We saw the issues come to light immediately after his threads.  
 
 
   
 
We have guys complaining about reviews getting them banned from Jennifer's Models. Granted, he was about full expression...but reviews get manipulated by providers and/or agencies. guys should feel comfortable writting reviews, period.  
 
Plus, we saw digdirkler go on his racism justification tirade. Seriously, do we see agencies at the same price point being overly concerned about black men being clients? What's up with the Indys?  
 
Also, we saw some independent providers treat the hobby like a dating website. Some of the k-girls (all be it agency) barely speak English, but they damn sure know how to pamper everyone and they are at a connection disadvantage. If a guy wants a dinner date, or a longer date then by all means put him to the test. But I do feel the 1hr guys are unnessarily on Love Connection at times.

.......just let it go. It's not a perfect world. It never will be. Find what works for you and move on.on.

the posts are equally difficult to follow.

And perhaps another: "all be it" instead of "albeit."

Grammatical ticks are far more telling than most people really know.  (I'm in full agreement with you.)

I have not comment J-models review retaliation strategy

For what it's worth - I like your opinions you've shared the last couple days.  I don't post much here but your spot on with your thoughts imo.  Who the hell is anyone here to call someone out or say that the girl is racist because she doesn't want to be intimate with a black man.  That's her personal preference.  So what?

have the standard 'We reserve the right to refuse service to...' sign. Why should providers not have the same right?  I've been to classy restaurants that required gents to wear a jacket (most have a small supply of cheap navy blazers they will loan you so as not to lose your business).  Most of us would agree that a provider has the right to refuse service to a drunk or someone obviously high on drugs, so why can't they have other standards?

A lunch counter is not the same as a woman's body.  Let's not lose perspective here.

I'm sure the reason why the agencies don't have race/age/eye color/whatever restrictions is because the ones setting the parameters aren't the ones participating in the actual appointments. When you're working for someone else, you don't really have that luxury.

gonna guess because there are 3-4 million whites and asians, and the DC suburban counties other than PG are top wealthiest in the country, so there are plenty of viable customers if a woman chooses to screen AA

So, fear of being "racist!!!" must trump all rational self interest for whites (and Asians, and Latinos) huh?    
As long as blacks behave radically differently, on average, than other groups, yes, people will in fact pursue their self interest.   You don't let the law thwart your desire to pay for sex, nor do you want even a woman's preferences to get in  your way (dating service!), but you think everyone must sacrifice their self interest for others, for you, when it comes to race.

I have seen some higher end girls give weight limits on their websites.  But point taken, AA screening is most common.

And I've dealt with my fair share of crybabies over that as well. Most reasonable dudes will just say "oh well, on to the next!" Only the ones with fragile egos will give even half of a fuck.

Glad to see you didn't get your lady boner caught in the zipper over my joke.

....his racists views!!  Period!!  Dig's expression of his amateur statistical analysis is nothing but a shell game for him to express his racist views.