Because we need your help. Some of us here have asked questions or expressed concern about you plagiarizing other escorts' ads and your refusal to remove the pics and info of escorts that no longer work for you from your website. Perhaps now you could address these inquiries? I'm sure there's an explanation. Thanks in advance.
As far as the pics goes, if they paid for the professional pics, they probably have reserved rights to use them as they please. They do post weekly availabilty. Also as far as plagerism is concerned, what escort is going to bring to a court of law considering what we all do is illegal??
Any reputable agency would not have resorted to plagiarism in this blatant manner especislly from one of their own former associates after she has long gone independent.
This practice might be rampant, but it certainly isn't very respectable. It makes desirable look desperate and needy, having to resort to stealing other peoples content.
desirable companions resorted to plagiarism, especially troubling considering they copied off one of their former associate "alexandra min". she has been completely independent since december of last year, yet dc still has not removed her information from their site.
Worse, dc resorts to copying her content and using it as if it is their own.
Alexandra has personally expressed concern over this matter on that pervious thread, yet desirable has the audacity to post yet another advertisement with the plagiarized content.
if u compare, http://www.alexandramin.com to lindsey's ad it is exactly the same
while no one is winning the pulitzer prize, this does not seem like a reputable, respectable practice among the hobby provider community.
It is a community that revolves around mutual trust.
copying others content in this blatant manner is worrisome...
I for one have lost a lot of respect for Desirable companions and wonder if i will utilze their services again.
I don't remember if I used Desirable; if I did it was probably several years ago when they first got started. Recently, I've been thinking about calling them.
Would I boycott Desirable over this incident? Of course not. I am not defending them but it's merely a couple paragraphs of blurb for an illegal business.
By the way, why don't you guys let Alexandra handle this?
They have in the past copied photos and text from others. They are copycats who can't even come up with their own original work. Shows how lax their policies are if they can't even follow simple ethics.
I would not feel comfortable using the services of this agency. Who knows what they'll do with our personal information if they don't respect other people's content? They have clearly lost my trust.
As for Alexandra comments, she DID comment in the previous thread yet Desirable decides to post another ad with the plagiarized content... yet AGAIN. Some of us find it distasteful.
Tell Carlos and his copycat stooges that he just lost a long-time client who's written a number of good reviews for them before.
Who knows WTF Desirable will do with my personal information when shit hits the fan? Desirable doesn't even give one ounce of courtesy to a former lady that briefly used to work for them.
Makes me think: What else are they capable of when the shit hits the fan?
It's quite obvious Desirable is jealous of her huge success if they have to resort to plagiarism and this type of cheap shot juvenile play.
Actually, it's becoming a bit more clear to me you may be affiliated with Desirable. The hostile way that you responded to an absolutely benign question from Socracy is a giveaway. The choice of words you used, also.
So childish.
You guys are making a big deal over "plagiarized" copy?? As if the material is really copyrightable????
Come on guys, take a breath and move on to important shit.
Sure DC has pics of people no longer working. They also maintain a schedule of who is working. The words may be the same as Alexandra Min but no one is confused to think she is still with DC so what is the big deal??? This is a lot of noise about nothing.
Let's talk accurate pics, great service and not getting banned when you tell the truth, now that is important stuff for this forum.
I really don't understand this thread or the previous thread. We know they used the copy. Great. That's really all. There is nothing else to discuss. Wrong, sure, but I have seen worse in the hobby than that.
I am so stunned by how stupid this is........
Now I'm starting to question your affiliation to Desirable. Same guy, same response, claiming that blatantly copying other people's content is an acceptable act that should slide and we all should turn a blind eye to it. Are you for real?
Come on people--plagiarizing is the earmark of a person or persons who has very little to offer in or out of the bedroom. If they are not an original, they are not worth your time or money.
If a business is doing it I would refrain from using them. Simply put, if they lie about this they lie about many many things.
The person who they are copying FROM? Now that's what I would focus on.
food for thought from the stinky cooch police.
If a business is doing it I would refrain from using them. Simply put, if they lie about this they lie about many many things.
The person who they are copying FROM? Now that's what I would focus on.
food for thought from the stinky cooch police.
it's blatant. It's in your face BS. Not all providers and hobbyists LIE and not all lawyers are scum.
Even in politics there are DEGREES. If this agency lies so blatantly be prepared for more of the same. If someone steals photos, words or anything else, I wouldn't be surprised if other things got "lost" in the session as well. Hold onto to your watches.
I don't buy it and this agency is no good if they condone or practice it.
Not all who lie are liars, and not all liars are scums.
Whenever a hobbyist sees a provider and tells his SO otherwise, it is a lie. Whenever an agency tells a client that it is the provider's time of the month when she has a last-minute multi-hour appointment, it is a lie. Whenever a provider tells her client how much she enjoys his company yet talk shit behind his back, it is a lie. The business is about fantasy and deception.
Perhaps -- no, I know -- I am jaded in this hobby, but if you boycott any agency or independent provider who lies, you might as well patronize you left hand (assuming you use your right hand for the mouse).
When I am presented with a provider's ad or web site, I don't read the blurb. It is usually very much forgettable. I go directly to the photo gallery and the donation page; I worry more about fake photos and upsells.
us in this hobby. Yeah we might not believe each provider is a struggling medical student or an ex centerfold but, the truth is a thief is thief.
And frankly, I find it extremely odd how you and the other guy "!!!!" & "youranswer" are the ONLY two making up stupid excuses as to what Desirable has done is OKAY and acceptable. Very suspicious.
Guess what? It is blatant plagiarism no matter what you sugarcoat it to be. Sure, legally there aren't any recourse and it's rampant, but it is what it is. Are you that stupid and unable to recognize it for what it is?
Any idiot knows it's not cool to copy off another. You know it. I know it. Your mother, sister, grandmother, and father knows it.
Just because YOU don't read them does not mean it should suddenly become an accepted practice where you turn a blind eye and say "who cares".
Some of us DO read them because some of us are literate and wish to read them.
Just because YOU don't read them does not mean it should suddenly become an accepted practice where you turn a blind eye and say "who cares".
Fake/old pictures and deceptive descriptions are a FAR bigger problem than this silly nonsense...for one to cross reference phrasing and word choice in defense of a provider to this degree is just weird...
I can see where she would be annoyed...but for the rest of "us"? WGAS
From the standpoint of choosing to patronize an agency or not, the following matters most to ME:
Are the girls hot.
Are the pictures accurate and not overly edited/smoothed/etc?
Are the descriptions accurate?
Are they on time?
Do they get decent hotels?
What is the quality of the experience?
Whether or not they plagiarized the ad copy...is at the bottom of the list...below whether or not I liked the fact that a girl wore pink nail polish instead of rose...
You too are the same guy from last time, under the same alias, stating the same logic. If you think copying content from others is something to turn a blind eye to, hmm... are you affiliated with Desirable?
Might not be a big deal to you, because you're just a John, but to the lady that just got her content stolen it could be a big deal. Ever think of that?
Clearly, some of you are missing the fucking point, entirely. Just because deception MIGHT be the norm TO YOU doesn't mean it should be given a get-out-of jail pass.
Not sure what kind of trashy ladies you've been seeing throughout your hobbying career but the ladies I see don't resort to that type of blatant deception. A little glam-photos here and there MAYBE but not this type of blatant plagiarism of other peoples content. It isn't professional.
Quite low if you ask me.
Alexandra certainly was NOT deceptive of anything. I have never once felt deceived in anyway because she's the real deal.
Heck she does not even advertise here anymore, if you haven't noticed, because she doesn't need to. Neither does she want the extra attention because she's already overwhelmed. People recognize that she's the real deal, and trust me, being deceptive can't win that kind of track record and rating.
Yes, there are providers who don't lie cheat steal from others!
Can you believe it?
And 'Copying a blurb' from others isn't something any of them do, at least not as blatantly as Desirable did!
Apparently, this concept is hard for you to grasp which is why I'm starting to think maybe you're affiliated with Desirable, constantly batting for their dumb plagiarizing unoriginal ass.
First of all, I never said that it was okay for Desirable to copy contents, although it does not deserve two threads started not by the aggrieved.
As for affiliation, I am on their mailing list, but I don't remember having used Desirable's service except perhaps before they changed their name. Believing as I, or *youranswer*, do that copying "intellectual" contents does not deserve so much attention does not make one an affiliate, just as speaking out with an angry emoticon for a provider does not make one a pimp.
Most of all, the reason why I keep posting on this thread is that, from befriending a lot of providers in this hobby, I get to know many of them as capable business persons who can take care of themselves. They don't need doting suitors to do their work for them.
Whether the words are "copyrightable" or not is a non-sequitur. If a provider is working independently, and her pictures are still on the website of an agency she no longer works for, yes, it's a big deal. Its underhanded of the agency to intentionally create that kind of confusion. And when you combine that with the fact that they took the words from her website and used them on their own, it seems vindictive. It looks like they're targeting her, and that's problematic. Where will they stop? How will it affect the clients? The "I've seen worse than that" argument doesn't fly.
And since we're on the subject, why are you so opposed to having these questions raised?
For someone who gives a fuck what you think. I don't. In fact, I don't give a fuck about what DC thinks either. Under your logic, if you suspect that I could be an agent for DC then you could see how you appear to be a candy-assed white knight unable to breathe because you have your head so far up alexanda's fine ass. I don't diasagree that this is plagiarism, I just don't understand why you think the whole fucking world should scream about it when we just want accurate pics. No one thinks Alexandra is working for DC. So WTF.
After all this they just think she is a good writer with a terminally pussy whipped elf in her ass. This is a fucking joke. But I will give you more credit than you give me. If you are going to be the biggest white knight in the fucking world, at least it's for one of the nicest, sexiest ladies around.
I am done with this joke of a thread, and any others that follow this conversation. This is too hilarious to get mad at.
Have a good day dude!
My questioning of what appears to be an agency targeting one of its former employees is quite a different thing than you so ardently defending that wrongdoing. I'm not asking on behalf of Alexandra (never met her in my life), I'm asking as someone that hobbies in DC sometimes and has a problem with being misled. I'm asking as someone that has a problem with agencies acting in what appears to be a vindictive manner. I'm asking as someone wondering whether or not I should be avoiding one of city's largest agencies and people connected to it. That's MY justification for asking the question. What's your justification for taking such offense to it? Either you lack the cognitive ability to see how this could affect all the hobbyists here, or you're somehow involved with DC and you're defending what appears to be shady behavior. And it's pretty transparent.
First fallacy of good argument....resort to name calling. Oh well, it works well for politicians. I'd prefer not to see it in clean biz....such as this. 
Plagiarism is plagiarism. It shows business practices. So does requiring the kinds of info you ask for as a requirement. While I would love to see some of your ladies, unless you are willing to share your ss # and other info, I won't be a customer. Just my 2 cents...or 350 dollars.
Exactly. I'm no longer their customer either.
Hope Desirable realize that they just lost a few clients by engaging in shady business practices.