Washington DC

Mini on Courtney from Backpage
rdm410 33 Reviews 1873 reads
posted

Cute, GND blonde from Georgia, advertising on Backpage. Session started promisingly but quickly became mechanical; she was somewhat willing to please but don't expect a GFE.

Location: Tysons Corner
Pics: Body is accurate, face is obscured
GFE: Not really
Services: DATY, BBBJ, MPCFS
Fee: $.5 for 30 mins
Rating: 6/6

Review submitted.  I'm posting this mini because she's leaving town in 6 days. Okay experience for the time/price, if you're looking for the basics with a tiny bit more.

I agree with DB.  And as for her face, we can all see that the photos obscure her face (although, from what little I can see, her face appears to be a 9 as well).   Bottom line is, given the photos, why only a 6?

If so hou could you come to the determination that she was cute?  Dude, pay the $20 and buy yourself a month of membership instead of writing bogus reviews.

What makes you think it's a bogus review. No one does that here. :)

-- Modified on 7/15/2010 11:02:40 PM

Firstly, if I'd rated her a seven looks-wise, would people still be jumping down my throat?  She had a cute enough body which was youthful but not overly tight, the breasts of a younger girl but nothing amazing, and a GND face that is cute enough but she's certainly not a knockout.  To me, the combination was nice enough and so that's how I rated her looks.

The glimpse of face you get in one of the pictures seemed like the face of the person I saw, and the body seemed similar, so I thought it was an accurate if somewhat grainy photo.  When I said "face is obscured", I was clearly commenting on the photo; guess I should've left off the obvious.

I'm thinking that, once again, this is a case of "different strokes for different folks" when it comes to an appearance rating.

Secondly, if it was my intent to post a fake review, why would I have bothered with a mini?  I have a reviewing history, I've got no reason to direct traffic to her, I just wanted to post about a Backpage girl who is leaving town soon, in case others were thinking about seeing her.

I like this community but the negative energy of these reactions is a disappointment that won't stop me from continuing to contribute in the future. In any case, happy hobbying to you all.

you are correct.   you should not have to defend yourself.  some of the comments posted above are just outright dumb!    thank you for the mini.   I appreciate it.   as I saw a bp provider last night and it did not turn out as well as yours.   5/4...... (in Towson, if anyone is interested pm me and ill pass along info, no need to get ostracized by a few uncouth members of the community)       and  btw.  looking at the dates of your most recent review.   it does not look as though you would need to worry about "having to post a review to keep vip"  as the 2 in may and June should insure that you will good for a little while anyways.   so it seems to me that you rev was strictly for the good of the community.   thanks.

If the girl is cute and okay looking.
No chest but good body.

You shouldn't give her a 6 for appearance.

That is what DP was saying.

If it was fake, BTW it does not get him 2 weeks.

Maybe he got a CBJ for the review.  Wow?

If the pic is not accurate, it will become known.

There is a discrepancy in this community as to how the rating system should be read.

Please note that the only unifying standard we have is the Review Faqs guidelines. Unless these are modified/updated I see no way to end such disputes.

Until then one man's 6 will remain another man's 8

True even for what some rate me I'm a 7 to some (had someone try to give me an 8 but it never showed), I'll have visitors say to my face i'm sexy but some can just find me "nice looking".... I've seen chicks get one or 2 5's, and then a lot of 7's and 8's so to be honest when guys rate looks take it with a grain of salt.

yes,  I'm well aware of what a 6 is.  and I also agree with what db said,  his assessment was spot on.  especially with the op's mini.   what I disagree with is other members stating that the op placed the review for free membership!  


"Was her face obscured during FS???
Posted by 808transplant  , 7/15/2010 8:01:11 PM   [808transplant has 21 reviews]

If so hou could you come to the determination that she was cute?  Dude, pay the $20 and buy yourself a month of membership instead of writing bogus reviews."    

I seriously doubt the op placed the review for a free two weeks.  looking at his review history seems to indicate he does not even need.     and why in the world would you write a mini along with a review if you were only looking for a free two weeks?    Really?

Register Now!