Thanks for the info, but please follow the standard format for reviews; for example menu was extensive means ???:

The Message body of the Mini-Review post may only include the following info:

Recommended:  yes/no/ymmv
Rating:  may range from 1/1 to 10/10 (appearance/performance)
GFE:  yes/no/ymmv, or may use the GFE+++ scale
Services:  list acronyms/terms of offered services only
Rates:  rate/time of your encounter
Incall:  yes/no - if yes, list general geographical area
Outcall:  yes/no/unknown
Photos:  accurate/glamour/old/B&S

A link to the provider's current web site or escort mall ad must be included in 'link URL' box.
Providing a photo link in the 'picture URL' box is acceptable.
Additional text is acceptable but it may not have as many details as a formal review.

Mini-Reviews not meeting the format requirements will be removed or modified.

Mini-Reviews must be followed by submission of a full, formal TER review to the TER review database within 72 hours. Violators of this policy will lose their message posting privileges.

You're right!

Arlene was great; I think I prefer Claire more though! I wasn't being critical either. I just helps us all if the minis are done in an orderly manner without leaving alot of questions unanswered. In this case I'd like to know what "extensive menu" translates to?

Cute latina with just my body type, nice b cups and great ass

Looks 8
Performance 9

Provided a great atmosphere with the type of service you expect from seasoned providers although she says this is her first foray into the industry. Willing, accommodating and good anticipation when it comes to knowing what u want.  

DTBBBJ, MSOG, DFK, menu was extensive. Wish I had more time to have fun with her, I had a meeting to run to.

Other details are on the link... Pics r accurate enough, not an issue.  Gotta run,

http://primedc.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=178&Itemid=1

under another name ?

This one came up fast and she's gone just as fast...

Seems to me that the information provided is quite useful and close enough to the "required" format.  But I guess it's better to have no mini than one that doesn't dot every "i" and cross every "t".

I meant no disrespect to you BM.  You provide a valuable service.  But I have to say that I am surprised because by my count, this makes two new cuties at Prime that someone beat you to.  I still can't believe you weren't Johnny on the Spot with Arlene

Thanks, man!

Recommended:  yes
Rating:  8/9
GFE:  yes
Services:  dfk, bbbjdt, msog, mpcfs, fiv, daty
Rates:  $$$/hour
Incall:  yes/DC
Outcall:  available
Photos:  accurate

http://primedc.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=178&Itemid=1

Cute girl, pleasant personality. Just my body type, nice b cups and great ass. Great atmosphere with candles, low lights, soft music, clean towels, hung up jacket, not distracted by phone or tv, dressed the part with nice lingerie. Review submitted.

Ask and you shall receive. Even if submitting by the book only helps BM, I have no prob complying.

Pussy. stick to your own guns and fuck the assholes. I got what I needed from your mini and only a prick would fault you for having a free voice on this open forum. My guess is he's an Obama supportin democrat that feels good and powerful about paying to get laid. Hey, thanks for posting and passing on vital intel cuz there's too much obsessive criticitisim on this board instead of acknowledgement of kudos.....unless you are one of the chosen few prima donnas that the whimpy subs of this board give false witness to.  I give your mini more weight than someone who has an attacking negative affect on readers. Read other boards before you bash me and see if you can find the arrogance that I see here.  All pricks respond at will. ttfn