I would PM you, but I since you mentioned it in the boards, I thought it would serve the hobby community to keep us updated.

Attached is the link to the Mini:

Possible response: "You mean the review that was supposed to explain how big her ass / legs are?"

Another possible response: "Not a FAT chance the review would've been accepted with an 8 in appearance"

lol

Unless she has another ad or website his review was likely rejected because the ad was removed.

I don't understand how your mentioning this serves anyone but yourself? Or did you have serious interest in seeing his full review? Or are you policing the TER policy of writing mini's?

The only thing I see from this is how  someone who likes BBW's was made fun of.

So please tell me what your point of posting was, I think that might serve the hobby community even more. But then there is a thing most take issue of about using an alias, personally, I don't care.

I saw the mini, and I liked it. Your right about the ad being deleted, and that could be an issue for not approving the review. Yet, her original ad stated that she will be there for 7 days, meaning her ad will be up for 7 days. He post the mini up with adequate time for it to be reviewed. I also tried to research her, & nothing came up. That made me question the credibility of his statement.

I mentioned this because I want to see the review to help better my understanding of the provider before I saw her. I can't just take advices and recommendations only here from the boards, anybody can write a mini. A review however is more detailed and exact. As far as it benefiting the hobby community, it does. If you make a claim, make sure to back up the claim to show your credibility.

Every1 has their preference, IMO, she wasn't a BBW, but a thick girl from looking at the pics. Its their insecurity that the original post was taken advantage of by immature people poking fun. I myself do not like thin girls.

Hope that make sense.