If you were a provider with a dibilitating illness (like congestive heart failure and pneumonia), would you continue to work?  Likewise, if you were a client and you knew a provider had this, would you want to continue seeing her?

pneumonia is freaking curable, even if it was something serious do to an acute Staph Aureus infection. If she has an active infection she better get treated or else she will spread the disease. However, TB or lung cancer is more serious, and no, I would not see anyone that has/had either.

CHF  is not transmittable, but it usually happens to old people. If she claims she is in her 30's and have this condition, she was probably lying. She was more like 50, lol

The reason why I mentioned that is because you misspelled debilitating twice, and I just wanted to bring that to your attention. Debilitating means a condition that is irreversible and will make the person weaker. As for illness, its a disease such as AIDS, and STD, Alzheimer, blindness (yes, there are different degrees of blindness, you can be blind, but not legally blind), or another disease.

The physical demands of being a provider does take a toll on a person. There is also the emotional and cognitive aspects as it relates to providing. I'm not speaking for the providers, and this is only my opinion. If a provider does not have the adequate energy, enthusiasm, and mindset associate to providing, then it would be difficult for her to provide, or at least do it in a way that will satisfy a client totally.

As for me a hobbyist, her behavior will reflect her debilitating disease, and so the lack luster service will be the result. Unless she is good at covering it up. You asked, if I knew a provider with a debilitating disease, would I see her? The answer is no. Why would I want to see someone that is not at their best.

Besides the escort scene, any person with a debilitating disease should not be working, or working to the standards of what one would consider normal. There were some people at my work place that had other debilitating diseases and quit work for them to recover. Having different occupations doesn't make the person immune once they have a debilitating disease.

You are correct, I misspelled debilitating!

In this case, the provider was first treated for pneumonia. I can understand that being in close contact with many clients over time might cause the occasional cold and left untreated, turned into pneumonia. During the diagnosis and treatment for pneumonia, it was discovered that she had congestive heart failure. What I don't understand is that while the pneumonia has not completely gone away and she still has limited pulmonary capacity due to that and the chf, why in the hell would she continue to provide.