways to verify.  P411 RS2K and TER whitelisted, and some Agency/provider reference.  If your not a memeber of any of those sites then we do resort to our own verification process that yes does include giving us personal information.    

But trust me when I say I get it! I wouldn’t want my real info with some Agency I don’t know.   A lot of clients give it with no problems. Verification is a one time process.  And no we don’t save it.  Once verified we simply mark as.. verified.. who you saw.. and how much was paid..  
but I do get the concern.  But with so many verification sites out there, you really have options on how you go about providing verification.   And really Were just trying to keep our girls safe and keep you guys happy!  

Hope this clears the air... as I look forward to working with you guys!  

Stay warm!

FYI, my ter whitelists were refused friend.  And the caveat to P411 is that your booker wouldn't accept anything less than 5 weeks established.  So I dunno if it's a different person speaking now versus who books but there's some inconsistency with my experience of establishing with wetnwild.

It was a fluke.  

Yes we’re a team.  Mistakes happen but we’re both on the same page with you now lol  

Don’t worry! All this hassle will be done and be so worth it!

Good for you!

Dear "Geo" darling,

Your comment is quite exaggerated when you mention our verification method was too intrusive, I explained my reasoning, and you refused and I politely said no thanks and not the other way around and it ended peacefully, no reason to act like a victim and start a rant.  Shall I send you our conversation via private mail to refresh your memory?  As stated on my site, if I don' feel comfortable with your application I will ask additional questions my dear and in the end if we are not compatible then so be it.  No reason to make exaggerated comments that deviate from our actual exchange, but something in your approach did not sit well with me, quite simple and by all means dont take it personal.  

Oh and plenty of reviews of my girlfiends are there to confirm our establishment.  No reason to spit out silly conspiracy theories.  Simple babe.  

And big hugs to all my lovely handsome men out there who support my girlfriends and I

Xoxo
Tara

Exagerated? lol . . . babe i reviewed our thread . . .  i gave you my ter handle, whitelists and 3 references.  But you insisted on my identity.  There are no victims here only business decisions . . . and I made mine just as politely not to patronize on the insistence to reveal my personal identity.

no worries . . . there are plenty of other choices for both of us.    
I understand the need for cover as coming off with a certain demeanor can impact business.  

And I did correct myself on any mistaken notions prior to your response (see below).  Hobbying bro raydbup raised a recent unusual practice observation that deviated from alt. verification.  And that piqued a common interest.  
Thanks and take care.

"Geo" babe thank you for the response.   Indeed we have options.  Lots of love.

I reached out to them via P411 and was not given any hassles, my schedule has been crazy so I haven't been able to see any of their ladies yet, but I look forward to doing so soon. Just figured I'd throw my 2cents in to my experience with them.