Washington DC

Looks like it might be some clone
j794911 49 Reviews 3857 reads
posted
1 / 15

Just saw one review for them. Anyone else heard of them or can vouch for quality? Are they actually in DC?

Scaramouche 206 Reviews 81 reads
posted
2 / 15

interested as well.
First impression is it seems TGTBT. We'll see.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 80 reads
posted
3 / 15

or copy/rebrand of the MP agency. Might be a new player too. The URL was just registered the end of September.

 
I was not really impresses with how the general section of the review read and don't know if that is the only review by that handle. I was also not very impresses with the "videos" provided. Why shot a video of a bunch of pictures when the pictures could be provided directly? Perhaps some attempt to make people think the video was of the person so more real?  

 
If I had to make a guess I would say probably an actual agency and not some scam site, but not sure I would expect a high quality level of providers from them. Perhaps even below average for what you can get with agencies. We won't know until someone TOFTT but that ain't me these days.

500Roses4u 29 Reviews 71 reads
posted
4 / 15

Saw their site today. Many girls listed but only one reviewed. Many of the reviews are in broken English without punctuation.  Seems to be a pattern to the reviewers history also. Staying away and watching from afar.

spiral12 5 Reviews 87 reads
posted
5 / 15

They’re for real. I TFOTT this week.  Seems like a new group starting up. Standard rates for standard service, BBJ and CFS with CIM.  Going to write a review soon.  Saw Haruna and the pics are really her. They have good lighting and a little filtering, but the pics are real and recent with no photoshop.  

36363jensen 4 Reviews 77 reads
posted
6 / 15

I suspect others will appreciate the assist on getting first hand info.

 
BTW, were they actually in DC -- I think that was also part of the OP's question.

spiral12 5 Reviews 67 reads
posted
7 / 15

Yes. Nice discreet location in DC. I don’t want to be too specific about the location, but its safe, and you can get from your car to the room without being seen.

theTMAN 131 Reviews 64 reads
posted
8 / 15

I have no personal experience but there are 11 reviews, 7 for Lulu and 4 for Haruna.

user2410 8 Reviews 289 reads
posted
9 / 15

They are the real deal and making a sincere effort to give us what we want. The things we complain about most besides performance -- which an agency is not entirely responsible for -- are fake/enhanced pictures, bad punctuality, being asked for tips, hard to get to, no parking, to name a few. And these are the things lovegfs seems to be focused on being better than the rest. And they're doing it! Also, as of now, there are 29 reviews total for four different girls.
 
I have personal experience. It's downtown, which is a problem, but parking is ample and it's convenient to Metro. It's a good part of DC, Union Station, and an upscale apartment in and upscale bldg.  
 
Most notable for me and what clearly distinguishes them from the rest: PHOTOS AND DESCRIPTIONS ARE ACCURATE. I think that alone gets them kudos. There's no smoothing skin, widening eyes, enhancing chests, and lengthening legs. Just raw photos of really cute girls.
 
To cap if off, on my way home I got a text asking me for input on specific aspects of my experience. The types of things a business trying to make a name for itself would ask, not fluff like "was it good?" They are tops among my preferred agencies. Put them on your list without hesitation.

Lingolingosiseler 149 Reviews 78 reads
posted
10 / 15

I posted a few days ago doubting it but ended up going and it’s all good. Had a great time with Kira. Place is  Dangerously close to my commute so will probably take all my money now.

Master D Bater 96 Reviews 71 reads
posted
11 / 15

Either renamed or closed as website is down.

vigerous 20 Reviews 71 reads
posted
12 / 15

Oh god, yes. They've actually been part of MP for months, with the logical consolidation of them, MP, and AP almost complete, it would appear. It turns out that the only complete view of their offerings is found at www.bookersol.com of all things. Weird that AP hasn't got all their girls listed yet. But it has most.

Master D Bater 96 Reviews 63 reads
posted
13 / 15

Hope they get it fixed soon.

vigerous 20 Reviews 74 reads
posted
14 / 15

No question, the AP website is a near disaster. It's always been like this, but now that it's taking prominence, it'd be nice if they got a real designer to revamp it. It wouldn't even require a lot of imagination, they could just copy BookerSol or NYCSmiling or almost any one of the many K-girl sites in NYC. What I also find remarkable is that all of the DC K-girl sites have horrible interfaces. ALL of them, that I know of.
 
Even the LoveGFS site was very bad, awful even. But one thing they had going for them that was mentioned earlier is: "Most notable for me and what clearly distinguishes them from the rest: PHOTOS AND DESCRIPTIONS ARE ACCURATE. I think that alone gets them kudos. There's no smoothing skin, widening eyes, enhancing chests, and lengthening legs. Just raw photos of really cute girls." -- This was true. How is that not recognized as a winning approach? SMH 🫤

itsyaboiskinnipp 68 reads
posted
15 / 15

I think this is there new website ? It has a similar layout to  LoveGFS and girls until the site got shut down

Register Now!