Washington DC
So, I haven't been hobbying in a while now but occasionally log on to TER. I'm not really the lurking type so I thought I'd share a photo of TWO POPULAR CELEBRITIES and see how we all rate their appearance.
They are obviously not providers, because they are well known celebrities. This is for "appearance ratings" only, not their TV persona or how they looked without makeup or how they look now at an older age, or whatever). Just these photos and nothing else.
Lets see how much we VARY in opinion. My hunch is that the scores will begin to fluctuate to a greater extent when the girl isn't a drop dead gorgeous solid 9 or 10 yet still above average. Maybe this is where 'beauty is in the eyes of the beholder' comes to play to a much greater extent?
FIRST ONE is sarah jessica parker. I'd rater her a 7.5 ~ 8 at most.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ML7mnR8JvY4/Tj3RDnVI0lI/AAAAAAAAA_U/5va9HEMukSE/s1600/Sarah+Jessica+Parker.jpg
SECOND ONE is Angelina Jolie. Strictly from this photo, she's a 9.4 here but I used to think this particular photo looked 9.6 at one point in time.
Maybe my own eyes change over time too... not by much though.
She isn't/wasn't a provider and furthermore she's retired from the porn-biz so I'm not violating the posting rules here, AFAIK.
Solid 9+ even without the photoshop. I mean it's hard to photoshop a video, agree?
Total knockout when she's fully decorated, wearing a nice dress and all, for an evening out with me.
I do miss her sometimes. 
Heck, I'd give McDonald000's left nut and Java6996's right nut for her. 
Solid 9+ even without the photoshop. I mean it's hard to photoshop a video, agree?
Total knockout when she's fully decorated, wearing a nice dress and all, for an evening out with me.
I do miss her sometimes.
Heck, I'd give McDonald000's left nut and Java6996's right nut for her.
Teeth. - 4-ish
-- Modified on 4/12/2012 10:51:39 PM
Just for THIS particular photo, I'd rate her a 6 for face. (Lower for her other photos lol)
Maybe 8.6 for body though. So her score is 5/8.6. Sorry Gaga!
http://whatshaute.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Lady-Gaga.jpg
No clue who she is but supposedly a foreign celeb.
Face: 7.5, not my type but still sufficiently attractive.
Nice bod: 9...
overall appearance qualifies as attractive. I'd bang her.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lCSFOk2WvIE/TbFwedqovlI/AAAAAAAAA6U/3C17ScwZsbE/s1600/carla+abellana+karl+orteza+blog.jpg
she looks cuter after I stared at her photo for a little bit longer. maybe 8 for face (in this particular photo)
This might prove that there must be some time-dependent adjusting factor in beauty too.
Damn hot classy lady of mega proportions. Cover girl for some popular model magazines. Got a bit older now so she doesn't look exactly like this but still hot.
http://newspaper.li/static/b31c74c349e5b2746248d7f7102cf513.jpg
Too bad I'm taken because I can tell she wants a piece of me... at least that what she looks like in this particular photo. 
a whopping humongous 3 or 4 for physical appearance.
Sorry adele.
Please do keep singing and all that, but I don't know if I wanna see you on a cover of sports illustrated swim suit issue.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uHKvU1Ui1T4/TqsQGgsdWTI/AAAAAAAAFEw/-sZNRIRt5Us/s1600/adele.jpg
This particular photo from the old days, she looks smokin'. 9.5 for face... 9.6 for bod.
I'd rate her recent 2012 photos a 7 or at most 8 max though, lmao
Sucks getting old, I don't like it either... but that's life.
http://www.notejode.net/modelos/cindy%20crawford/fotos/Cindy%20Crawford%20(1).jpg.jpg)
the amount of airbrushing that has been done to these two photos has basically created an image of something that does not actually exist.
Why not just ask who is hotter Wilma Flintstone or Betty Rubble...Betty, obviously...but I digress.
Are we supposed to forget that Angelina is a tattooed up bag of bones that used to carry a vile of Billy Bob Thorton's blood around her neck and that she was a major drug addict who used to cut herself and made out with her brother?
And SJP, really? I remember her on Bob Hope specials in the 1970's where she was a young horse-faced, gangly teenager with a huge mole on her chin. Now she is nearly fifty and is an aging horse-faced...well you know where I'm going with this.
At least with Betty and Wilma, the fiction has little baggage, where the reality of both of these ladies is too much for me to find either very palatable, let alone attractive.
-- Modified on 4/11/2012 10:47:57 AM
a good day. Her face ain't doing much for me. And, have you seen her body recently? I'd pass on her. As for Angelina Jolie, I'd give her a 7 too. She ain't doing much for me in terms of the looks department. She looks worn down, as though her career has demised her natural beauty. As for her body, I'd probably give her an 8.
Those girls are average looking to me. I see those girls average looking girls on a regular basis at my J.O.B.
Now, this little fine thing I got depicted here, that right there is worth paying a little more for. I'd give her like a 9 on a bad day. She's got a thin body with big boobs, a pretty little face, and a conservative size ass. I've seen better though. But, you wanna talk about hot, this girl is a true 9 to me. Reason why I give her a 9 is, I've seen her without makeup on. And, she looks like a 9. True beauty does not require makeup IMO. Her name is Kayden Kenzie.
i'm vanishing to mcdonalds because I'm craving a double quarter pounder...
Is she a porn star / provider? i'm guessing she's PS but not sure if she's a provider.
She's about a 8.5 without makeup to me... bod is my type but not sure about her face. still hot tho and better than SJP. lol With makeup, Kayden Kendie does look somewhere around a 9.
Didn't know you like lean girls too.
In that case, how do you like this girl in the photo? Evangeline Lilly... she started out looking about 8.5 to me in that tv series LOST.
Towards the end of that ridiculously frikkin long-ass tv series, she ended up looking about a 9 mostly because the tv show brainwashed me or she grew on me and started finding her and her freckles more attractive. lol
Add some professional photography and she gets closer to 9.3 in this photo. heh
I don't think this one is photoshopped... but either way, I'd give her solid 9.1 for this particular photo.
http://www4.pictures.stylebistro.com/gi/Kim+Kardashian+Makeup+Lipgloss+BKOBvvOi5wjl.jpg
How about before face lift photo?
not sure about her body cuz i can't see it but she seems slim and tone.
this photo i posted here shows she's 9.6 body,
face looks like model-type. judging from YOUR photo alone, i'd say def solid 9.2
photo i linked here makes her face look like 8~8.5 lol
http://www.smsify.com/images/phocagallery/Bollywood-Acctores/Aishwarya%20Rai/thumbs/phoca_thumb_l_aishwarya_rai_5.jpg
The first one: 5
The second one: 6-ish
Good thing they're not escorts....in MY opinion
—-----------
Shhh wait...now that I know how they are:
Sarah Jessica Parker 3-to-5
Jolie: 7-to-9....depending on photo and "look"
-- Modified on 4/12/2012 10:50:18 PM
Favorite actress, but she ranges from 6 to almost 10 yet in the back of my mind I think of her as close to a 9.7 even though I look at her cellulose/fat photo and think "damn she's only a 7 in that photo".
A little chubby for my tastes.
http://spursfansays.com/2012/02/13/scarlett-in-a-bikini/bikini-clad-scarlett-johansson-and-boyfriend-nate-naylor-heat-up-the-beaches-of-hawaii-with-a-bit-of-pda-2/
http://funnyfunda.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Scarlett-Johansson-in-Bikini-1.png
http://fitnessfreaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/scarlett-johansson-sexy-hot-screensaver.jpg
http://spursfansays.com/2012/02/13/scarlett-in-a-bikini/bikini-clad-scarlett-johansson-and-boyfriend-nate-naylor-heat-up-the-beaches-of-hawaii-with-a-bit-of-pda-2/
http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/15400000/SJ-scarlett-johansson-15468419-1280-1024.jpg