I have wanted to meet this lady for ages.  Her choice of the Hotel Rouge for her pics caught my eye.  That style and look spoke of an attitude I find fascinating.   And she did not disappoint.  She showed up beautifully attired (and hot) for an extended engagement and was great eye candy for turning heads in the Inner Harbor area.  She really is a delicate beauty:  from immaculate nails to perfect hair (finally, a hottie without extensions, lol), beautiful eyes, perfect complexion, etc.  Very little makeup, no lipstick, etc, just a small (and I repeat small) amount of an "Egyptian look" eyeliner, which I found totally hot for her facial structure.  She obviously is workin hard on herself and her look - and has evolved it into a sophisticated model look with a touch of high class stripper thrown in.  Very effective on me

Don't call her if you want a BBBJ or DFK, that's not going to happen.  But she is very cooperative and skilled within her boundaries and I had a great time.  She appears fully recovered from her pregnancy, with almost no telltale signs aside from what I appreciated as a comfortable and not too tight fit.  Best for me was the doggie and dirty talking and her effort to have good sex for herself too.

This girl, even though young (I'd say 25) is a savvy pro - nobody is gonna rip HER off or mistreat HER.  At first meeting her she was all business - with the ID check, standard questions about LE, donation, rules, etc.  I actually appreciated that, and it was good to see some guarded professionalism from a lady for a change.  After she got comfortable though, she got very personable and GFE in attitude if not in acronyms.

I will say that if you want more than a couple of hours, she is not inexpensive.  But just the beauty and the doggie makes her, for me, worth a repeat.

I based my decision to call her solely on all her reviews under "Savanah Star", one of which you wrote.  And I agree that it is possible we have significantly different tastes in women.  

For instance, you described her as "emaciated", whereas the woman I met was no more "emaciated" than your typical Victoria's Secret model.  In fact, it occured to me that it would be fun to go shopping with her at Victoria's Secret - you could pull the outfits right off the mannequins for her.

Of course, it could also be the case that there have been changes in the 21 months since you last saw her.  Such as gaining significant weight during pregnancy and working hard to lose it in the 6 months since.

You of all people, jeopcon, should understand the importance of timeliness of information in the hobby.  Timeliness of information is just as important in the hobby as it is in the stock market.  What may have been a great stock 21 months ago could be a dog today, and what could have been a dog of a stock 21 months ago could be a high flyer today.  So it is with escorts.

But now that I have seen her, I would be interested in reading other reviews.  I always find it interesting to see how situations evolve, and besides, some of the tales seem somehow juicier after you know someone, LOL.

But I can't seem to find the reviews of her you mention under "Savannah" or under "Savanha".  could you please point us to them?

Thanks!
bh

PS - I agree with you about her natural beauty.  This girl really doesn't need ANY makeup.  At the restaurant she asked the waiter to replace her water glass, it had lipstick on it.  I asked "It's not your lipstick?"  "No", she replied, "I'm not wearing any lipstick".  Her lips are so full and moist and pink that I had naturally assumed she was.



Each to his own tastes..........
Posted by jeopcon1  , 11/13/2005 9:05:44 AM   [jeopcon1 has 297 reviews]

I won't say any more than that. Not disputing your experience, Brownhound but I do suggest that any one contemplating seeing her read her reviews thoroughly under both Savannah, Savanha and Savanah Star.

BTW, I'm glad she decided to tone down the make-up. Last time I saw her it really detracted from her natural beauty.

-- Modified on 11/13/2005 9:07:00 AM

-- Modified on 11/13/2005 9:09:16 AM

-- Modified on 11/13/2005 9:10:44 AM