This is something that's been bothering me for a while, but I waited as I did not want to create trouble for the lady. Now that she's gone, I feel it's something I can speak on.
A couple of months ago there was an inquiry about Hae Soo and there was suspicion that she might be the same person as True Nicole. One poster claimed to have seen both of them and that they are both different ladies... He also said he has seen several girls at the agency and that it was tops (despite the fact that the agency had just opened up).
Well, stupid me, I believed him and 'lo and behold.... Hae Soo = Nicole. I had already seen her before but I did not want to create trouble so I just paid and stayed for the second time.
I guess I'm just venting, but also looking for suggestions on how not to fall for this kind of stupid stuff again?
Stick to what you KNOW. Everything posted here is not always 100% true. Remember that.
Happy Hobbying!
First off i have seen her both as Nicole and Hae-soo. And I would see her under
any name she wants to call herself. She is one great provider and one of
the few I would see over and over again.
She had asked me to not mention that she was previously Nicole due
to some trouble she was having with her previous agency??. So I honored her
request.
I suppose you feel deceived by this and understandably so. Just let it go and
move on as Im sure it will probable happen to you again somewhere in the future. Its
not the first time it happened to me and both times it turned out very well. Life
and hobbing is an adventure and you never know whats going to be behind the door.
Hope what you're referring to is not mine, since mine has been moderated. My original was H=N
Anyway, I did enjoy both times with them or just her, I will still repeat no matter under what names.
You could have just asked the agency and they probably would have told you so. They don't want dissatisfied customers and those who liked True Nicole would love to know that she is now at this agency.
You can write a new review and get 2 weeks free VIP...
If a lady has two profiles on here under two different names, of course we can write a second review for her second name that does not mention that we've already known her under her previous name.
It's dishonest, but I know for a fact that it has happened.
"If a lady has two profiles on here under two different names, of course we can write a second review for her second name that does not mention that we've already known her under her previous name.
It's dishonest, but I know for a fact that it has happened. "
Thanks for the info..I never saw Nicole . I didn't know they were the same.
Once I spend 30 seconds with my problem report, its too late to review the one provider in question as two.
Problem reports correct dishonesty, whether intentional or not,and two days VIP credit.
I thought she might have simply left the area, good to know I didn't miss her for good.
Golf,
As the Godfather once said - 'Never take sides against the family'. Providing intel to fellow mongers should be the priority here. Girls have their pimps/agencies that do their marketing/work for them. Remeber, in the end, they don't give a fuck about you. You=ATM.
+1 (to the sentiment if not the exact wording)
Not divulging the fact that two girls are the same person at the request of the provider (or any other reason for that matter) is absolutely fine and proper conduct. I guess that comes with the caveat of them not being B&S or some other strongly negative encounter. However, actively stating "I saw both and they aren't the same" when you know it's not true is way beyond dishonest. It is really no different than saying the photos are accurate when a 4 shows up for a 9's pictures....
The fact that it is a positive encounter for the shill is meaningless. One person's 8 is another person's 6, and there could be many reasons a hobbyist doesn't want to see a particular provider again. Outright lies about who someone is are as damaging as false reviews.
If you don't want to reveal the "true" identity of a provider just don't comment. You'll have honored the providers wishes by not revealing the link without lying about the identity. I have to think that lying on the board at the request of a provider is a serious breach of rules correct? At a minimum it makes me discount the reviewer.
if the reason for her name change and different profile was to avoid the previous agency... her cover is blown.
given that there are different reasons for changing names and profiles, it is hard to avoid this sort of mix up. one tedious method of tracing an identity through troubles with SMCDOAC (the society for mass consumption of doughnuts and over acidic coffee) is to search the DC board for retirements and reappearances. i avoided some providers with a habit of flipping their clients that way.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
