Can anyone confirm the accuracy of Ivana's pictures?  I'd like to see her but the pics look TGTBT.

Or better yet, why don't you toftt and report back?

My thing is, if the provider is showing her face, normally, it'll be pretty close.  However, if it's blurred, that's when all things go bust.

I had a recent disappointment because every review said she was 8-9 look wise, but when I went, she was nothing like her PrimeDC photos.  And her face was blurred.  (you can see my review for more info)

Of course, take this as general caution.  Shannon's is blurred, but I thought she looked alot better in person than photos.

I don't like aliases either, but I understand this one.

I saw your review and comments and was suprised your comments/rating differed so much from all the others - are you sure you did not get 2 providers with the same name mixed up?  PrimeDC has a very good reputation and I wouldn't hesitate to TOFTT from one of their new providers.

I've seen her and she is certainly not a "4" in appearance.

There are two versions of Alba. One on their site and one on backpage. Unless she lost 20lbs, it appears the newnpics have been modified.

Ella's pics have clearly been modified. Everyone thought she got implants.

The different opinions about appearance value scores come up repeatedly in different board posts.  In this case, the reviewer may simply be extremely turned off by women he considers fat.  

My starting assumption is always that all pictures are airbrushed/modified.  So I look at all of the scores as an aggregate, I note how reviewers have described the girl, and then I compare it to the pics.  In the end, there's no absolute standard and you just have to go with your gut.

They definitely look airbrushed.

I've got an appointment with her tomorrow...will post a "mini" in the afternoon.

Regards all,