Washington DC

maybe, maybe not
Claudius42310 13 Reviews 3160 reads
posted

it is possible that the advertising revenue could corrupt the review approval process which even now is less than perfect. although the incentive of 15 days of membership is tiny some folks are cheap enough to scam VIP this way.

fake reviews slip by. i think that some non fake reviews sometimes get flagged as fraud too.

having provider ads would incentivize having positive reviews for the ladies that chose to advertise. if a review site is going to even have a decent pretense of honesty incentives have to be minimized.

all these were posted at the same time, similar looking model with similar stats and details such as visiting dupont. wonder if they are related? lol

http://www.eros-dc.com/files/132131.htm

http://www.eros-dc.com/files/132129.htm

http://www.eros-dc.com/files/132249.htm

http://www.eros-dc.com/files/132248.htm

same signs of trouble - written by same person

http://www.eros-dc.com/files/134431.htm

http://www.eros-dc.com/files/134433.htm

rollover the tab if you are using Firefox and you will see that they are all the same, starting with DuPont.

And they repeated the same mistake each time - no tour dates.  Rookie scammers, lol

Register Now!