about the authenticity of her photos. Her photos doesn't yield much results but the last (third photo) photo did. Usually I try to make a physical comparison between the Eros ad and the resources that was produced be research on Google image. However, the physical comparison are similar such as breast size, waist, and hips. The only significant variation I see is the age. The other sources state that the girl in question is 19, 20, or early 20's and not mid to late 20's such as 26 as listed in the Eros ad.

That is all I can do. I can say that someone (either the girl in the Eros ad or other agencies listed in the sources) is lying. Go for a well reviewed girl if you cannot decide. If you like blonde spinners, then I would recommend Chloe or Kate from DC Companions: read their reviews to find out more.

Saw that with Britney recently.

But it is not a question of the source.  It is the fact that those pictures are obviously the product of a very bad cut and paste job.    I ha e not sen mimatches like since the era of BBSes.